Forum Topics

Jeremy Vine ends cycling commute posts

I've never been a huge fan of Jeremy Vine's approach to cycling with its emphasis on conflict with other drivers and danger to people on a bike. My personal view is that this can be counterproductive and that the best way to encourage people to cycling is to tell them how safe and stress free it generally is even in an urban London environment. That said we'd both agree that the more people that cycle the better and perhaps my approach is dictated more by me wanting to avoid conflict rather than any proper assessment of how effective it is.The question of the legacy of his posts is a tricky one. The reach of Twitter is probably much exaggerated. I don't visit it much now but when I do his posts often pop up. It is likely that the millions of views recorded are from a relatively small bunch of people on each side of the debate getting very worked up about them. There always seemed to be very low engagement for his posts when there clearly was a case of very bad driving but lots of traction when he was essentially aggressively enforcing his right of way and was annoyed a driver had forced him to slow for a fraction of a second.While the abuse that he got was unacceptable, it is not atypical for that seen on Twitter these days with its almost total lack of moderation. He was actively courting controversy so he must have known what was coming but I think he is right to walk away now.Overall, despite my reservations about his methods, I think he has made life safer for cyclists in London. The claim that he has made people hate people on bikes doesn't stand up. The people who describe themselves as cyclists on their social media profile do a good job of generating hostility on their own and they are a tiny sub-set of those who actually ride a bike on a daily basis. My own experience has been that motorists have become much more considerate of cyclists and aware of the rules of the road with regard to bikes over the last decade. That may in part be due to the rise of the Go Pro and awareness that any encounter might be filmed but Jeremy's posts will have served to reinforce that so I think they have served to make our roads safer for all if not actually saved lives.

Mark Evans ● 109d39 Comments ● 105d

VE Day in Chiswick 1945 and celebrations in 2025?

I recall Street Parties in Chiswick after the Second World War.Tressle tables down the middle of the Road in Wolseley Gardens ...with bunting on display too.Hardly a motor car to be seenalong the kerbs in those daysLot's of children and their familieswere enjoying the meagre goodies available at that time. Remember Food Rationing & the FR books to control what you bought!(There was a limit on sweets too until the early 1950s and how we made up for lost goodies then!)Mrs Sheridan at No 37 was the star organiser and her family are still around today. Many of us benefited from the use of the Air Raid shelter in her back garden ... where we enjoyed bread and sugar sandwiches etc.I believe that we had a Street Party on both VE and VJ day ... and Whitehall Park Road had a Street Party too which I attended.It was at the railway end.Life was tough for our parents ...listening out for the Air Raid Siren... and when we did we hid under the iron Morrison Shelter erected in our Parent's bedroom.In February 1944 a bomb had dropped in Wolseley Gardens ... demolishing some 4 houses and killing 5 adults.(no memorial plaque there ...sadly)Mrs Sheridan and her family were 2 houses away from the Bomb. The doddlebug had 10 second's earlier dropped a bomb on the United DiariesDepot in Sutton Lane ...killing some 9 horses.I recall also being taken to the Victoria Embankment, Westminster to watch the mighty VE day processionwhich included Service Men andWomen from all over ... INCLUDING RUSSIA(!) ...as at that time ... we were on the same side.Parties and bunting continued after the War as Service personnelreturned from their postings abroad ... eg Burma. Sadly many never returned. God bless them.

Jim Lawes ● 113d6 Comments ● 106d

1 Burlington Lane Tower

Site: 1 Burlington Lane,Chiswick,W4 2RRDevelopment: Demolition and redevelopment of the site to provide a part-6, part-10 storey building tocreate 132 self contained flats and terrace of 3-storey properties, comprising of residential development,flexible commercial floorspace with associated car parking, private & communal amenity space,landscaping, refuse, cycle and public realm improvements.The Council received observations from you about the above-proposed development and I am nowwriting to tell you that the application will be decided by the Planning Committee on 01/05/2025.The meeting will be held at the Council Offices, Hounslow House, 7 Bath Road, Hounslow TW3 3EB.The meeting will be viewable to watch on a live stream on the council’s YouTube page from 7.00pm onthe date of the meeting which is the starting time for the meeting.Confirmation of the start time and a link to the meeting will be available on the council’s web page:http://democraticservices.hounslow.gov.uk/mgCommitteeDetails.aspx?ID=595To make sure that the application has been included on the agenda for the meeting, you can log ontowww.hounslow.gov.uk and follow the links from 'Your Council and Elections'( https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/info/20044/councillors_and_democracy ) You will also be able to see theplanning officer’s report to the committee. The full agenda, with reports, is normally available to view aminimum of seven days before the date of the meeting. Any of the public libraries in Hounslow boroughcan provide access to the Hounslow Council website. Alternatively you can contact the CommitteeAdministrator, Bill Lee on 020 8583 2068 or by email at william.lee@hounslow.gov.ukThe meeting will be open to the public.Speakers are only allowed to address the Committee in particular circumstances. If you would still like toattend the meeting to speak, please contact the Committee Administrator, Bill Lee on 020 8583 2068 oremail william.lee@hounslow.gov.uk by 12 noon on the Friday before the Committee date. Further detailson how to attend the meeting will be forwarded to all persons registered.If you wish only to watch the meeting, you are encouraged to use the livestream already mentioned.However, in accordance with legislation, the Council will be making a number of seats available forpublic viewing of this meeting.If you send any further information to the Councillors on the Committee, please also provide the planningofficer with an electronic copy. If you don’t do this then the planning officer may not be able to answerquestions (or offer solutions) when Councillors raise your concerns about the application during itsdiscussion at the meeting. If it is not submitted to planning officers electronically at least a day before themeeting, it will not be able to be displayed. You are advised that no account can be taken of additionalinformation received on the day of committee.Very occasionally an application can be withdrawn from the Committee agenda after its publication. Ifyou are intending to be at the meeting you may wish to contact Bill Lee on 020 8583 2068 on the day ofthe meeting to check that the application is still being heard.Yours faithfullyPlanning Services

Chris Lucy ● 115d15 Comments ● 106d

London Marathon 2025 in aid of Missing People

Hello Chiswick!My name is Ella and I'm a born and bred local running London Marathon 2025 in aid of Missing People. I've had the privilege of working for the charity for 18 months, and in a mission to reach my target, I'm reaching out to my neighbours to ask for their support.Missing People (originally the National Missing Persons Helpline) was created in response the disappearance of estate agent, Suzy Lamplugh, from Fulham in July 1986. Over 30 years since registering as a charity, Missing People's office is still in East Sheen. If you would like to support, please donate here: https://2025tcslondonmarathon.enthuse.com/pf/ella-mccallum - social media shares would also be a huge help, as I understand that financial support is not always possible.What your donations means:£11 could answer a call from someone in a mental health crisis, providing the support and reassurance they desperately need.£25 could send a TextSafe message to 5 missing children, scared and alone and at risk of harm, offering free, confidential support and help to stay safe.£50 could provide specialist counselling to a family living in limbo when a loved one has gone missing.Our vision is for every missing child and adult, and every loved one left behind, to find help, hope and a safe way to reconnect.A person is reported missing every 90 seconds in the UK, that's a staggering 170,000 missing people every year. As the only charity lifeline for anyone affected by a person going missing, we want to ensure we have the best chance to find all of these people. Ella x

Ella McCallum ● 152d7 Comments ● 111d

When is a crime not a crime?

Last week I was walking home with my daughter and we cut through the stretch of Acton Lane that passes by the Stag Pub and Kitchen Network takeaway.All of a sudden 4 men on two motorized scooters, whizzed by us, jumped off and began attacking a white car with clubs. They were smashing the car and attempting to club the driver who was frantically trying to reverse out of Berrymede Road (which he did, knocking over a young tree), eventually driving off. A fifth helmeted delivery driver ran out of the Kitchen Network and joined in with "his friends". Smashing the careening car.My young daughter was distraught, as it was very violent and scary, and in fact I contemplated trying to capture a license plate on my phone but it was so intense I was scared I might be seen and turned on so I walked her back away from the scene (there were others looking out of local shops at what was going on).Afterwards, I reported the incident to the police online, with as much detail as I could.However to my disappointment I got a response the next day saying that the incident was not considered a crime and so would not be recorded.Given the extreme level of violence (my daughter now keeps asking me if she's safe), I am angry that this is dismissed and presumably not recorded in any official figures. While no-one was killed, surely attacking people (presumably thus is a gang in gang fight) should not be tolerated and normalised? What kind of message does this send? Am I wrong?

Tim Mackinnon ● 212d21 Comments ● 191d

Taking a bus in London? It might be quicker to walk

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/transport/article/taking-a-bus-in-london-it-might-be-quicker-to-walk-fjs2sc2txThe mayor has been urged to review cycle lane and low-traffic policies after a watchdog revealed that average bus speeds had fallen as low as 6.6mphBus speeds were as low as an average of 6.6mph in central London. A typical jogging speed is about 6 mphTaking the bus from Abbey Road Studios to Tate Britain, for example, a distance of only four miles, was scheduled to take up to one hour and 15 minutes. In the City of London, the financial capital of Britain, average speeds were even slower at just 6.6 mph.The average person walks at about 3mph and jogs at about 6mph, meaning it would be quicker to walk or run than take the bus for many journeys in London, particularly during the busiest periods.A London bus driver, who wished to remain anonymous, said that the replacement of bus lanes with cycle lanes, the introduction of low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), floating bus stops where cycle lanes pass on the inside, 20mph speed limits and pavement widening had combined to increase congestion and slow journeys to a crawl.“Drivers have had enough,” he said. “Today I was meant to have a one-hour lunch but because of congestion it got taken down to 40 minutes, and it was the same yesterday and the day before. Our breaks are also getting shorter thanks to delays. Yet there are fewer cars on the roads. It’s madness. No wonder we’re seeing more bus collisions. Drivers are crashing due to fatigue. The problem is if you speak out you get sacked. It’s depressing.”Analysis of the watchdog’s data by The Times found that nine of the ten London boroughs with the biggest falls in bus speeds had introduced LTNs since 2020 while only three of the ten with the smallest reductions had done so.Critics have said that LTNs in residential areas simply relocate traffic to main roads, adding to congestion and delaying buses.One of the biggest drops in bus speeds was in Hackney, which now has 70 per cent of its roads covered by LTNs.The bus driver said: “The real problem with LTNs is when there are road works or an accident. Then they can have a massive effect on an area because there is no other way out. If other roads were open then cars could get out and that could help buses move a bit more freely but it doesn’t happen.”London TravelWatch said the replacement of bus lanes with cycling lanes and poorly planned roadworks were also delaying journeys.Sonya Dallat, of the watchdog, said: “While we support measures to encourage active travel in London and help reduce air pollution and car use, we want all transport users to be considered. As buses are the only fully accessible mode of public transport, we are urging Transport for London to maintain and not remove bus lanes when implementing new road schemes, as well as to better enforce existing bus lane restrictions, and increase bus lane operating hours.”About five million bus journeys were taken in Greater London each day in the year 2022-23The Times conducted a four-month battle with Transport for London (TfL) to get it to reveal how many bus lanes it had replaced with cycle lanes but it declined to answer, at first arguing the information would be too expensive to obtain and then changing its position to say it did not hold the data.The bus driver said that replacing bus lanes with cycle lanes was a big issue, especially at certain pinch points. “Outside St Paul’s, for example, you used to get to [the road] New Change quite easily and quickly using the bus lane but now you can lose up to 30 minutes trying to turn left towards the Strand — all because the bus lane has gone. It was not even a long bus lane but it was enough to help us.“Since then we’ve also had all these floating bus stops and they can also delay us because if there’s more than one bus coming in, you have to wait while the other unloads whereas before you could all pull in and serve people at the same time.”Cycling campaigners have said investment in cycle infrastructure works because it encourages more people to get on bikes, which is good for their health and reduces pollution. Data from TfL shows that cycling journeys have increased by 20 per cent since 2019.However, critics have argued that the hundreds of millions of pounds spent encouraging cycling has disproportionately benefited those who are already better off.The data from TfL showed that the majority of cyclists were higher-earning, middle-aged men while bus users tended to have lower incomes and higher proportions of women and ethnic minorities. Buses were also the most popular form of public transport in London in the financial year to 2023 with about five million journeys every day. Cycling accounted for only 4.5 per cent of journeys.Vincent Stops, who worked as a policy officer at London TravelWatch for 20 years and as a councillor in Hackney for 16 years, believed that TfL and councils were putting cyclists ahead of bus users. “It’s quite bizarre,” he said. “TfL has a programme of installing bus priority on the one hand, but at the same time taking out key stretches of bus lane for cycle lanes.”The campaign group Social and Environmental Justice called on Khan, the mayor of London, to take action on the decline in the speed of bus journeys.“Buses are the capital’s most widespread and affordable form of public transport,” the group said in a statement. “We call on Sadiq Khan to investigate urgently why bus speeds have slowed at a time when traffic across most of London is still lower than in 2019. Where traffic management schemes such as LTNs are found to be impeding bus journeys, they should be removed as soon as possible. London and Londoners must keep moving.”The bus driver believed that 20mph speed limits and pavement widening were also causing delays. “The narrowing of roads such as Oxford Street is a nightmare because as soon as there is any accident or collision everything comes to a standstill,” he said. “There is no space to keep the road moving. It’s amateurish.“Twenty mile per hour limits are another pro