Forum Topic

Sorry, Philippa. Who exactly on this thread is anti-bike?Every single post has criticized a policy that has just reduced the number of bikes available. A policy that has removed ease of access for everyone across London. A policy that makes it impossible for children and medical staff to avail themselves of e-bike hire to cycle seamlessly from one borough to the next. Is this something you support? Even the London Cycling Campaign has criticized it. Are they anti-bike now? Hounslow itself, has commented on a lack of a city-wide solution as has just about everyone on this thread. Is Hounslow Council anti-bike? Odd you seem to be anti-accountability.Availability - aside from being reduced - is pointless when the vehicles available are not fit for purpose. I can cycle to the border of Chiswick. That's a half mile from home. What's the point?What needs tweaking is the entirety of the what's on offer. That starts at the top with the Mayor and TfL. Local councils were given a long leash. They all failed miserably.By default, Lime stepped in and exploited the weaknesses in the so-called system and became the de facto city-wide solution for e-bike hire. They succeeded where the Mayor, TfL, local councils and quite possibly national government has failed. Lime achieved what millions upon millions of public funds could not in large part because paid officials got in their own way. The both got their way, but then got in the way of that. They had the power, the clout, the funds, the thuggery of social media behind them. They facilitated and created this mess with our money. This is entirely on Labour. Like it or not. They have now prevented Lime from providing all of London the only city-wide solution for e-bikes. A situation Labour enabled. Services which were allowed to grow and evolve with Labour's blessing and now Labour has revoked them. It's utterly nuts.How you yourself don't whinge at that is also nuts. It's your money. It's everyone's money. And Lime just wiped the floor with it because Labour let them.

David Lesniak ● 23d

One of the things that makes me chuckle (for the wrong reasons) is the number of times over the years we've heard the argument "but they will cycle."When Chiswick Cinema was first arriving it was a parking issue with nearby residents. And they were told "but they will cycle" with cycling PSAs supposedly appearing on movie screens.When LBH/TfL removed parking for the cycle lane and people from all sectors were concerned about parking being removed we were told "but they will cycle."  Ditto when the markets arrived and removed a swath of parking on Sundays not only for their stalls but for their traders we were told "but they will cycle." Personally I find that ironic because it's a "parking is okay for us, just not for you scenario" as is the council subsidizing parking for market traders but not subsidizing it for permanent traders. Dominos uses street space for free (they're worth billions), permanent traders can buy a yearly permit for upwards of £800 and then market traders pay a mere pittance. All for access to the same council amenity. But I digress.Back on point, now people won't cycle.Because they can't.To your point about the Ealing border, I've seen pictures of Lime bikes blocking in cars and access to homes in that neck of the woods. Likely exacerbated by the festivals at Gunnersbury which no doubt attract a demographic more likely to cycle than most. What daft thinking to remove Lime bikes from peak event season and remove access to a venue you yourselves opened to generate revenue. I can't wait until school starts up again and families who have no clue about this change will suddenly have those issues to face. How would I student cycle to Barnes? You can't even cycle to Latymer. And there are plenty of Arts Ed kids who use the Lyric for classes.I still maintain this development is largely because those in charge cannot perform to task. As usage evolves, Hammersmith council responds accordingly and in a timely manner. They don't throw their toys out of the pram and stomp their feet and ask for democracy to stop. Yes, Katherine Dunne, I'm speaking about your repeated attempts to silence feedback. I'm also speaking of what I believe is your ineptitude to rise to the occasion. You are clearly out of your league and you just demonstrated that. As did the rest of the council for letting you do so.

David Lesniak ● 27d

Unfortunately, Guy, that link has incorrect info with regard to Forest.In their own app as of this week, a Forest subscription costs £70. As mentioned, that gets you 1000 minutes. Like it or not. Use it or not. Their bikes don't have the breadth of service that Lime does. Why risk the £70?Lime, by comparison, is £8.99 per month. And then you sort out your minute bundles as you wish to fit your budget and needs.I saw Forest bikes clustered in front of High Road Brasserie this morning, left by the vendor where they shouldn't have been. Easy to tell given how the front wheels are knitted together in a way only a vendor can do. For a GPS-based app, it always amuses me when the vendors themselves can't figure out where to put things. Add to that, just aim for the blue "P" but no. They missed the mark. So less than a week in and we already see a Forest fail. Let's be honest, it's not as if there are a thousand places along the High Road they can go. How hard is it to find the half-dozen or so? This morning I found a Lime in Chiswick so I opted to try it to see what would happen. Unlocked as normal, asked me to verify as it does at that hour and off I went. I got about two blocks away and the battery sputtered. Not to the degree the Voi bike battery died out, but pedalling became more difficult. But not enough to discourage me. Like climbing a hill. Once I crossed Goldhawk it was free sailing.Regarding the point of usage made by others...I have a meeting in Hounslow central Monday evening. I have a class in Kensington before that. I would have easily tried a Lime for that distance and have enjoyed it. I will not take a Forest. The bike simply doesn't fit me nor vice versa. I see no point being uncomfortable for the nearly 40 minute ride projected. It's like running a marathon in the wrong size shoe. Why risk the injury? Why have the discomfort?Katherine Dunne has removed the fun and habit of using these services. She has created a second thought where there didn't need to be one. And in the process she has interrupted the comings and goings of people who otherwise would have easily taken a bike. But now they will drive. As I will to Hounslow on Monday evening. She scuttled the cycling project by not being able to manage it's growth and evolution. Other boroughs are managing. Why can't Hounslow? Why can't she?

David Lesniak ● 29d

Julian is correct. Unless you buy a pass, Forest Bikes are significantly more expensive from the get go. Without a pass, Voi is half the price of Forest. Voi has zero unlocking fee and only 19p per mile. With Forest you have to pay £1.90 before you start to pedal plus the 29p per mile (£1 to unlock and 90p for service - or just because as I see it). And you have to pay again for each time you want to unlock a bike for subsequent trips. A round trip to/from wherever will cost you £2.90 in service fees exclusive of mileage. Another pertinent example: a Forest subscription is £70; a Lime subscription £8.99. With Lime you then add minutes as you wish to suit your means and need. That Forest subscription gets you 1000 minutes. Period. A risky proposition given they are a second tier provider and their bikes are not always available the way others are in other boroughs. Ergonomically Forest are inferior for taller people. It's like riding a kid's bike even when the seat is at the highest setting. So what was an enjoyable ride on a Lime is now unpleasant on a Forest.Voi Bikes are not allowed in Hammersmith. And the motor dies out when you cross Goldhawk Road. You can't leave the bike in Hammersmith. You have to double back into Chiswick to park it. Slogging along without the battery. Voi bikes are allowed in Kensington and beyond. So the patchwork approach doesn't work. That's not on Hounslow, per se, but it is on them not to have taken this into account when selling us "economics" and "choice." There is none. It is a monopoly for Forest for anyone wishing to ride west of Goldhawk Road. And they are the most expensive of the options. You'll note there is no discussion re Santander. Although I saw recently there was. Twice we engaged on that front. Once with Santander direct when we first arrived in Chiswick when we were told there wasn't enough demand. Then during the cycle debate where we were accused of being anti-cycling when in fact what we were asking was where are the Santander bikes in this expensive proposition called CS9 or whatever its called these days. As for Guy's comment, you can easily tell which is a scooter and which is a bike on the Voi app. If there is only a number showing, zoom in and it will tell you how many of each option is at that location. Usually scooters. So the track record for Hounslow is they have given access to a mere 20% of provisions for e-hire schemes. This after TfL spent millions  to connect town centers. Katherine Dunne, et al, disconnected town centers and reduced the number of bikes because they couldn't manage the challenge. They simply couldn't handle the volume. So their choice was to reduce the volume. Not a very sustainable proposition for future growth by any measure. And now we have the Lime report about the uptick of riders on Hammersmith Bridge. Sadly, none of those potential customers will make it to Chiswick.From a user perspective, the Forest app is full of promotions and ads galore. And that's with a subscription. It always takes two tries to get a bike. And they do that inane bit of taking a deposit and refunding it after each ride. So you then get the bank alerts as well. All I want is the bike. Not the rest of the garbage they send my way. Voi I walked up and got it. Simple. Lime was the same but in the early hours they double check to see if you're fit to ride so one additional click is needed. In case anyone is curious, I have used all three apps and services. I am a Lime customer as my day-to-day takes me to Chiswick, Hammersmith and Kensington. I now have two subscriptions to cover my bases. A needless increase in expenses.And yes, I still think the cycleway is garbage. Poorly designed, and poorly signed. But thank heavens for those professional TfL designers everyone was going on about. They managed to create a flooded cycleway when it drizzles. Bravo.

David Lesniak ● 30d