Johnson's egregious behaviour, not Sue Gray, was responsible for his downfall. Sue Gray's report on the shenanigans at No10 during lockdown was only part (but a pretty damning part) of the evidence considered by the Privileges Committee. The Committee's report concluded that Johnson was in contempt of Parliament on several scores: that he misled the house by repeatedly stating that COVID guidance was followed at all times in Downing Street; that he similarly misled the Committee; and that he was complicit in a campaign of abuse directed at those investigating him. Johnson resigned after sight of the Committee's draft report. There was no 'kangaroo court', as alleged by Johnson, and no conspiracy between the Labour opposition and Sue Gray, as you seem to be suggesting, without any evidence other than her subsequent hiring.
Robert Fish ● 728d