Forum Topics

Jeremy Vine ends cycling commute posts

I've never been a huge fan of Jeremy Vine's approach to cycling with its emphasis on conflict with other drivers and danger to people on a bike. My personal view is that this can be counterproductive and that the best way to encourage people to cycling is to tell them how safe and stress free it generally is even in an urban London environment. That said we'd both agree that the more people that cycle the better and perhaps my approach is dictated more by me wanting to avoid conflict rather than any proper assessment of how effective it is.The question of the legacy of his posts is a tricky one. The reach of Twitter is probably much exaggerated. I don't visit it much now but when I do his posts often pop up. It is likely that the millions of views recorded are from a relatively small bunch of people on each side of the debate getting very worked up about them. There always seemed to be very low engagement for his posts when there clearly was a case of very bad driving but lots of traction when he was essentially aggressively enforcing his right of way and was annoyed a driver had forced him to slow for a fraction of a second.While the abuse that he got was unacceptable, it is not atypical for that seen on Twitter these days with its almost total lack of moderation. He was actively courting controversy so he must have known what was coming but I think he is right to walk away now.Overall, despite my reservations about his methods, I think he has made life safer for cyclists in London. The claim that he has made people hate people on bikes doesn't stand up. The people who describe themselves as cyclists on their social media profile do a good job of generating hostility on their own and they are a tiny sub-set of those who actually ride a bike on a daily basis. My own experience has been that motorists have become much more considerate of cyclists and aware of the rules of the road with regard to bikes over the last decade. That may in part be due to the rise of the Go Pro and awareness that any encounter might be filmed but Jeremy's posts will have served to reinforce that so I think they have served to make our roads safer for all if not actually saved lives.

Mark Evans ● 193d39 Comments ● 190d

VE Day in Chiswick 1945 and celebrations in 2025?

I recall Street Parties in Chiswick after the Second World War.Tressle tables down the middle of the Road in Wolseley Gardens ...with bunting on display too.Hardly a motor car to be seenalong the kerbs in those daysLot's of children and their familieswere enjoying the meagre goodies available at that time. Remember Food Rationing & the FR books to control what you bought!(There was a limit on sweets too until the early 1950s and how we made up for lost goodies then!)Mrs Sheridan at No 37 was the star organiser and her family are still around today. Many of us benefited from the use of the Air Raid shelter in her back garden ... where we enjoyed bread and sugar sandwiches etc.I believe that we had a Street Party on both VE and VJ day ... and Whitehall Park Road had a Street Party too which I attended.It was at the railway end.Life was tough for our parents ...listening out for the Air Raid Siren... and when we did we hid under the iron Morrison Shelter erected in our Parent's bedroom.In February 1944 a bomb had dropped in Wolseley Gardens ... demolishing some 4 houses and killing 5 adults.(no memorial plaque there ...sadly)Mrs Sheridan and her family were 2 houses away from the Bomb. The doddlebug had 10 second's earlier dropped a bomb on the United DiariesDepot in Sutton Lane ...killing some 9 horses.I recall also being taken to the Victoria Embankment, Westminster to watch the mighty VE day processionwhich included Service Men andWomen from all over ... INCLUDING RUSSIA(!) ...as at that time ... we were on the same side.Parties and bunting continued after the War as Service personnelreturned from their postings abroad ... eg Burma. Sadly many never returned. God bless them.

Jim Lawes ● 198d6 Comments ● 190d

1 Burlington Lane Tower

Site: 1 Burlington Lane,Chiswick,W4 2RRDevelopment: Demolition and redevelopment of the site to provide a part-6, part-10 storey building tocreate 132 self contained flats and terrace of 3-storey properties, comprising of residential development,flexible commercial floorspace with associated car parking, private & communal amenity space,landscaping, refuse, cycle and public realm improvements.The Council received observations from you about the above-proposed development and I am nowwriting to tell you that the application will be decided by the Planning Committee on 01/05/2025.The meeting will be held at the Council Offices, Hounslow House, 7 Bath Road, Hounslow TW3 3EB.The meeting will be viewable to watch on a live stream on the council’s YouTube page from 7.00pm onthe date of the meeting which is the starting time for the meeting.Confirmation of the start time and a link to the meeting will be available on the council’s web page:http://democraticservices.hounslow.gov.uk/mgCommitteeDetails.aspx?ID=595To make sure that the application has been included on the agenda for the meeting, you can log ontowww.hounslow.gov.uk and follow the links from 'Your Council and Elections'( https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/info/20044/councillors_and_democracy ) You will also be able to see theplanning officer’s report to the committee. The full agenda, with reports, is normally available to view aminimum of seven days before the date of the meeting. Any of the public libraries in Hounslow boroughcan provide access to the Hounslow Council website. Alternatively you can contact the CommitteeAdministrator, Bill Lee on 020 8583 2068 or by email at william.lee@hounslow.gov.ukThe meeting will be open to the public.Speakers are only allowed to address the Committee in particular circumstances. If you would still like toattend the meeting to speak, please contact the Committee Administrator, Bill Lee on 020 8583 2068 oremail william.lee@hounslow.gov.uk by 12 noon on the Friday before the Committee date. Further detailson how to attend the meeting will be forwarded to all persons registered.If you wish only to watch the meeting, you are encouraged to use the livestream already mentioned.However, in accordance with legislation, the Council will be making a number of seats available forpublic viewing of this meeting.If you send any further information to the Councillors on the Committee, please also provide the planningofficer with an electronic copy. If you don’t do this then the planning officer may not be able to answerquestions (or offer solutions) when Councillors raise your concerns about the application during itsdiscussion at the meeting. If it is not submitted to planning officers electronically at least a day before themeeting, it will not be able to be displayed. You are advised that no account can be taken of additionalinformation received on the day of committee.Very occasionally an application can be withdrawn from the Committee agenda after its publication. Ifyou are intending to be at the meeting you may wish to contact Bill Lee on 020 8583 2068 on the day ofthe meeting to check that the application is still being heard.Yours faithfullyPlanning Services

Chris Lucy ● 200d15 Comments ● 191d

London Marathon 2025 in aid of Missing People

Hello Chiswick!My name is Ella and I'm a born and bred local running London Marathon 2025 in aid of Missing People. I've had the privilege of working for the charity for 18 months, and in a mission to reach my target, I'm reaching out to my neighbours to ask for their support.Missing People (originally the National Missing Persons Helpline) was created in response the disappearance of estate agent, Suzy Lamplugh, from Fulham in July 1986. Over 30 years since registering as a charity, Missing People's office is still in East Sheen. If you would like to support, please donate here: https://2025tcslondonmarathon.enthuse.com/pf/ella-mccallum - social media shares would also be a huge help, as I understand that financial support is not always possible.What your donations means:£11 could answer a call from someone in a mental health crisis, providing the support and reassurance they desperately need.£25 could send a TextSafe message to 5 missing children, scared and alone and at risk of harm, offering free, confidential support and help to stay safe.£50 could provide specialist counselling to a family living in limbo when a loved one has gone missing.Our vision is for every missing child and adult, and every loved one left behind, to find help, hope and a safe way to reconnect.A person is reported missing every 90 seconds in the UK, that's a staggering 170,000 missing people every year. As the only charity lifeline for anyone affected by a person going missing, we want to ensure we have the best chance to find all of these people. Ella x

Ella McCallum ● 236d7 Comments ● 195d

When is a crime not a crime?

Last week I was walking home with my daughter and we cut through the stretch of Acton Lane that passes by the Stag Pub and Kitchen Network takeaway.All of a sudden 4 men on two motorized scooters, whizzed by us, jumped off and began attacking a white car with clubs. They were smashing the car and attempting to club the driver who was frantically trying to reverse out of Berrymede Road (which he did, knocking over a young tree), eventually driving off. A fifth helmeted delivery driver ran out of the Kitchen Network and joined in with "his friends". Smashing the careening car.My young daughter was distraught, as it was very violent and scary, and in fact I contemplated trying to capture a license plate on my phone but it was so intense I was scared I might be seen and turned on so I walked her back away from the scene (there were others looking out of local shops at what was going on).Afterwards, I reported the incident to the police online, with as much detail as I could.However to my disappointment I got a response the next day saying that the incident was not considered a crime and so would not be recorded.Given the extreme level of violence (my daughter now keeps asking me if she's safe), I am angry that this is dismissed and presumably not recorded in any official figures. While no-one was killed, surely attacking people (presumably thus is a gang in gang fight) should not be tolerated and normalised? What kind of message does this send? Am I wrong?

Tim Mackinnon ● 297d21 Comments ● 275d

Taking a bus in London? It might be quicker to walk

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/taking-a-bus-in-london-it-might-be-quicker-to-walk-fjs2sc2txThe mayor has been urged to review cycle lane and low-traffic policies after a watchdog revealed that average bus speeds had fallen as low as 6.6mphBus speeds were as low as an average of 6.6mph in central London. A typical jogging speed is about 6 mphTaking the bus from Abbey Road Studios to Tate Britain, for example, a distance of only four miles, was scheduled to take up to one hour and 15 minutes. In the City of London, the financial capital of Britain, average speeds were even slower at just 6.6 mph.The average person walks at about 3mph and jogs at about 6mph, meaning it would be quicker to walk or run than take the bus for many journeys in London, particularly during the busiest periods.A London bus driver, who wished to remain anonymous, said that the replacement of bus lanes with cycle lanes, the introduction of low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), floating bus stops where cycle lanes pass on the inside, 20mph speed limits and pavement widening had combined to increase congestion and slow journeys to a crawl.“Drivers have had enough,” he said. “Today I was meant to have a one-hour lunch but because of congestion it got taken down to 40 minutes, and it was the same yesterday and the day before. Our breaks are also getting shorter thanks to delays. Yet there are fewer cars on the roads. It’s madness. No wonder we’re seeing more bus collisions. Drivers are crashing due to fatigue. The problem is if you speak out you get sacked. It’s depressing.”Analysis of the watchdog’s data by The Times found that nine of the ten London boroughs with the biggest falls in bus speeds had introduced LTNs since 2020 while only three of the ten with the smallest reductions had done so.Critics have said that LTNs in residential areas simply relocate traffic to main roads, adding to congestion and delaying buses.One of the biggest drops in bus speeds was in Hackney, which now has 70 per cent of its roads covered by LTNs.The bus driver said: “The real problem with LTNs is when there are road works or an accident. Then they can have a massive effect on an area because there is no other way out. If other roads were open then cars could get out and that could help buses move a bit more freely but it doesn’t happen.”London TravelWatch said the replacement of bus lanes with cycling lanes and poorly planned roadworks were also delaying journeys.Sonya Dallat, of the watchdog, said: “While we support measures to encourage active travel in London and help reduce air pollution and car use, we want all transport users to be considered. As buses are the only fully accessible mode of public transport, we are urging Transport for London to maintain and not remove bus lanes when implementing new road schemes, as well as to better enforce existing bus lane restrictions, and increase bus lane operating hours.”About five million bus journeys were taken in Greater London each day in the year 2022-23The Times conducted a four-month battle with Transport for London (TfL) to get it to reveal how many bus lanes it had replaced with cycle lanes but it declined to answer, at first arguing the information would be too expensive to obtain and then changing its position to say it did not hold the data.The bus driver said that replacing bus lanes with cycle lanes was a big issue, especially at certain pinch points. “Outside St Paul’s, for example, you used to get to [the road] New Change quite easily and quickly using the bus lane but now you can lose up to 30 minutes trying to turn left towards the Strand — all because the bus lane has gone. It was not even a long bus lane but it was enough to help us.“Since then we’ve also had all these floating bus stops and they can also delay us because if there’s more than one bus coming in, you have to wait while the other unloads whereas before you could all pull in and serve people at the same time.”Cycling campaigners have said investment in cycle infrastructure works because it encourages more people to get on bikes, which is good for their health and reduces pollution. Data from TfL shows that cycling journeys have increased by 20 per cent since 2019.However, critics have argued that the hundreds of millions of pounds spent encouraging cycling has disproportionately benefited those who are already better off.The data from TfL showed that the majority of cyclists were higher-earning, middle-aged men while bus users tended to have lower incomes and higher proportions of women and ethnic minorities. Buses were also the most popular form of public transport in London in the financial year to 2023 with about five million journeys every day. Cycling accounted for only 4.5 per cent of journeys.Vincent Stops, who worked as a policy officer at London TravelWatch for 20 years and as a councillor in Hackney for 16 years, believed that TfL and councils were putting cyclists ahead of bus users. “It’s quite bizarre,” he said. “TfL has a programme of installing bus priority on the one hand, but at the same time taking out key stretches of bus lane for cycle lanes.”The campaign group Social and Environmental Justice called on Khan, the mayor of London, to take action on the decline in the speed of bus journeys.“Buses are the capital’s most widespread and affordable form of public transport,” the group said in a statement. “We call on Sadiq Khan to investigate urgently why bus speeds have slowed at a time when traffic across most of London is still lower than in 2019. Where traffic management schemes such as LTNs are found to be impeding bus journeys, they should be removed as soon as possible. London and Londoners must keep moving.”The bus driver believed that 20mph speed limits and pavement widening were also causing delays. “The narrowing of roads such as Oxford Street is a nightmare because as soon as there is any accident or collision everything comes to a standstill,” he said. “There is no space to keep the road moving. It’s amateurish.“Twenty mile per hour limits are another problem. In the mornings if I start at 4am, the roads are dead but my bus has a system fitted which means I cannot exceed the limit. I get overtaken by cyclists.”Lorna Murphy, the TfL director of buses, said that LTNs allowed more people to walk and cycle. “London’s bus network plays a vital role in enabling people to travel sustainably and affordably and we’re working hard to make it even better,” she said. “This includes investment in new bus lanes and other measures to give buses priority on the roads.“We are also developing more zero-emission buses with innovative features to improve customer experience. We welcome this report from London TravelWatch and are carefully examining its findings.”

Michael Good ● 356d176 Comments ● 288d

2025 Doom and Gloom ?

Ha, not politics I'm afraid but is on many people's minds So what can survive locally in 2025 I have an idea that a very long establishment may not survive. I won't mention the name but my experience yesterday points to it maybe not surviving. I base this on the grounds of the proprietor's language and arguments for and against against me. Why was my shopping experience a heated one? Well, that was based on him pretty much insisting on cash and then telling me it is costing him £1.20 for the card transaction. He then went on to say he was losing customers hand over fist and continued to argue with me. I gave him some advice and that wound him up even more. For starters, if I can pay by card for a £2 pint of milk in a local non-chain newspaper-type convenience store, that points to him maybe not in my view telling the truth or he needs to shop around which was my advice for another card payment Co. Secondly, I said you need to sit down and work out your budget and what you are paying for goods and possibly shop elsewhere and if in places raise your prices. Anyway, it was a little heated but I only went in to purchase something and he insisted on cash. I said I don't carry cash anymore like many people and so he began. As to me not paying with cash, I'm no longer wanted as a customer. And with that and all that was said, I think it's struggling and only time will tell. Maybe others may have had the same reception and know the establishment. I can't be the only one based on what I walked into What annoyed me was it was all my fault for pulling out my card which I have to say have done so over the years in this shop. It's an issue for him and a reason. Thank god my shopping experience over 30 years in Chiswick has only just recently taken a turn. That could be a sign of things to come

Julian Pavey ● 312d23 Comments ● 303d

Health in Cities

The Chief Medical Officer, Professor Whitty, published the annual report on health in cities yesterday. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6756e67b43b2de5fee8dae87/cmo-annual-report-2024-health-in-cities.pdfThere is, of course, a section dedicated to Active Travel starting on page 333. It's really very good and many of the points will be familiar to my personal fan club on this forum. It sets out the case for Active Travel's role in creating healthier urban populations - integrating exercise into our daily movements has numerous health benefits. Then it outlines the barriers and how they need to be overcome. It is a short section and I encourage you all to read it. Here are a few excerpts:On car reduction:  "Reducing private vehicle journeys and car dependency†45 by increasing active travel reduces air and noise pollution and levels of carbon emissions in cities. It also reduces traffic congestion, thereby increasing mobility, accessibility and speed of journeys, increasing productivity and economic benefits, and health equity for households without access to a vehicle.""Over-reliance of private cars is an inefficient use of city space. Supporting people to use active or sustainable travel frees up space for more health and wealth generating activities, e.g. space for play, community amenities, socialising and green spaces, all of which improve the quality of life in our cities."On deterrents to active travel:"Fear of cars and poor driving practices such as speeding are a major deterrent to active travel. Whilst the hierarchy of road users in the Highway Code (Figure 4.61) seeks to protect pedestrian and cyclists as the more vulnerable road users, this is not consistently applied in the design of infrastructure, or enforced. Some examples are when cars park in cycle lanes or when motorists assume they have right of way"

Paul Campbell ● 330d27 Comments ● 321d

Am I going mad or are zebra crossings getting more dangerous?

I’m really noticing more close shaves at zebra crossings in the last year or so. I have no data to back this up, except my own anecdotal evidence. Anyone else notice a trend?It’s not just those on the High Road, but these ones feature heavily. I’ll say at the outset that I’m a cyclist, not a driver, or rather, I ride a bike, don’t drive a car. Taking the bike lane first, bikes haven’t stopped for me, more times than is excusable to be honest. I’m not totally innocent on this front - there has been the very odd occasion when I’ve kept going through a zebra crossing, though this is rare. I now really check both sides of the road for pedestrians about to cross. I think you can also tell as well, when someone has a momentary lapse in awareness, versus people who never intended to stop (rarer) or are cycling at a much lower level of awareness in general (more common). There’s just too many occasions of bikes not stopping, in my view, for these to be explained by momentary lapses. I think it’s rather the case that there are more unaware people on bikes, which I’d put down to the increase in bike sharing programmes, in particular e-bikes like Lime. I’d love for ever increasing numbers of bikes, but I really think people need to have their own bikes, which are suited to their height and weight etc. Most people cannot control Lime bikes sufficiently. Bikes aren’t even the most worrying flouters of the rules at zebra crossings, that’s cars (and motorbikes). Obviously this is much more dangerous and also much more inexcusable. If bikes aren’t stopping at crossings as much as they used to because of more unfamiliar cyclists on the road, there’s no excuse for cars not stopping. It’s hardly the case that there are more inexperienced drivers on the road. I simply think it’s that people don’t care anymore in cars. They just cruise on through crossings. Just now I was a quarter of the way across CHR and one car just cruises through - something that no longer surprises me. Then, however as I got to half way across, straddling both lanes the car behind it also fails to stop. Again, these are anecdotes, with no basis in data, but I’d wager heavily that I’m not the only one seeing things getting worse. Also I make it very clear I’m about to cross the road. I never dart out at an angle or approach the road looking down at my phone. I turn 90 degrees to the crossing and look right, left and right again. Pedestrians are king. Then bikes. Then cars. Rant over. Just getting really tired of this.

Edward Kent ● 349d106 Comments ● 324d

Increased Thames seal sightings could be 'new normal' says expert, as warning issued to Londoners

Dog owners have been asked to keep their pets on leashes...A wildlife expert has issued an appeal to Londoners amid a “sharp increase” in seal sightings in the Thames - which she says is likely to become a “new normal” in the capital.Mary Tester, founding director of Thames Seal Watch, said there has been a sudden surge in seal sightings in the capital as more of the mammals appear to be making their way up the river and “exploring areas of London”.She said she is anxious to avoid a repeat of the 2021 incident in which a beloved seal pup that had been named Freddie by locals had to be put down after being mauled by a dog on the shore near Hammersmith Bridge.She has urged Londoners to keep their distance from seals if they them on shore, and to keep their dogs on leads.“We’re currently seeing a sharp increase in seal sightings in London,” Ms Tester, who is also Thames area coordinator for the British Divers Marine Life Rescue (BDMLR), told The Standard.“Seals have long lived in the river with the latest estuary populations from ZSL counting nearly 600 harbour seals and 3,000 greys.“The newer trend is that they seem to be more regularly exploring areas of London.”There have also been several sightings of dolphins in the Thames in recent months, as far west as Hammersmith.“While there is still no proven reason as to why, it may be a testament to the diverse food sources available to them, with little competition,” said Ms Tester.Stretches of the Thames were declared “biologically dead” by the Natural History Museum in the 1950s but the ZSL says it is now home to 125 species of fish.https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/seals-sightings-thames-river-animals-dogs-warning-london-b1195142.html

Les Wilson ● 353d4 Comments ● 351d

How rogue cyclists have made London’s parks unsafe for children and the elderly

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/16/speeding-cyclists-royal-parks-london-injured/​​Dossier reveals hit-and-runs, riders travelling on illegal bikes and pedestrians being struck so hard they are ‘catapulted’ into the airRichmond Park, which cycling clubs use to record lap speeds, was reported as having the highest number of incidents, along with Regent’s Park Credit: PA/AlamyThe full threat posed to pedestrians by dangerous and illegal cycling in the country’s best-known parks can be revealed by The Telegraph for the first time.The Royal Parks, which runs eight London parklands, has released a dossier of collision data showing how the elderly, the partially sighted and children have been knocked down and injured by cyclists.The file, released under freedom of information laws, logs “speeding” and “aggressive” cyclists being involved in hit-and-runs, ignoring zebra crossings, travelling on illegal bikes and hitting pedestrians so hard they are “catapulted” into the air.Richmond Park and Regent’s Park, which cycling clubs use to record lap speeds, were reported as having the highest number of incidents.The document includes how Brian Fitzgerald, a Credit Suisse director, collided with Hilda Griffiths, 81, as she walked her dog in Regent’s Park in 2022, causing “life-changing injuries”.The Muswell Hill Peloton cyclist, riding at 29mph in a 20mph zone, could not be prosecuted because speed limits do not apply to bikes. Mrs Griffiths died two months later from her injuries.The dossier shows another pedestrian suffered two broken ribs after being hit by a cyclist “doing laps” after he failed to “look properly” when crossing a nearby road a few months earlier.Last year, a cyclist reported feeling “unsafe” because peloton cyclists were “riding on his wheel”.However, the file is not exhaustive and does not include Paola Dos Santos, 52, who suffered severe facial injuries when hit by a cyclist on the wrong side of the road.In Richmond Park in February, a cyclist on a fixed-wheel bike struck a pedestrian “at speed” on a “busy” path with a 10mph speed limit. The bike, which had no front brake, is banned in the parks and “not road legal”, the file says.In August, a pedestrian was taken to hospital with “multiple serious injuries to arm, head and hip” by a “speeding cyclist” who then “fled the scene”.The file includes a letter from a runner who said he would no longer visit the park because “it is becoming so dangerous”.He added: “I’ve on four occasions nearly been hit by a speeding bike. It’s all well and good saying pedestrians have priority but it’s clear that many cyclists (not all of course) are not adhering to this rule.”In January, a cyclist was attacked by another cyclist who was “throwing punches and kicking them on the ground”.In the past four years, Richmond Park had numerous reports of cyclists going “at least 30mph”, “full pelt” or “out of control”.In 2020, a partially sighted pedestrian was “knocked to the ground” by a cyclist who had his “head down because of the wind”. A “very fast” cyclist “on the wrong side of the road crashed head-on into another cyclist”.In Hyde Park in September, a pedestrian was “thrown to the ground” suffering face, wrist and knee injuries after being “struck” by a cyclist near the Serpentine. A year earlier, a pedestrian was taken to hospital suffering dizziness after being “hit” by a Lime bike near Speakers’ Corner.In Kensington Gardens this July, a child was found “bleeding a lot” after being “badly hit by a teenager riding an electric Lime bike” near the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Playground Since the summer of 2020, there have been reports of “near misses” near Kensington Palace, where bikes are banned.A Royal Parks volunteer was “knocked down” and left “shaken” because the cyclist “was shouting and being generally aggressive”.In St James’s Park a pedestrian was hit by a cyclist who “failed to stop at a red signal” – police were called. Then, close to the Mall, a cyclist among a group of 30 “collided with a pedestrian” who “sustained a head injury”.In Bushy Park, a cyclist repeatedly rode their bike into a herd of deer, “causing them to stampede” and scaring other visitors.Gerard Griffiths, the son of Hilda Griffiths, said the dossier illustrated the “alarming attitude of some cyclists”, adding how he fears many more incidents go unreported.He welcomed the Royal Parks’ request to ministers to try to find a legal route to make the parks’ 20mph speed limits apply to cyclists.A source at the Department for Culture Media and Sport, which has Government responsibility for the parks, said: “We have received a proposal to improve safety for park users from the Royal Parks and are considering it.”A Royal Parks spokesman said although cycling has a “deep-rooted history” in the city’s parklands, “the speeds that can now be achieved when cycling in such populated spaces bring new challenges that we are committed to addressing”.She added that the charity had reviewed its policies following “several cycling-related incidents linked to a minority of people cycling at excessive speeds” and had “implemented physical changes in the parks, including larger or wider pedestrian paths, additional crossing points to improve pedestrian safety and additional signage”.She continued: “The parks are shared spaces where pedestrians, cyclists and wildlife coexist, and we have a responsibility to all park users to ensure we are acting in a way that protects and promotes their safety. We continue to work closely with cycling groups, community groups and the Met Police to do all we can to ensure the parks can be enjoyed safely by everyone, now and in the future.”

Michael Good ● 357d6 Comments ● 356d