Forum Topics

Taking a bus in London? It might be quicker to walk

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/taking-a-bus-in-london-it-might-be-quicker-to-walk-fjs2sc2txThe mayor has been urged to review cycle lane and low-traffic policies after a watchdog revealed that average bus speeds had fallen as low as 6.6mphBus speeds were as low as an average of 6.6mph in central London. A typical jogging speed is about 6 mphTaking the bus from Abbey Road Studios to Tate Britain, for example, a distance of only four miles, was scheduled to take up to one hour and 15 minutes. In the City of London, the financial capital of Britain, average speeds were even slower at just 6.6 mph.The average person walks at about 3mph and jogs at about 6mph, meaning it would be quicker to walk or run than take the bus for many journeys in London, particularly during the busiest periods.A London bus driver, who wished to remain anonymous, said that the replacement of bus lanes with cycle lanes, the introduction of low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), floating bus stops where cycle lanes pass on the inside, 20mph speed limits and pavement widening had combined to increase congestion and slow journeys to a crawl.“Drivers have had enough,” he said. “Today I was meant to have a one-hour lunch but because of congestion it got taken down to 40 minutes, and it was the same yesterday and the day before. Our breaks are also getting shorter thanks to delays. Yet there are fewer cars on the roads. It’s madness. No wonder we’re seeing more bus collisions. Drivers are crashing due to fatigue. The problem is if you speak out you get sacked. It’s depressing.”Analysis of the watchdog’s data by The Times found that nine of the ten London boroughs with the biggest falls in bus speeds had introduced LTNs since 2020 while only three of the ten with the smallest reductions had done so.Critics have said that LTNs in residential areas simply relocate traffic to main roads, adding to congestion and delaying buses.One of the biggest drops in bus speeds was in Hackney, which now has 70 per cent of its roads covered by LTNs.The bus driver said: “The real problem with LTNs is when there are road works or an accident. Then they can have a massive effect on an area because there is no other way out. If other roads were open then cars could get out and that could help buses move a bit more freely but it doesn’t happen.”London TravelWatch said the replacement of bus lanes with cycling lanes and poorly planned roadworks were also delaying journeys.Sonya Dallat, of the watchdog, said: “While we support measures to encourage active travel in London and help reduce air pollution and car use, we want all transport users to be considered. As buses are the only fully accessible mode of public transport, we are urging Transport for London to maintain and not remove bus lanes when implementing new road schemes, as well as to better enforce existing bus lane restrictions, and increase bus lane operating hours.”About five million bus journeys were taken in Greater London each day in the year 2022-23The Times conducted a four-month battle with Transport for London (TfL) to get it to reveal how many bus lanes it had replaced with cycle lanes but it declined to answer, at first arguing the information would be too expensive to obtain and then changing its position to say it did not hold the data.The bus driver said that replacing bus lanes with cycle lanes was a big issue, especially at certain pinch points. “Outside St Paul’s, for example, you used to get to [the road] New Change quite easily and quickly using the bus lane but now you can lose up to 30 minutes trying to turn left towards the Strand — all because the bus lane has gone. It was not even a long bus lane but it was enough to help us.“Since then we’ve also had all these floating bus stops and they can also delay us because if there’s more than one bus coming in, you have to wait while the other unloads whereas before you could all pull in and serve people at the same time.”Cycling campaigners have said investment in cycle infrastructure works because it encourages more people to get on bikes, which is good for their health and reduces pollution. Data from TfL shows that cycling journeys have increased by 20 per cent since 2019.However, critics have argued that the hundreds of millions of pounds spent encouraging cycling has disproportionately benefited those who are already better off.The data from TfL showed that the majority of cyclists were higher-earning, middle-aged men while bus users tended to have lower incomes and higher proportions of women and ethnic minorities. Buses were also the most popular form of public transport in London in the financial year to 2023 with about five million journeys every day. Cycling accounted for only 4.5 per cent of journeys.Vincent Stops, who worked as a policy officer at London TravelWatch for 20 years and as a councillor in Hackney for 16 years, believed that TfL and councils were putting cyclists ahead of bus users. “It’s quite bizarre,” he said. “TfL has a programme of installing bus priority on the one hand, but at the same time taking out key stretches of bus lane for cycle lanes.”The campaign group Social and Environmental Justice called on Khan, the mayor of London, to take action on the decline in the speed of bus journeys.“Buses are the capital’s most widespread and affordable form of public transport,” the group said in a statement. “We call on Sadiq Khan to investigate urgently why bus speeds have slowed at a time when traffic across most of London is still lower than in 2019. Where traffic management schemes such as LTNs are found to be impeding bus journeys, they should be removed as soon as possible. London and Londoners must keep moving.”The bus driver believed that 20mph speed limits and pavement widening were also causing delays. “The narrowing of roads such as Oxford Street is a nightmare because as soon as there is any accident or collision everything comes to a standstill,” he said. “There is no space to keep the road moving. It’s amateurish.“Twenty mile per hour limits are another problem. In the mornings if I start at 4am, the roads are dead but my bus has a system fitted which means I cannot exceed the limit. I get overtaken by cyclists.”Lorna Murphy, the TfL director of buses, said that LTNs allowed more people to walk and cycle. “London’s bus network plays a vital role in enabling people to travel sustainably and affordably and we’re working hard to make it even better,” she said. “This includes investment in new bus lanes and other measures to give buses priority on the roads.“We are also developing more zero-emission buses with innovative features to improve customer experience. We welcome this report from London TravelWatch and are carefully examining its findings.”

Michael Good ● 276d176 Comments ● 208d

2025 Doom and Gloom ?

Ha, not politics I'm afraid but is on many people's minds So what can survive locally in 2025 I have an idea that a very long establishment may not survive. I won't mention the name but my experience yesterday points to it maybe not surviving. I base this on the grounds of the proprietor's language and arguments for and against against me. Why was my shopping experience a heated one? Well, that was based on him pretty much insisting on cash and then telling me it is costing him £1.20 for the card transaction. He then went on to say he was losing customers hand over fist and continued to argue with me. I gave him some advice and that wound him up even more. For starters, if I can pay by card for a £2 pint of milk in a local non-chain newspaper-type convenience store, that points to him maybe not in my view telling the truth or he needs to shop around which was my advice for another card payment Co. Secondly, I said you need to sit down and work out your budget and what you are paying for goods and possibly shop elsewhere and if in places raise your prices. Anyway, it was a little heated but I only went in to purchase something and he insisted on cash. I said I don't carry cash anymore like many people and so he began. As to me not paying with cash, I'm no longer wanted as a customer. And with that and all that was said, I think it's struggling and only time will tell. Maybe others may have had the same reception and know the establishment. I can't be the only one based on what I walked into What annoyed me was it was all my fault for pulling out my card which I have to say have done so over the years in this shop. It's an issue for him and a reason. Thank god my shopping experience over 30 years in Chiswick has only just recently taken a turn. That could be a sign of things to come

Julian Pavey ● 232d23 Comments ● 223d

Health in Cities

The Chief Medical Officer, Professor Whitty, published the annual report on health in cities yesterday. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6756e67b43b2de5fee8dae87/cmo-annual-report-2024-health-in-cities.pdfThere is, of course, a section dedicated to Active Travel starting on page 333. It's really very good and many of the points will be familiar to my personal fan club on this forum. It sets out the case for Active Travel's role in creating healthier urban populations - integrating exercise into our daily movements has numerous health benefits. Then it outlines the barriers and how they need to be overcome. It is a short section and I encourage you all to read it. Here are a few excerpts:On car reduction:  "Reducing private vehicle journeys and car dependency†45 by increasing active travel reduces air and noise pollution and levels of carbon emissions in cities. It also reduces traffic congestion, thereby increasing mobility, accessibility and speed of journeys, increasing productivity and economic benefits, and health equity for households without access to a vehicle.""Over-reliance of private cars is an inefficient use of city space. Supporting people to use active or sustainable travel frees up space for more health and wealth generating activities, e.g. space for play, community amenities, socialising and green spaces, all of which improve the quality of life in our cities."On deterrents to active travel:"Fear of cars and poor driving practices such as speeding are a major deterrent to active travel. Whilst the hierarchy of road users in the Highway Code (Figure 4.61) seeks to protect pedestrian and cyclists as the more vulnerable road users, this is not consistently applied in the design of infrastructure, or enforced. Some examples are when cars park in cycle lanes or when motorists assume they have right of way"

Paul Campbell ● 250d27 Comments ● 241d

Am I going mad or are zebra crossings getting more dangerous?

I’m really noticing more close shaves at zebra crossings in the last year or so. I have no data to back this up, except my own anecdotal evidence. Anyone else notice a trend?It’s not just those on the High Road, but these ones feature heavily. I’ll say at the outset that I’m a cyclist, not a driver, or rather, I ride a bike, don’t drive a car. Taking the bike lane first, bikes haven’t stopped for me, more times than is excusable to be honest. I’m not totally innocent on this front - there has been the very odd occasion when I’ve kept going through a zebra crossing, though this is rare. I now really check both sides of the road for pedestrians about to cross. I think you can also tell as well, when someone has a momentary lapse in awareness, versus people who never intended to stop (rarer) or are cycling at a much lower level of awareness in general (more common). There’s just too many occasions of bikes not stopping, in my view, for these to be explained by momentary lapses. I think it’s rather the case that there are more unaware people on bikes, which I’d put down to the increase in bike sharing programmes, in particular e-bikes like Lime. I’d love for ever increasing numbers of bikes, but I really think people need to have their own bikes, which are suited to their height and weight etc. Most people cannot control Lime bikes sufficiently. Bikes aren’t even the most worrying flouters of the rules at zebra crossings, that’s cars (and motorbikes). Obviously this is much more dangerous and also much more inexcusable. If bikes aren’t stopping at crossings as much as they used to because of more unfamiliar cyclists on the road, there’s no excuse for cars not stopping. It’s hardly the case that there are more inexperienced drivers on the road. I simply think it’s that people don’t care anymore in cars. They just cruise on through crossings. Just now I was a quarter of the way across CHR and one car just cruises through - something that no longer surprises me. Then, however as I got to half way across, straddling both lanes the car behind it also fails to stop. Again, these are anecdotes, with no basis in data, but I’d wager heavily that I’m not the only one seeing things getting worse. Also I make it very clear I’m about to cross the road. I never dart out at an angle or approach the road looking down at my phone. I turn 90 degrees to the crossing and look right, left and right again. Pedestrians are king. Then bikes. Then cars. Rant over. Just getting really tired of this.

Edward Kent ● 269d106 Comments ● 243d

Increased Thames seal sightings could be 'new normal' says expert, as warning issued to Londoners

Dog owners have been asked to keep their pets on leashes...A wildlife expert has issued an appeal to Londoners amid a “sharp increase” in seal sightings in the Thames - which she says is likely to become a “new normal” in the capital.Mary Tester, founding director of Thames Seal Watch, said there has been a sudden surge in seal sightings in the capital as more of the mammals appear to be making their way up the river and “exploring areas of London”.She said she is anxious to avoid a repeat of the 2021 incident in which a beloved seal pup that had been named Freddie by locals had to be put down after being mauled by a dog on the shore near Hammersmith Bridge.She has urged Londoners to keep their distance from seals if they them on shore, and to keep their dogs on leads.“We’re currently seeing a sharp increase in seal sightings in London,” Ms Tester, who is also Thames area coordinator for the British Divers Marine Life Rescue (BDMLR), told The Standard.“Seals have long lived in the river with the latest estuary populations from ZSL counting nearly 600 harbour seals and 3,000 greys.“The newer trend is that they seem to be more regularly exploring areas of London.”There have also been several sightings of dolphins in the Thames in recent months, as far west as Hammersmith.“While there is still no proven reason as to why, it may be a testament to the diverse food sources available to them, with little competition,” said Ms Tester.Stretches of the Thames were declared “biologically dead” by the Natural History Museum in the 1950s but the ZSL says it is now home to 125 species of fish.https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/seals-sightings-thames-river-animals-dogs-warning-london-b1195142.html

Les Wilson ● 273d4 Comments ● 271d

How rogue cyclists have made London’s parks unsafe for children and the elderly

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/16/speeding-cyclists-royal-parks-london-injured/​​Dossier reveals hit-and-runs, riders travelling on illegal bikes and pedestrians being struck so hard they are ‘catapulted’ into the airRichmond Park, which cycling clubs use to record lap speeds, was reported as having the highest number of incidents, along with Regent’s Park Credit: PA/AlamyThe full threat posed to pedestrians by dangerous and illegal cycling in the country’s best-known parks can be revealed by The Telegraph for the first time.The Royal Parks, which runs eight London parklands, has released a dossier of collision data showing how the elderly, the partially sighted and children have been knocked down and injured by cyclists.The file, released under freedom of information laws, logs “speeding” and “aggressive” cyclists being involved in hit-and-runs, ignoring zebra crossings, travelling on illegal bikes and hitting pedestrians so hard they are “catapulted” into the air.Richmond Park and Regent’s Park, which cycling clubs use to record lap speeds, were reported as having the highest number of incidents.The document includes how Brian Fitzgerald, a Credit Suisse director, collided with Hilda Griffiths, 81, as she walked her dog in Regent’s Park in 2022, causing “life-changing injuries”.The Muswell Hill Peloton cyclist, riding at 29mph in a 20mph zone, could not be prosecuted because speed limits do not apply to bikes. Mrs Griffiths died two months later from her injuries.The dossier shows another pedestrian suffered two broken ribs after being hit by a cyclist “doing laps” after he failed to “look properly” when crossing a nearby road a few months earlier.Last year, a cyclist reported feeling “unsafe” because peloton cyclists were “riding on his wheel”.However, the file is not exhaustive and does not include Paola Dos Santos, 52, who suffered severe facial injuries when hit by a cyclist on the wrong side of the road.In Richmond Park in February, a cyclist on a fixed-wheel bike struck a pedestrian “at speed” on a “busy” path with a 10mph speed limit. The bike, which had no front brake, is banned in the parks and “not road legal”, the file says.In August, a pedestrian was taken to hospital with “multiple serious injuries to arm, head and hip” by a “speeding cyclist” who then “fled the scene”.The file includes a letter from a runner who said he would no longer visit the park because “it is becoming so dangerous”.He added: “I’ve on four occasions nearly been hit by a speeding bike. It’s all well and good saying pedestrians have priority but it’s clear that many cyclists (not all of course) are not adhering to this rule.”In January, a cyclist was attacked by another cyclist who was “throwing punches and kicking them on the ground”.In the past four years, Richmond Park had numerous reports of cyclists going “at least 30mph”, “full pelt” or “out of control”.In 2020, a partially sighted pedestrian was “knocked to the ground” by a cyclist who had his “head down because of the wind”. A “very fast” cyclist “on the wrong side of the road crashed head-on into another cyclist”.In Hyde Park in September, a pedestrian was “thrown to the ground” suffering face, wrist and knee injuries after being “struck” by a cyclist near the Serpentine. A year earlier, a pedestrian was taken to hospital suffering dizziness after being “hit” by a Lime bike near Speakers’ Corner.In Kensington Gardens this July, a child was found “bleeding a lot” after being “badly hit by a teenager riding an electric Lime bike” near the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Playground Since the summer of 2020, there have been reports of “near misses” near Kensington Palace, where bikes are banned.A Royal Parks volunteer was “knocked down” and left “shaken” because the cyclist “was shouting and being generally aggressive”.In St James’s Park a pedestrian was hit by a cyclist who “failed to stop at a red signal” – police were called. Then, close to the Mall, a cyclist among a group of 30 “collided with a pedestrian” who “sustained a head injury”.In Bushy Park, a cyclist repeatedly rode their bike into a herd of deer, “causing them to stampede” and scaring other visitors.Gerard Griffiths, the son of Hilda Griffiths, said the dossier illustrated the “alarming attitude of some cyclists”, adding how he fears many more incidents go unreported.He welcomed the Royal Parks’ request to ministers to try to find a legal route to make the parks’ 20mph speed limits apply to cyclists.A source at the Department for Culture Media and Sport, which has Government responsibility for the parks, said: “We have received a proposal to improve safety for park users from the Royal Parks and are considering it.”A Royal Parks spokesman said although cycling has a “deep-rooted history” in the city’s parklands, “the speeds that can now be achieved when cycling in such populated spaces bring new challenges that we are committed to addressing”.She added that the charity had reviewed its policies following “several cycling-related incidents linked to a minority of people cycling at excessive speeds” and had “implemented physical changes in the parks, including larger or wider pedestrian paths, additional crossing points to improve pedestrian safety and additional signage”.She continued: “The parks are shared spaces where pedestrians, cyclists and wildlife coexist, and we have a responsibility to all park users to ensure we are acting in a way that protects and promotes their safety. We continue to work closely with cycling groups, community groups and the Met Police to do all we can to ensure the parks can be enjoyed safely by everyone, now and in the future.”

Michael Good ● 277d6 Comments ● 276d

London’s Royal Parks demand 20mph limit for cyclists after spate of crashes

London’s Royal Parks demand 20mph limit for cyclists after spate of crashesNew legislation would make it possible to prosecute cyclists just like motorists for speeding on park roads shared by allThe charity responsible for London’s Royal Parks has written to ministers demanding they create new laws to make cyclists obey 20mph speed limits.In a move that threatens the way some cyclists use the capital’s outdoor spaces as velodromes, The Royal Parks is seeking new legislation so cyclists can be prosecuted for speeding just like motorists in their parks.It follows a spate of serious injuries connected to cycling, including the death of Hilda Griffiths, 81, who died after being hit by a speeding cyclist in Regent’s Park in June 2022.Her inquest was told that police did not prosecute the cyclist, riding at 29mph in a 20mph zone, because speed limits do not apply to bikes.Lloyd Grossman, the chairman of The Royal Parks, has now written to Sir Chris Bryant, the Minister for Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism who has Government responsibility for the parks, requesting that laws are updated.The letter says the charity’s board wants an amendment to The Royal Parks and Other Open Spaces Regulations 1997 “with a view to setting speed limits for cyclists”.He adds: “This will match what is already in place for motor vehicles on our park roads, namely a maximum speed limit of 20mph.“Whilst we recognise there are challenges associated with this request, most notably on enforcement, we believe it is a change that would improve safety within the parks for both cyclists and other park users.”Any new legislation would affect parks, including Regent’s Park and Richmond Park, where roads have popular cycling routes shared with vehicles and pedestrians.Mrs Griffiths’ son, Gerard, 51, who has campaigned for an update in cycling laws, said: “This is something that should be in place not just for parks but all roads and I would encourage the Government to put speed limits into place for cycling with legislation that gives parity to all road users.”Sean Epstein, the chairman of Regent’s Park Cyclists which represents about 35 cycling clubs and shares safe riding advice with them, said they were working with The Royal Parks on several schemes to promote safe cycling.“In a 2021 FOI request, The Royal Parks confirmed that the motor vehicle speed limit does not apply to cyclists within their parks. We welcome further clarification on this point from the Government,” he said.A Royal Parks spokesman confirmed the letter had been sent, adding: “We have a responsibility to everyone who uses the parks to ensure we are acting in a way that protects and promotes their safety.”A DCMS source said it was right that The Royal Parks “continue to examine ways to improve safety”.She added: “We are aware of a Royal Parks proposal to improve safety for park users and will consider it carefully.”The letter comes after The Royal Parks cancelled a well-organised bike race in Richmond Park amid fears cyclists would exceed the 20mph limit and pose a threat to pedestrians.The charity imposed a 20mph speed limit across all its parks in September 2020.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/19/london-royal-parks-20mph-limit-cyclists-spate-crashes/

Michael Good ● 305d83 Comments ● 301d

Devonshire Road Oyster Whistles in Tune

This Whistling Oyster has barely been cracked open but me and my neighbouring fishy friends just can't stay away. This brilliantly imaginative new harbour for Chiswick's abundant shoal of shellfish and wine lovers is sure to become the new pearl of Devonshire Road. Fishmonger by day and seafood and wine bar by night, it's the brainchild of partners Sasha Mantel and Rob Gillon – in cahoots with well-known local fishmonger John Robinson and his partner Bonnie; the latter duo remembered by hundreds of grateful customers from the days of covid lockdown when they so brilliantly fronted the fish shop in the Turnham Green Terrace. Remember that queue? An Oyster that also whistles is the dream of a new fish and wine emporium - right up there with the best and most important shops in fashionable Devonshire Road. It doesn't just sell fabulous fish, it doubles-up as a licensed seafood bar with seating indoors and out, selling a range of tasty treats alongside an amazing range of British wines.Unlike most fishmongers, the Whistling Oyster doesn't display its fresh fish in the window (that's a prime spot reserved for indoor eating). Cleverly they’ve placed their impressive fish counter towards the back of the shop. Styled and selected by John, it's expertly packed tight with a full range of British (mainly Cornish) fish and shellfish. Strategically placed elsewhere, I could see all the finest accoutrements to fish eating anyone could possibly want - plus carefully selected smoked fish and a small freezer. There's even a state-of-the-art whole salmon dryer (same technique as Macken's use to store their finest ribs of beef). But even if you're not a fan of fish, it's almost worth popping in for the bread alone, sourced from an independent bakery in Fulham. And they also deliver – free locally I believe.Then there's the seafood bar menu, backed up, or rather washed down, by a huge selection of British wines (inc bubbles) or English cider and beer and lager – just about whatever floats your boat. Of course some of it is pricey. But a glass of Winchcombe Downs 2019 Gloucester white is a snip at £6 a glass and there's many other similar choices with full bottles in the £25-£35 range. So, on our several visits so far I've had (not all at the same time) a dozen Jersey oysters which were simply amazing. But don't just take my word for it. Fellow diners and retired W4 food royalty John and Sally Southey, of Chiswick's Southey's Restaurant fame, were also “there for the Jersey's” - and John assured me that, in his view, these really are one of the finest. I also had some wonderful crab, a few langoustine, watched others enjoying a great plate of sardines on toast and tried out (swapped) a few other great oysters from different parts of the country including Cornwall. There's seats for 11 indoors and sixteen outdoors – Thursday to Sunday from 4.00pm to 10.00pm.Sorry to carp on, but this is surely the plaice to be. I'm hooked.

Sean Barton ● 1038d35 Comments ● 305d

Volunteers needed

Hi there,I am volunteering with You Me Bum Bum Train (YMBBT).https://www.bumbumtrain.com/I am posting this as we are looking for more volunteers.You Me Bum Bum Train is a world-famous immersive theatre experience that’s loved by so many. We’re gearing up for our next big show in Covent Garden this November, and I’m reaching out because we’d love for you to be part of the fun!We’re offering unpaid volunteer roles that give everyone a chance to dive into every aspect of immersive theatre – from prop-making and set building to performing, stage management, production, admin, lighting and sound. There’s also free training and certification from industry pros, so it’s a fantastic way to gain real-world experience and skills that could lead to jobs in the theatre/creative industry. Many of our past volunteers have landed roles based on what they’ve learned with us.YMBBT is a non-profit, volunteer-led project – it’s all about community and creativity. We work with volunteers  from all walks of life (ages 8 to 80!), and we’d love for you to get involved. People say it’s an “exhilarating, life-changing experience” for everyone who takes part – whether they’re on stage or behind the scenes.Our last show in 2015 was a massive hit – tickets were in higher demand than Glastonbury, with over 120,000 people applying in the first minute! If this sounds like something you would enjoy you can sign up here:https://ymbbt2.knack.com/bumbumworldI can also send you a pdf one pager and The Times review from last time.Or please email me for further informationaliegriffiths@yahoo.co.ukMany thanks, Alie

Alie Griffiths ● 339d0 Comments ● 339d

Hogarth Roundabout - more congestion in Chiswick - please email opposition to TfL's proposals

Hello everyone. This is my first post on here, as it's not my kind of thing usually, but I am astonished at TfL's proposals for Hogarth Roundabout. Sorry if I’m a little late to the party, but my bone of contention is not Church Road (I'll mention it briefly below), but the "Advance Stop Lines" that TfL is proposing on all entrances to the roundabout - these will slow the flow of traffic through the roundabout and cause more congestion on Chiswick Lane (when you try to leave Chiswick) and on the A316 (when you are trying to get home).What is an "Advance Stop Line"?   It's the white box at the front of the traffic lights with a bicycle painted in it that allows cyclists to pull away ahead of cars. I quite like them when I am cycling - in some places they really do improve safety. But they won't on Hogarth Roundabout!Why? Because no cyclists will use them! I cycle this area frequently and every cyclist I have ever seen leaves Chiswick Lane, or the A316, and passes under the roundabout through the underpass (or they use one of the several other underpasses both east and west of the roundabout. So why has TfL put them in its design?  For goodness sake, they have even put Advance Stop Lines in their design across 3 and 4 lanes of the A4! The A4 has a combined cyclepath/pavement along each side of it, which I use regularly - I have never - in decades - seen a cyclist on the main carriageway. What on earth are TfL thinking - it's ideology gone mad!Instead, what these Advance Stop Lines will do is reduce the flow of traffic through the roundabout in each light phase as cars, vans, motorbikes will have further to travel before they reach the roundabout. This will cause more congestion on Chiswick Lane and the A316 in particular.  Chiswick Lane is already frequently backed up to the High Road; the A316 backs up past Cavendish and Chiswick schools frequently. What TfL proposes will only make getting out of Chiswick even worse, and pour even more pollutants into these school sites.  Frankly, I think it's one of the most stupid things I have ever seen a government propose (and after the last lot that takes something!).  TfL is actually going to spend money on something that will never be used and overall make things worse!So, please send a short email to TfL (haveyoursay@tfl.gov.uk) opposing their plans to put "Advance Stop Lines" on Hogarth Roundabout.Thank you. I hope I don't attract the opprobrium of the cycling lobby who seem to lurk on these pages, but surely even they use the underpass too?!As for Church Street, I can't see why they can't add a fourth lane to the A4 turning left into the A316 and still have a direct access and exit from Church Street.  TfL's proposal seems dangerous to me - anyone turning into the new Church Road entrance will stop or slow all traffic on the A316 (which it doesn't presently), which will then back up onto the roundabout - the most dangerous part of Hogarth Roundabout in my view is when traffic queueing to reach the A316 forces eastbound A4 traffic down to 2 lanes on the roundabout - that's quite scary and will potentially be worse with the TfL proposal.And for what it's worth - why are they adding more cycle parking and benches? Are they expecting the roundabout to become a destination?! Put the benches in and the cycle parking near Chiswick House please and stop wasting money!Honestly, I don't know what's going on at TfL - maybe they gave this one to the summer intern to do!

Nigel Williams ● 352d32 Comments ● 340d

Children in ULEZ more likely to walk or cycle

A new study has been published which finds that children living in ULEZ are twice as likely to switch to walking and cycling to school and being advantaged by the resulting health benefits.  A few excerpts from the summary: "Among children who took inactive modes at baseline, 42% of children in London and 20% of children in Luton switched to active modes."
"Implementation of clean air zones can increase uptake of active travel to school and was particularly associated with more sustainable and active travel in children living further from school."
"Motorised vehicle use negatively impacts health throughout life, influencing children's physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and contributing to diseases like childhood asthma linked to air pollution. Regular physical activity, crucial for children's healthy growth and mental well-being [1, 2], also plays a vital role in preventing the development of obesity [3], prevalent in 23% of children aged 10–11 in 2022 [4]."
https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7 As motorised vehicle use negatively impact health throughout life it is never too late for anybody to switch to more active modes and get healthier so think about that next time you jump in the car and drive less than two miles to the shops or to drop your kids at school. And definitely think about the negative impact on your kids of driving them around Chiswick.  For some strange reason this study is driving right wing commentators and their dimwitted followers a bit loopy on the internet but I am sure the people of Chiswick are not so fragile ...

Paul Campbell ● 348d45 Comments ● 343d

Richmond Park London Duathlon cancelled amid safety fears over speeding cyclists

The Royal Parks charity has grown increasingly concerned about cyclists’ behaviour after an inquest in May into the death of Hilda Griffiths, 81, a retired teacher who was killed in Regent’s Park, north London, after being struck by a cyclist doing timed laps of the park in 2022.The “full duathlon” course consisted of a 20km run, 77km bike ride then another 10km run. But organisers have been told by park officials that the event cannot go ahead as planned on September 8.Announcing the cancellation, the organisers said: “There have been a number of unforeseen factors this year that have led to this difficult decision, particularly in relation to the operational complexity of producing a multi-sport event.“This includes an increased focus on the security and logistics of cycling events in public spaces which creates significant operational challenges. Our team has been working hard to explore all available options in recent weeks, but we have concluded that we can’t make the event work this year.”In a statement concerning the duathlon, the charity said: “A range of factors, including significant operational challenges, have meant that the London Duathlon will not be going ahead in Richmond Park this year. We will work closely with potential event organisers to determine the future of the event.”In June, two smaller club-organised time-trial events were cancelled over fears riders would break the park’s 20mph speed limit. At the time, the charity said it was “pausing” such events while it reviewed its position on such events.The Richmond Park Time Trials, organised by the London Dynamo cycling club and first held in 2009, provided the only opportunity for cyclists to race against the clock in one of the capital’s royal parks, according to road.cc, a bike news website.The organisers argued that the time trials “pose no harm to anyone” given their 6am start time, when there are few pedestrians and the park is closed to motor vehicles. They added that any alternative routes comprise “mostly busy roads and fast-moving cars”.Organisers of the duathlon said they do not know if the event will be able to go ahead next year.The inquest into Griffiths’s death heard that vehicular speed limits did not apply to bicycles and a police review found that “there were no criminal acts which would allow prosecution” for cyclists who exceed speed limits. Griffiths was killed by Brian Fitzgerald, a director at Credit Suisse, who was cycling at 29mph in the park at the time of the accident.The incident happened six years after the death of Kim Briggs, a 44-year-old mother of two who died a week after suffering “catastrophic” head injuries from being hit by a cyclist in east London in 2016. Charlie Alliston, 20, who was cycling at 18mph on a bike with no front brakes, was cleared by a jury of manslaughter, which would have carried a life sentence.He was found guilty of causing bodily harm by wanton and furious driving, a crime under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. Had Alliston been driving a car at the time of the collision, he could have been prosecuted for causing death by dangerous driving and given a sentence of up to 14 years in prison.Griffiths’s inquest reignited calls to change the law so that causing death or serious injury by “dangerous, careless or inconsiderate cycling” is punishable at the same level as when the offences are committed by motorists.https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/london-duathlon-cancelled-after-series-of-fatal-bike-collisions-f9rqvhn2z

Michael Good ● 365d99 Comments ● 358d

Acton real ale festival

As the Great British Beer Festival has been cancelled this year, we have decided to take up the baton and create a mini version in Acton, with free entry and all welcome.In cooperation with our friends at Portobello Brewery, we have curated  a selection of more than 10 cask ales from a wide range of independent, provincial and micro breweries, with styles including mild, best bitter, porter, IPA, oatmeal stout, real cider and an exotic bohemian dark. Our friends at the Pint of Hops beer shop will be complementing these with a choice of international bottled beers.Were that not enough, we have arranged a panoply of entertainment, with comedy acts on Friday, live music on Saturday, and a charity raffle and table quiz on Sunday to raise funds for Stonewall Housing. There will also be a barbecue on Saturday and Sunday, with V/VG options available.Our core range of rotating cask ales, keg craft lager and cider, Guinness and a rare cherry sour beer, along with fine wines, soft/hot drinks and bar snacks will of course also be on offer. Please join us at the West London Trades Union Club on Friday 30th Aug: 3pm - 11pm. Saturday 31st Aug/Sunday 1st Sept: 12pm - 11pm. You will find us at 33-35 High Street, Acton, W3 6ND (look for the red door!) on the Uxbridge Road.PUBLIC TRANSPORT:From the West, buses SL8, 207, E3, 218, 266, 70, 440 stop at Acton Old Town Hall.From the East, buses SL8, 207, 70, 440, 218 stop at Acton Central Station.On the Overground, Acton Central Station is around 6 minutes away. Turn left out of the station and take the first left down Birkbeck Road. On reaching the main road, we are across and to the right.On the Tube, Acton Town is a 15-minute walk away, or take the E3/70 bus; alternatively, go to Turnham Green and take the E3 bus.For accessibility assistance please see our website: https://wltuc.com/accessWe are looking forward to seeing you! If you have any queries, please email Emily at secretary@wltuc.com.

Patrick Green ● 360d0 Comments ● 360d

Different government approach to LTNs etc

Just read this:https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/tory-clampdown-on-low-traffic-neighbourhoods-to-be-scrapped-5hps96vrc#:~:text=Ministers%20are%20to%20reverse%20Tory,zones%20and%20low%20traffic%20neighbourhoods.If you can't get past the firewall the first few paragraphs are:Tory clampdown on low traffic neighbourhoods to be scrappedLouise Haigh, the transport secretary, says local authorities that want more 20mph zones and LTNs will have her ‘absolute support’Ministers are to reverse Tory plans to clamp down on councils that want to create further 20mph speed limit zones and low traffic neighbourhoods.Louise Haigh, the transport secretary, said local authorities would have her “absolute support” to introduce the schemes in towns and cities. They have often prompted local opposition.She pledged to scrap plans by the previous government that would have restricted councils’ ability to introduce new 20mph zones and make it harder to bring in new low traffic neighbourhoods. She also accused the Conservatives of stoking “really horrific culture wars” with their clampdown on anti-motorist measures, saying that decisions were best taken locally.“They (councils) had the government actively working against them saying ‘no, you’re not allowed to roll out 20mph zones, no you’re not allowed to roll out LTNs’,” she told the Streets Ahead podcast.“Those kinds of decisions should absolutely be made at a local level by communities and not dictated to or stoked by the centre,” she said. “This government has ended all culture wars full stop, but there’s no way you’ll be hearing that from this department now.”The article goes on to say that decisions on these things should be made in the community, so I guess if you live in an LTN and want to get it scrapped, start a petition and get all those in the community to sign (or indeed vice-versa)

Andrew Jones ● 364d16 Comments ● 360d

Hammersmith Bridge  2.9m cycle path delayed to April 25

Article from the Barnes Bugle below. Bridge cycle lane delayed to April 2025Back in May when we shared the news that the Government had provided funding of £2.9 million to upgrade the cycle lane in the middle of Hammersmith Bridge we stated, with no confidence at all, that the central span cycle lane, which was to close at the end of May, was planned to be re-opened in November 2024.We wondered at the time, if we were being unnecessarily snarky when we implied that the November date might not be met, saying ‘or should that be December or January or some unspecified date in 2025?’. But, it is no surprise at all to be revealing that the new proposed date for the opening of the cycle lane is April 2025.Saying ‘told you so’ is always annoying, but the real annoyance lies with pedestrians and cyclists using the narrow walkways along the side of the bridge, who are now going to have to cope with a further six months of sometimes amiable and sometimes not so amiable jostling for space.The news has come after a freedom of information request from local campaign group Hammersmith Bridge SOS, where a response revealed that before the cycle lane can be re-instated the stabilisation works on the bridge’s pedestals needed to be completed (this is expected in November) and Cadent’s work to divert the gas supply on the north side of the bridge needs to be finished.For now, work on the bridge’s piteously pitted and degraded road surface seems to be underway but all cyclists can do is stare at the wonderful wide open road space while they wheel their bikes along the crowded walkways and think wistfully of the freedom of the open road that was granted to them and then snatched away earlier this year. Friction between cyclists and pedestrians increases as the heat rises on the bridgeTempers always seem to get frayed in the heat and perhaps that’s the reason we’ve seen so much argy-bargy between pedestrians and cyclists on the bridge over the past few weeks. Cyclists and scooterists who fail to dismount are the cause of much disgruntlement both to pedestrians and other cyclists who abide by the rules. Frustration at others’ actions get too much for some people sometimes and when they request that cyclists dismount the result is often shouting and quite fruity language. However, more worryingly, we’ve also heard tales of people coming to blows. There are wardens on the bridge but they all they can do is politely request that cyclists and scooterists dismount. As we all know, the wardens’ requests are completely ignored by those who insist on cycling along the walkways and they also seem to be powerless to intervene when interactions between cyclists and pedestrians get fractious.At the Bugle we’re keen to find out more about how pedestrians and cyclists are coping with crossing the bridge and to get readers’ suggestions as to how things can be improved.We would be really grateful if you could contribute your experiences and thoughts by completing our survey. We will pass the responses on to Hammersmith Council and let you know what they say.Take the survey Viability of the Foster Cowi temporary bridge solution not yet knownHammersmith & Fulham Council’s preferred route to the full repair of the bridge is the audacious Foster Cowi bridge-within-a-bridge solution*. It’s all gone very quiet on this recently, particularly as the change in government means funding for any repair beyond stabilisation is uncertain.Perhaps the other reason for the silence is that it’s not yet clear whether the Foster Cowi solution is in fact viable.Part of the assessment of the viability of the bridge-within-a-bridge plan is whether the bridge’s piers (built in 1824) can bear the weight of the existing bridge and some of the Foster-Cowi bridge. Engineers have been drilling into the piers to measure their load bearing abilities, but it seems they won’t have an answer until spring 2025. Perhaps by then we might know if the Labour government is willing to commit to funding one third of the repair cost and granting TfL enough money for it to commit a further third. It will also have to approve Hammersmith & Fulham Council’s proposal for a toll on the bridge for the final third to come into play. *For new readers this solution involves constructing a temporary double decker bridge within the bridge which will allow traffic and pedestrians to use the bridge while the major repair of the structure takes place around them. One of its major advantages is also that it allows some of the reconstruction work to take place off site, as portions of the existing bridge would be removed and then taken away by barge before being mended elsewhere and brought back to be re-instated. Local MPs are lobbying for the full repair of Hammersmith BridgeImage above: Rachel Reeves on left, Lousie Haigh on rightHammersmith MP Andy Slaughter has confirmed his commitment to reopening the bridge in full to traffic, and has said that he and his fellow local MPs will be lobbying Transport Minster Louise Haigh to confirm government support for the bridge's repair. Speaking at a Chamber of  Commerce meeting in Hammersmith Mr Slaughter described the lack of progress on the repair of the bridge as  a national and international embarrassment. While this does seem to improve the prospects of Hammersmith Bridge being repaired in the long term there are still some issues to be overcome. The first impediment will be the government's purse strings which will be tight after Chancellor Rachel Reeves' assertion that the previous Conservative government has left the new administration with a £20 billion fiscal hole. The second is that the actual costs of repairing the bridge are far from clear. Given that the viability of the Foster Cowi solution won't be known until spring next year, it's unlikely that a fair estimate of cost will be in place until mid next year. The Department for Transport is unlikely to write a blank cheque so it looks unlikely that there will be any firm commitment from government until the route forward to repair is more certain. Hammersmith Bridge to completely close for four days this autumnA  crucial part of the bridge’s stabilisation process involves jacking up the bearings of its four pedestals, and this process is planned for each of the pedestals this autumn. While this is being done separately for each pedestal, the bridge will be completely closed for a 24-hour period. We don’t have dates for these closures, but we do know that they are planned to start on Friday evenings after the commuter rush and carry on for 24 hours into Saturday on each occasion.

Adrian Irving ● 379d2 Comments ● 375d

Bikes stolen on the streets of Chiswick for sale in Moscow

From The Chiswick Calendar:wo expensive bikes, stolen from a bike shed in Chiswick, have turned up for sale in Moscow.The thieves stole the bikes during the night, cutting through the metal hasps used to attach the lid to the locks on the base, so the heavy duty locks themselves were not touched. A few doors down, a neighbour had their bike shed broken into in the same way a few nights later.The owner, who The Chiswick Calendar has spoken to, but prefers to remain anonymous, could see from Apple AirTag trackers that the bikes were in another part of London at 4am, but there were no subsequent registrations. AirTags do not work if they are placed inside a metal frame, so they were on the outside of the bikes, and if you knew what to look for they would have been easy enough to find.“Police were notified and I received a crime reference number however no visit from the police themselves and the case was subsequently closed.”He put pictures of the bikes out on social media and a month later received a reply with some photographs and a link to a Russian website with one of the bikes on sale. The notice read:‘Located in the Republic of Belarus, delivery to Moscow, from one to several days, with payment of receipt … can be sent to other cities.’“It is 100% my bike.  It isn’t an off-the-shelf model but a custom build where you can select the components from a range plus supply some of your own, so there won’t be any other bike the same… My other bike is on the same website, you can see the prices listed in roubles.“I think the person replying to the tweet may just be an ordinary person in Russia.  They may have just come across the tweet saying it was stolen and replied.”This may be just one example of widespread theft of expensive cycles by organised crime in London. The Standard reported earlier this year on moped gangs targeting cyclists while they were actually riding, and forcing them off their bikes to take them.According to the report, victims have often been targeted near Regent’s Park between 5am and 7am, before cars are allowed into the park. One cyclist targeted reported two thieves looking over his bike and one saying to the other “it’s on the list”, suggesting they are being stolen to order.Analysis from the Clean Cities Campaign last November suggested that on average 20,000 bikes are reported stolen every year across London, over 50 every day.

Les Wilson ● 379d10 Comments ● 377d