Forum Topics

London’s Royal Parks demand 20mph limit for cyclists after spate of crashes

London’s Royal Parks demand 20mph limit for cyclists after spate of crashesNew legislation would make it possible to prosecute cyclists just like motorists for speeding on park roads shared by allThe charity responsible for London’s Royal Parks has written to ministers demanding they create new laws to make cyclists obey 20mph speed limits.In a move that threatens the way some cyclists use the capital’s outdoor spaces as velodromes, The Royal Parks is seeking new legislation so cyclists can be prosecuted for speeding just like motorists in their parks.It follows a spate of serious injuries connected to cycling, including the death of Hilda Griffiths, 81, who died after being hit by a speeding cyclist in Regent’s Park in June 2022.Her inquest was told that police did not prosecute the cyclist, riding at 29mph in a 20mph zone, because speed limits do not apply to bikes.Lloyd Grossman, the chairman of The Royal Parks, has now written to Sir Chris Bryant, the Minister for Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism who has Government responsibility for the parks, requesting that laws are updated.The letter says the charity’s board wants an amendment to The Royal Parks and Other Open Spaces Regulations 1997 “with a view to setting speed limits for cyclists”.He adds: “This will match what is already in place for motor vehicles on our park roads, namely a maximum speed limit of 20mph.“Whilst we recognise there are challenges associated with this request, most notably on enforcement, we believe it is a change that would improve safety within the parks for both cyclists and other park users.”Any new legislation would affect parks, including Regent’s Park and Richmond Park, where roads have popular cycling routes shared with vehicles and pedestrians.Mrs Griffiths’ son, Gerard, 51, who has campaigned for an update in cycling laws, said: “This is something that should be in place not just for parks but all roads and I would encourage the Government to put speed limits into place for cycling with legislation that gives parity to all road users.”Sean Epstein, the chairman of Regent’s Park Cyclists which represents about 35 cycling clubs and shares safe riding advice with them, said they were working with The Royal Parks on several schemes to promote safe cycling.“In a 2021 FOI request, The Royal Parks confirmed that the motor vehicle speed limit does not apply to cyclists within their parks. We welcome further clarification on this point from the Government,” he said.A Royal Parks spokesman confirmed the letter had been sent, adding: “We have a responsibility to everyone who uses the parks to ensure we are acting in a way that protects and promotes their safety.”A DCMS source said it was right that The Royal Parks “continue to examine ways to improve safety”.She added: “We are aware of a Royal Parks proposal to improve safety for park users and will consider it carefully.”The letter comes after The Royal Parks cancelled a well-organised bike race in Richmond Park amid fears cyclists would exceed the 20mph limit and pose a threat to pedestrians.The charity imposed a 20mph speed limit across all its parks in September 2020.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/19/london-royal-parks-20mph-limit-cyclists-spate-crashes/

Michael Good ● 128d83 Comments ● 123d

Devonshire Road Oyster Whistles in Tune

This Whistling Oyster has barely been cracked open but me and my neighbouring fishy friends just can't stay away. This brilliantly imaginative new harbour for Chiswick's abundant shoal of shellfish and wine lovers is sure to become the new pearl of Devonshire Road. Fishmonger by day and seafood and wine bar by night, it's the brainchild of partners Sasha Mantel and Rob Gillon – in cahoots with well-known local fishmonger John Robinson and his partner Bonnie; the latter duo remembered by hundreds of grateful customers from the days of covid lockdown when they so brilliantly fronted the fish shop in the Turnham Green Terrace. Remember that queue? An Oyster that also whistles is the dream of a new fish and wine emporium - right up there with the best and most important shops in fashionable Devonshire Road. It doesn't just sell fabulous fish, it doubles-up as a licensed seafood bar with seating indoors and out, selling a range of tasty treats alongside an amazing range of British wines.Unlike most fishmongers, the Whistling Oyster doesn't display its fresh fish in the window (that's a prime spot reserved for indoor eating). Cleverly they’ve placed their impressive fish counter towards the back of the shop. Styled and selected by John, it's expertly packed tight with a full range of British (mainly Cornish) fish and shellfish. Strategically placed elsewhere, I could see all the finest accoutrements to fish eating anyone could possibly want - plus carefully selected smoked fish and a small freezer. There's even a state-of-the-art whole salmon dryer (same technique as Macken's use to store their finest ribs of beef). But even if you're not a fan of fish, it's almost worth popping in for the bread alone, sourced from an independent bakery in Fulham. And they also deliver – free locally I believe.Then there's the seafood bar menu, backed up, or rather washed down, by a huge selection of British wines (inc bubbles) or English cider and beer and lager – just about whatever floats your boat. Of course some of it is pricey. But a glass of Winchcombe Downs 2019 Gloucester white is a snip at £6 a glass and there's many other similar choices with full bottles in the £25-£35 range. So, on our several visits so far I've had (not all at the same time) a dozen Jersey oysters which were simply amazing. But don't just take my word for it. Fellow diners and retired W4 food royalty John and Sally Southey, of Chiswick's Southey's Restaurant fame, were also “there for the Jersey's” - and John assured me that, in his view, these really are one of the finest. I also had some wonderful crab, a few langoustine, watched others enjoying a great plate of sardines on toast and tried out (swapped) a few other great oysters from different parts of the country including Cornwall. There's seats for 11 indoors and sixteen outdoors – Thursday to Sunday from 4.00pm to 10.00pm.Sorry to carp on, but this is surely the plaice to be. I'm hooked.

Sean Barton ● 861d35 Comments ● 128d

Volunteers needed

Hi there,I am volunteering with You Me Bum Bum Train (YMBBT).https://www.bumbumtrain.com/I am posting this as we are looking for more volunteers.You Me Bum Bum Train is a world-famous immersive theatre experience that’s loved by so many. We’re gearing up for our next big show in Covent Garden this November, and I’m reaching out because we’d love for you to be part of the fun!We’re offering unpaid volunteer roles that give everyone a chance to dive into every aspect of immersive theatre – from prop-making and set building to performing, stage management, production, admin, lighting and sound. There’s also free training and certification from industry pros, so it’s a fantastic way to gain real-world experience and skills that could lead to jobs in the theatre/creative industry. Many of our past volunteers have landed roles based on what they’ve learned with us.YMBBT is a non-profit, volunteer-led project – it’s all about community and creativity. We work with volunteers  from all walks of life (ages 8 to 80!), and we’d love for you to get involved. People say it’s an “exhilarating, life-changing experience” for everyone who takes part – whether they’re on stage or behind the scenes.Our last show in 2015 was a massive hit – tickets were in higher demand than Glastonbury, with over 120,000 people applying in the first minute! If this sounds like something you would enjoy you can sign up here:https://ymbbt2.knack.com/bumbumworldI can also send you a pdf one pager and The Times review from last time.Or please email me for further informationaliegriffiths@yahoo.co.ukMany thanks, Alie

Alie Griffiths ● 162d0 Comments ● 162d

Hogarth Roundabout - more congestion in Chiswick - please email opposition to TfL's proposals

Hello everyone. This is my first post on here, as it's not my kind of thing usually, but I am astonished at TfL's proposals for Hogarth Roundabout. Sorry if I’m a little late to the party, but my bone of contention is not Church Road (I'll mention it briefly below), but the "Advance Stop Lines" that TfL is proposing on all entrances to the roundabout - these will slow the flow of traffic through the roundabout and cause more congestion on Chiswick Lane (when you try to leave Chiswick) and on the A316 (when you are trying to get home).What is an "Advance Stop Line"?   It's the white box at the front of the traffic lights with a bicycle painted in it that allows cyclists to pull away ahead of cars. I quite like them when I am cycling - in some places they really do improve safety. But they won't on Hogarth Roundabout!Why? Because no cyclists will use them! I cycle this area frequently and every cyclist I have ever seen leaves Chiswick Lane, or the A316, and passes under the roundabout through the underpass (or they use one of the several other underpasses both east and west of the roundabout. So why has TfL put them in its design?  For goodness sake, they have even put Advance Stop Lines in their design across 3 and 4 lanes of the A4! The A4 has a combined cyclepath/pavement along each side of it, which I use regularly - I have never - in decades - seen a cyclist on the main carriageway. What on earth are TfL thinking - it's ideology gone mad!Instead, what these Advance Stop Lines will do is reduce the flow of traffic through the roundabout in each light phase as cars, vans, motorbikes will have further to travel before they reach the roundabout. This will cause more congestion on Chiswick Lane and the A316 in particular.  Chiswick Lane is already frequently backed up to the High Road; the A316 backs up past Cavendish and Chiswick schools frequently. What TfL proposes will only make getting out of Chiswick even worse, and pour even more pollutants into these school sites.  Frankly, I think it's one of the most stupid things I have ever seen a government propose (and after the last lot that takes something!).  TfL is actually going to spend money on something that will never be used and overall make things worse!So, please send a short email to TfL (haveyoursay@tfl.gov.uk) opposing their plans to put "Advance Stop Lines" on Hogarth Roundabout.Thank you. I hope I don't attract the opprobrium of the cycling lobby who seem to lurk on these pages, but surely even they use the underpass too?!As for Church Street, I can't see why they can't add a fourth lane to the A4 turning left into the A316 and still have a direct access and exit from Church Street.  TfL's proposal seems dangerous to me - anyone turning into the new Church Road entrance will stop or slow all traffic on the A316 (which it doesn't presently), which will then back up onto the roundabout - the most dangerous part of Hogarth Roundabout in my view is when traffic queueing to reach the A316 forces eastbound A4 traffic down to 2 lanes on the roundabout - that's quite scary and will potentially be worse with the TfL proposal.And for what it's worth - why are they adding more cycle parking and benches? Are they expecting the roundabout to become a destination?! Put the benches in and the cycle parking near Chiswick House please and stop wasting money!Honestly, I don't know what's going on at TfL - maybe they gave this one to the summer intern to do!

Nigel Williams ● 175d32 Comments ● 163d

Children in ULEZ more likely to walk or cycle

A new study has been published which finds that children living in ULEZ are twice as likely to switch to walking and cycling to school and being advantaged by the resulting health benefits.  A few excerpts from the summary: "Among children who took inactive modes at baseline, 42% of children in London and 20% of children in Luton switched to active modes."
"Implementation of clean air zones can increase uptake of active travel to school and was particularly associated with more sustainable and active travel in children living further from school."
"Motorised vehicle use negatively impacts health throughout life, influencing children's physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and contributing to diseases like childhood asthma linked to air pollution. Regular physical activity, crucial for children's healthy growth and mental well-being [1, 2], also plays a vital role in preventing the development of obesity [3], prevalent in 23% of children aged 10–11 in 2022 [4]."
https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7 As motorised vehicle use negatively impact health throughout life it is never too late for anybody to switch to more active modes and get healthier so think about that next time you jump in the car and drive less than two miles to the shops or to drop your kids at school. And definitely think about the negative impact on your kids of driving them around Chiswick.  For some strange reason this study is driving right wing commentators and their dimwitted followers a bit loopy on the internet but I am sure the people of Chiswick are not so fragile ...

Paul Campbell ● 171d45 Comments ● 166d

Richmond Park London Duathlon cancelled amid safety fears over speeding cyclists

The Royal Parks charity has grown increasingly concerned about cyclists’ behaviour after an inquest in May into the death of Hilda Griffiths, 81, a retired teacher who was killed in Regent’s Park, north London, after being struck by a cyclist doing timed laps of the park in 2022.The “full duathlon” course consisted of a 20km run, 77km bike ride then another 10km run. But organisers have been told by park officials that the event cannot go ahead as planned on September 8.Announcing the cancellation, the organisers said: “There have been a number of unforeseen factors this year that have led to this difficult decision, particularly in relation to the operational complexity of producing a multi-sport event.“This includes an increased focus on the security and logistics of cycling events in public spaces which creates significant operational challenges. Our team has been working hard to explore all available options in recent weeks, but we have concluded that we can’t make the event work this year.”In a statement concerning the duathlon, the charity said: “A range of factors, including significant operational challenges, have meant that the London Duathlon will not be going ahead in Richmond Park this year. We will work closely with potential event organisers to determine the future of the event.”In June, two smaller club-organised time-trial events were cancelled over fears riders would break the park’s 20mph speed limit. At the time, the charity said it was “pausing” such events while it reviewed its position on such events.The Richmond Park Time Trials, organised by the London Dynamo cycling club and first held in 2009, provided the only opportunity for cyclists to race against the clock in one of the capital’s royal parks, according to road.cc, a bike news website.The organisers argued that the time trials “pose no harm to anyone” given their 6am start time, when there are few pedestrians and the park is closed to motor vehicles. They added that any alternative routes comprise “mostly busy roads and fast-moving cars”.Organisers of the duathlon said they do not know if the event will be able to go ahead next year.The inquest into Griffiths’s death heard that vehicular speed limits did not apply to bicycles and a police review found that “there were no criminal acts which would allow prosecution” for cyclists who exceed speed limits. Griffiths was killed by Brian Fitzgerald, a director at Credit Suisse, who was cycling at 29mph in the park at the time of the accident.The incident happened six years after the death of Kim Briggs, a 44-year-old mother of two who died a week after suffering “catastrophic” head injuries from being hit by a cyclist in east London in 2016. Charlie Alliston, 20, who was cycling at 18mph on a bike with no front brakes, was cleared by a jury of manslaughter, which would have carried a life sentence.He was found guilty of causing bodily harm by wanton and furious driving, a crime under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. Had Alliston been driving a car at the time of the collision, he could have been prosecuted for causing death by dangerous driving and given a sentence of up to 14 years in prison.Griffiths’s inquest reignited calls to change the law so that causing death or serious injury by “dangerous, careless or inconsiderate cycling” is punishable at the same level as when the offences are committed by motorists.https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/london-duathlon-cancelled-after-series-of-fatal-bike-collisions-f9rqvhn2z

Michael Good ● 188d99 Comments ● 181d

Acton real ale festival

As the Great British Beer Festival has been cancelled this year, we have decided to take up the baton and create a mini version in Acton, with free entry and all welcome.In cooperation with our friends at Portobello Brewery, we have curated  a selection of more than 10 cask ales from a wide range of independent, provincial and micro breweries, with styles including mild, best bitter, porter, IPA, oatmeal stout, real cider and an exotic bohemian dark. Our friends at the Pint of Hops beer shop will be complementing these with a choice of international bottled beers.Were that not enough, we have arranged a panoply of entertainment, with comedy acts on Friday, live music on Saturday, and a charity raffle and table quiz on Sunday to raise funds for Stonewall Housing. There will also be a barbecue on Saturday and Sunday, with V/VG options available.Our core range of rotating cask ales, keg craft lager and cider, Guinness and a rare cherry sour beer, along with fine wines, soft/hot drinks and bar snacks will of course also be on offer. Please join us at the West London Trades Union Club on Friday 30th Aug: 3pm - 11pm. Saturday 31st Aug/Sunday 1st Sept: 12pm - 11pm. You will find us at 33-35 High Street, Acton, W3 6ND (look for the red door!) on the Uxbridge Road.PUBLIC TRANSPORT:From the West, buses SL8, 207, E3, 218, 266, 70, 440 stop at Acton Old Town Hall.From the East, buses SL8, 207, 70, 440, 218 stop at Acton Central Station.On the Overground, Acton Central Station is around 6 minutes away. Turn left out of the station and take the first left down Birkbeck Road. On reaching the main road, we are across and to the right.On the Tube, Acton Town is a 15-minute walk away, or take the E3/70 bus; alternatively, go to Turnham Green and take the E3 bus.For accessibility assistance please see our website: https://wltuc.com/accessWe are looking forward to seeing you! If you have any queries, please email Emily at secretary@wltuc.com.

Patrick Green ● 182d0 Comments ● 182d

Different government approach to LTNs etc

Just read this:https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/tory-clampdown-on-low-traffic-neighbourhoods-to-be-scrapped-5hps96vrc#:~:text=Ministers%20are%20to%20reverse%20Tory,zones%20and%20low%20traffic%20neighbourhoods.If you can't get past the firewall the first few paragraphs are:Tory clampdown on low traffic neighbourhoods to be scrappedLouise Haigh, the transport secretary, says local authorities that want more 20mph zones and LTNs will have her ‘absolute support’Ministers are to reverse Tory plans to clamp down on councils that want to create further 20mph speed limit zones and low traffic neighbourhoods.Louise Haigh, the transport secretary, said local authorities would have her “absolute support” to introduce the schemes in towns and cities. They have often prompted local opposition.She pledged to scrap plans by the previous government that would have restricted councils’ ability to introduce new 20mph zones and make it harder to bring in new low traffic neighbourhoods. She also accused the Conservatives of stoking “really horrific culture wars” with their clampdown on anti-motorist measures, saying that decisions were best taken locally.“They (councils) had the government actively working against them saying ‘no, you’re not allowed to roll out 20mph zones, no you’re not allowed to roll out LTNs’,” she told the Streets Ahead podcast.“Those kinds of decisions should absolutely be made at a local level by communities and not dictated to or stoked by the centre,” she said. “This government has ended all culture wars full stop, but there’s no way you’ll be hearing that from this department now.”The article goes on to say that decisions on these things should be made in the community, so I guess if you live in an LTN and want to get it scrapped, start a petition and get all those in the community to sign (or indeed vice-versa)

Andrew Jones ● 186d16 Comments ● 182d

Hammersmith Bridge  2.9m cycle path delayed to April 25

Article from the Barnes Bugle below. Bridge cycle lane delayed to April 2025Back in May when we shared the news that the Government had provided funding of £2.9 million to upgrade the cycle lane in the middle of Hammersmith Bridge we stated, with no confidence at all, that the central span cycle lane, which was to close at the end of May, was planned to be re-opened in November 2024.We wondered at the time, if we were being unnecessarily snarky when we implied that the November date might not be met, saying ‘or should that be December or January or some unspecified date in 2025?’. But, it is no surprise at all to be revealing that the new proposed date for the opening of the cycle lane is April 2025.Saying ‘told you so’ is always annoying, but the real annoyance lies with pedestrians and cyclists using the narrow walkways along the side of the bridge, who are now going to have to cope with a further six months of sometimes amiable and sometimes not so amiable jostling for space.The news has come after a freedom of information request from local campaign group Hammersmith Bridge SOS, where a response revealed that before the cycle lane can be re-instated the stabilisation works on the bridge’s pedestals needed to be completed (this is expected in November) and Cadent’s work to divert the gas supply on the north side of the bridge needs to be finished.For now, work on the bridge’s piteously pitted and degraded road surface seems to be underway but all cyclists can do is stare at the wonderful wide open road space while they wheel their bikes along the crowded walkways and think wistfully of the freedom of the open road that was granted to them and then snatched away earlier this year. Friction between cyclists and pedestrians increases as the heat rises on the bridgeTempers always seem to get frayed in the heat and perhaps that’s the reason we’ve seen so much argy-bargy between pedestrians and cyclists on the bridge over the past few weeks. Cyclists and scooterists who fail to dismount are the cause of much disgruntlement both to pedestrians and other cyclists who abide by the rules. Frustration at others’ actions get too much for some people sometimes and when they request that cyclists dismount the result is often shouting and quite fruity language. However, more worryingly, we’ve also heard tales of people coming to blows. There are wardens on the bridge but they all they can do is politely request that cyclists and scooterists dismount. As we all know, the wardens’ requests are completely ignored by those who insist on cycling along the walkways and they also seem to be powerless to intervene when interactions between cyclists and pedestrians get fractious.At the Bugle we’re keen to find out more about how pedestrians and cyclists are coping with crossing the bridge and to get readers’ suggestions as to how things can be improved.We would be really grateful if you could contribute your experiences and thoughts by completing our survey. We will pass the responses on to Hammersmith Council and let you know what they say.Take the survey Viability of the Foster Cowi temporary bridge solution not yet knownHammersmith & Fulham Council’s preferred route to the full repair of the bridge is the audacious Foster Cowi bridge-within-a-bridge solution*. It’s all gone very quiet on this recently, particularly as the change in government means funding for any repair beyond stabilisation is uncertain.Perhaps the other reason for the silence is that it’s not yet clear whether the Foster Cowi solution is in fact viable.Part of the assessment of the viability of the bridge-within-a-bridge plan is whether the bridge’s piers (built in 1824) can bear the weight of the existing bridge and some of the Foster-Cowi bridge. Engineers have been drilling into the piers to measure their load bearing abilities, but it seems they won’t have an answer until spring 2025. Perhaps by then we might know if the Labour government is willing to commit to funding one third of the repair cost and granting TfL enough money for it to commit a further third. It will also have to approve Hammersmith & Fulham Council’s proposal for a toll on the bridge for the final third to come into play. *For new readers this solution involves constructing a temporary double decker bridge within the bridge which will allow traffic and pedestrians to use the bridge while the major repair of the structure takes place around them. One of its major advantages is also that it allows some of the reconstruction work to take place off site, as portions of the existing bridge would be removed and then taken away by barge before being mended elsewhere and brought back to be re-instated. Local MPs are lobbying for the full repair of Hammersmith BridgeImage above: Rachel Reeves on left, Lousie Haigh on rightHammersmith MP Andy Slaughter has confirmed his commitment to reopening the bridge in full to traffic, and has said that he and his fellow local MPs will be lobbying Transport Minster Louise Haigh to confirm government support for the bridge's repair. Speaking at a Chamber of  Commerce meeting in Hammersmith Mr Slaughter described the lack of progress on the repair of the bridge as  a national and international embarrassment. While this does seem to improve the prospects of Hammersmith Bridge being repaired in the long term there are still some issues to be overcome. The first impediment will be the government's purse strings which will be tight after Chancellor Rachel Reeves' assertion that the previous Conservative government has left the new administration with a £20 billion fiscal hole. The second is that the actual costs of repairing the bridge are far from clear. Given that the viability of the Foster Cowi solution won't be known until spring next year, it's unlikely that a fair estimate of cost will be in place until mid next year. The Department for Transport is unlikely to write a blank cheque so it looks unlikely that there will be any firm commitment from government until the route forward to repair is more certain. Hammersmith Bridge to completely close for four days this autumnA  crucial part of the bridge’s stabilisation process involves jacking up the bearings of its four pedestals, and this process is planned for each of the pedestals this autumn. While this is being done separately for each pedestal, the bridge will be completely closed for a 24-hour period. We don’t have dates for these closures, but we do know that they are planned to start on Friday evenings after the commuter rush and carry on for 24 hours into Saturday on each occasion.

Adrian Irving ● 202d2 Comments ● 198d

Bikes stolen on the streets of Chiswick for sale in Moscow

From The Chiswick Calendar:wo expensive bikes, stolen from a bike shed in Chiswick, have turned up for sale in Moscow.The thieves stole the bikes during the night, cutting through the metal hasps used to attach the lid to the locks on the base, so the heavy duty locks themselves were not touched. A few doors down, a neighbour had their bike shed broken into in the same way a few nights later.The owner, who The Chiswick Calendar has spoken to, but prefers to remain anonymous, could see from Apple AirTag trackers that the bikes were in another part of London at 4am, but there were no subsequent registrations. AirTags do not work if they are placed inside a metal frame, so they were on the outside of the bikes, and if you knew what to look for they would have been easy enough to find.“Police were notified and I received a crime reference number however no visit from the police themselves and the case was subsequently closed.”He put pictures of the bikes out on social media and a month later received a reply with some photographs and a link to a Russian website with one of the bikes on sale. The notice read:‘Located in the Republic of Belarus, delivery to Moscow, from one to several days, with payment of receipt … can be sent to other cities.’“It is 100% my bike.  It isn’t an off-the-shelf model but a custom build where you can select the components from a range plus supply some of your own, so there won’t be any other bike the same… My other bike is on the same website, you can see the prices listed in roubles.“I think the person replying to the tweet may just be an ordinary person in Russia.  They may have just come across the tweet saying it was stolen and replied.”This may be just one example of widespread theft of expensive cycles by organised crime in London. The Standard reported earlier this year on moped gangs targeting cyclists while they were actually riding, and forcing them off their bikes to take them.According to the report, victims have often been targeted near Regent’s Park between 5am and 7am, before cars are allowed into the park. One cyclist targeted reported two thieves looking over his bike and one saying to the other “it’s on the list”, suggesting they are being stolen to order.Analysis from the Clean Cities Campaign last November suggested that on average 20,000 bikes are reported stolen every year across London, over 50 every day.

Les Wilson ● 202d10 Comments ● 199d

Why do we have Europe's most congested roads?

I don't think the Inrix report featured in the front page article is going to surprise many people. It not a big assumption to say that if London is Europe's most congested city that the roads in this part of west London are the worst in Europe for traffic.The really concerning thing is that there is every indication that things are going to get worse. Heathrow is clearly part of the issue and the airport, which is operating at record passenger levels, wants to grow further. There is a massive amount of building proposed along the A4/M4 corridor and, I believe, a similar amount along the A40. Claims that 'car free' developments don't generate extra traffic are delusional.There is some hope that planning gain from all these developments will deliver some new rail links but these would be a decade off. Similarly, confirming investment in new signalling for the Piccadilly line could mitigate the problem but if Labour was committed to that, it would have been mentioned in the manifesto.Ultimately, the only way to stop the problem getting worse and worse is to end the current policy of trying to concentrate housing starts in already densely populated areas of London and recognising that parts of the green belt need to be built on. The cost of ensuring that  west London's road infrastructure doesn't grind to a halt may be a switch of the emphasis of development to sleepy Buckinghamshire towns which have been given an Elizabeth Line stop. It looks like Labour is thinking that way when they mention liberalising planning laws.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 243d53 Comments ● 227d

Disappearing Police Stations

Below is an article from today's Standard which may come as no surprise but still shocking."The scandal of London's disappearing police stationsFifteen years ago, the capital had 160 police stations, but that has been cut sharply to just 36. A new study argues the changes have had a worrying effect on violent crimeWILL LONDON’S LAST POLICE STATION PLEASE TURN OUT THE LIGHTCHRISTIAN ADAMSROBBIE GRIFFITHS4 HOURS AGOThe police office is now closed to the public” reads a sign on a run-down building in Walthamstow high street. For anyone who wants to speak to the police, it suggests Chingford, roughly four miles away, and adds: “Please call 999 if you have an emergency.” A shopkeeper a few doors down shrugs. “It’s been closed for a long time,” he says. A bigger station nearby shut in 2011, following an arson attack.They are two of more than a hundred police stations that have been closed in London over the past decade and a half. So forgotten are the capital’s police stations that Westminster councillors last month granted planning permission to demolish a former site in Savile Row, and replace it with a development that will include an academy for apprentice tailors.Recommended byIn 2008, London had 160 open police station counters. But the Standard can reveal that the number is now 36, meaning more than 75 per cent have closed. For comparison, the city has around 180 McDonald’s. Many stations have been sold, while a few have become staff use only. The figure is set to go even lower, with a plan to have only one in each of the 32 boroughs. A new academic study suggests the closures have led to a significant negative effect on the most serious crimes.The closures have doubled the average distance to the nearest police station for Londoners — from about a mile to roughly two. Around the country, more than 600 out of 900 police stations in England have shut. However, London has been hit the hardest.Opinions differ on who is responsible. In their mayoral campaigns, successive Tory candidates Shaun Bailey and Susan Hall both blamed Mayor Sadiq Khan, and posed outside police stations that he had supposedly closed. However, only 73 police stations were still open when Khan became Mayor — most were shut under predecessor Boris Johnson.SOUTHWARK POLICE STATION, WHICH IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLICDANIEL HAMBURY/STELLA PICTURES LTDBattles over police stations regularly erupt in the capital. During last year’s Uxbridge and South Ruislip by-election, after Johnson stood down as MP, Khan promised to save Uxbridge police station three weeks before the vote — though Labour still lost.Campaigners have also been fighting to save old police station buildings for community use, rather than selling them to developers, including in Teddington and Notting Hill. In April, Hall stood on the site of a former police station in Eltham and announced she would invest £200 million in policing if elected. She said that in all 32 boroughs she would put in two bases, though not all would have had police counters. She went on to lose.In fact, the closures mostly stem from decisions made by central government. Austerity cuts across departments were made by David Cameron’s Coalition, with their Comprehensive Spending Review of 2010. That meant that London’s police had to cut their budget by around a quarter by 2016. Within those guidelines, the then mayor Johnson and the Met Police chose to cut police stations, in order not to lose frontline officers. They hoped for savings from reduced running costs and fewer backroom staff, and to make cash by selling valuable real estate.In some ways, the focus on officers has had results, as the number of Met officers is reportedly at record levels. Mayor Khan has continually focused on the police: the lion’s share of his council tax increases in the past two years have been spent on funding officers. But solid planning has been lacking. The Met has long claimed it will publish an “estates strategy” setting out its need for police stations and other buildings, but this has been delayed for years, with a “review” ongoing. Police stations are owned by the Greater London Authority, which means the Mayor can keep them open, but has no power to force Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to base his officers there.A POLICE CAR DRIVES PAST A CLOSED AND BOARDED UP POLICE STATION IN HACKNEY IN APRIL 2018GETTY IMAGESThe effects of police station closures on crime have been significant, according to academic Dr Elisa Facchetti, the author of a new analysis published by the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Facchetti found three effects, all of them negative, and argues that the unexpected costs of closing the stations have fallen on other parts of society.One reason, she argues, is that when police stations close, the most serious crimes seem to go up. “The areas where there was a closure of the nearest police station saw an increase in the number of violent crimes — such as assaults and murders,” Facchetti says. She estimates an 11 per cent direct rise in violent crime compared with areas where the police station did not close. Separately, overall knife and gun crime in London went up 20 per cent last year.Secondly, police response times go up, which impacts “clearance rates” — the number of crimes that officers can solve. “Instead of getting there in five minutes, now it takes [the police] 10 minutes,” Facchetti says, time that can be vital for interviewing witnesses. “The consequence is that they’re less good at solving cases.” The third effect is on reporting of offences — with locals less likely to report “petty crimes” such as shoplifting or bike thefts if there is no police station nearby. “People think that ‘the police are not going to be able to do anything’, so they don’t bother reporting it,” Facchetti says.KENNINGTON POLICE STATION, WHICH IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLICDANIEL HAMBURY/STELLA PICTURES LTDCriminals are also more likely to work in places where they can see police stations are abandoned, she believes. “Potential offenders target those areas, especially for property crimes [such as burglary],” Facchetti says.She argues that the police station closures have been a “false economy” in the long term. “They saved money at the beginning, but then the costs related to the closures went higher than the savings,” she says. When crimes are committed, the state has to pay, such as to help victims who need medical attention, or in the justice system. Her study estimates that for each pound “saved” by the closures, they raised costs faced by society by £3.But Facchetti thinks the police force cannot really be blamed. They were told to make cuts, and wanted to implement them without reducing the number of officers. However, it was the wrong choice, she says. “They underestimated the importance of the stations for both their operations as well as for their communities. You can make savings and become more efficient in a different way… by allocating resources better.”For Facchetti, police station closures are one of a number of the “false economies” of austerity. “I think it’s becoming more and more evident, as all the negative consequences of these austerity policies are appearing throughout the domain of public life.”HOLLOWAY POLICE STATION, WHICH IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLICDANIEL HAMBURY/STELLA PICTURES LTDHer report is, of course, only one view of the impact of police station closures but there was more ammunition for those who think the policy went too far in the report on the Met published last year by Baroness Casey.The peer stopped short of calling for the reopening of police stations, and blamed the decline of frontline and neighbourhood policing largely on a misallocation of resources to elite units, poor management, and the frequent “abstraction” of local officers to perform other duties away from the communities they are meant to be serving. But her report highlighted a series of negative consequences of the Met decision to close permanently 124 stations between 2010 and 2022. She said these included “greater distances for response officers and neighbourhood policing teams to travel to and from local bases” and “fewer points of accessible contact for the public.”Her report also warned that the 2018 switch to a system of “basic command units” each covering several boroughs has led to “much weaker connections to long-established communities” and “longer response times” as well as “less knowledge of local crime patterns”.A spokesman for the Mayor said: “The Government has chronically underfunded the Met since 2010, cutting police funding by more than £1 billion. Since 2016, the Mayor has repeatedly tried to plug this huge funding gap, but is doing so with one hand tied behind his back.STREATHAM POLICE STATION, WHICH IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLICDANIEL HAMBURY/STELLA PICTURES LTD“Against this challenging backdrop, the Mayor has substantially reduced the rate of police station closures begun under the previous mayor Boris Johnson, who closed 70 between 2010-2016. He has also maintained his commitment to a 24/7 police front counter in every borough and boosted officer numbers through record investment in policing. With an increased number of police officers and PCSOs now serving in London, the Mayor believes there now is a strong case to retain more police buildings in the capital.”A Met spokesman said: “Every London borough has a police front counter which is open 24 hours a day to the public. In addition, the public are able to contact us via telephone, social media and online at www.met.police.uk”.A Home Office spokesman said: “While the decision to close stations is a matter for individual police forces and the Police and Crime Commissioners, we will always support our police and the Met will receive up to £3.5 billion in 2024-25, an increase of up to £125.8 million on last year.”Additional reporting by Martin Bentham and Ross Lydall

Adrian Irving ● 251d18 Comments ● 248d