Forum Topic

Why then if Hounslow is resorting to squeezing planning applications to get their grubby hands on the CIL that a development attracts, can they justify this absolute tripe and colossal waste of money on yet more consultants spouting piles of B/S in some sort of 'corporate' speak understood by very few normal people?Hounslow Council...Collective imagination is about groups of people coming together to imagine and build the places they want to be part of. This practice is about moving beyond fixing what is broken and seeking new horizons, new worlds and new ways of being. This article ‘What is collective imagination, and how is it different?’ provides useful context and detail on the practice of imagining together.Local authorities and communities are increasingly looking for ways to unlock capacity for the big challenges we’re trying to tackle. Across the UK and beyond we’ve already seen some trailblazing collective imagination practice happening in local areas — like the Camden Imagines project embedding “municipal imagination activism” in their council; and policy makers coming together in an Interspecies Council at The River Roding.In this Huddle we’ll gather a number of collective imagination practitioners based in London, a selection of community and organisation leaders in the Hounslow area, and folk working in Hounslow Council. Together we will pool skills, resources and networks to:Create community-owned visions of the future;Explore big and challenging questions affecting communities in an expansive way, for example around care, ageing, learning, housing and work;Look back as well as forwards to acknowledge and include our individual and collective histories in the making of our futures;Include humans and the more-than-human world in our visioning;Explore how future visioning can support relationship building, decision making and action in the present.MORE HERE: https://medium.com/.../imagining-together-in-hounslow-an...

Vanessa Smith ● 30d

The scenario you outline requires us to believe that the expensively assembled design team didn’t spot a way to enhance the value of the development by taking out parking space. This boost to their income only became possible when a Hounslow councillor, with presumably zero experience in the sector, pointed out their error and forced them to make the amendment.Perhaps a better way to look at this is the price premium that a flat with a parking space normally attracts in this part of west London. The consensus on this seems to be somewhere in the range of £30,000 to £50,000. With the relatively low PTAL score of the Burlington Lane scheme you might expect it to be higher than that but if there is no actual space but a place on a car stacker, let’s just assume for now the premium is right at the lower end. This gives a lost value of around £1million for the 32 spaces foregone. It would be naïve in the extreme to not conclude that the developers will ask for this to be incorporated into the feasibility report which determines the number of affordable units. The report would be drawn up by a third party but they will be using the same industry assumptions as above. The amount would imply the net loss of three affordable units.Hounslow Council are unlikely to object to this and in fact they may be powerless to do so. Cllr Bruce inadvertently let slip what is driving the decision making behind this – it is the millions the council is set to receive through the Community Infrastructure Levy. I don’t blame the administration for this as some way has to be found to cover the budget shortfall but it did mean that the planning committee was willing to sign off on a tiny amount of affordable flats and now, due to the idiocy of one councillor, this number is likely to fall further.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 32d