Forum Topics

Health in Cities

The Chief Medical Officer, Professor Whitty, published the annual report on health in cities yesterday. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6756e67b43b2de5fee8dae87/cmo-annual-report-2024-health-in-cities.pdfThere is, of course, a section dedicated to Active Travel starting on page 333. It's really very good and many of the points will be familiar to my personal fan club on this forum. It sets out the case for Active Travel's role in creating healthier urban populations - integrating exercise into our daily movements has numerous health benefits. Then it outlines the barriers and how they need to be overcome. It is a short section and I encourage you all to read it. Here are a few excerpts:On car reduction:  "Reducing private vehicle journeys and car dependency†45 by increasing active travel reduces air and noise pollution and levels of carbon emissions in cities. It also reduces traffic congestion, thereby increasing mobility, accessibility and speed of journeys, increasing productivity and economic benefits, and health equity for households without access to a vehicle.""Over-reliance of private cars is an inefficient use of city space. Supporting people to use active or sustainable travel frees up space for more health and wealth generating activities, e.g. space for play, community amenities, socialising and green spaces, all of which improve the quality of life in our cities."On deterrents to active travel:"Fear of cars and poor driving practices such as speeding are a major deterrent to active travel. Whilst the hierarchy of road users in the Highway Code (Figure 4.61) seeks to protect pedestrian and cyclists as the more vulnerable road users, this is not consistently applied in the design of infrastructure, or enforced. Some examples are when cars park in cycle lanes or when motorists assume they have right of way"

Paul Campbell ● 71d27 Comments ● 62d

Am I going mad or are zebra crossings getting more dangerous?

I’m really noticing more close shaves at zebra crossings in the last year or so. I have no data to back this up, except my own anecdotal evidence. Anyone else notice a trend?It’s not just those on the High Road, but these ones feature heavily. I’ll say at the outset that I’m a cyclist, not a driver, or rather, I ride a bike, don’t drive a car. Taking the bike lane first, bikes haven’t stopped for me, more times than is excusable to be honest. I’m not totally innocent on this front - there has been the very odd occasion when I’ve kept going through a zebra crossing, though this is rare. I now really check both sides of the road for pedestrians about to cross. I think you can also tell as well, when someone has a momentary lapse in awareness, versus people who never intended to stop (rarer) or are cycling at a much lower level of awareness in general (more common). There’s just too many occasions of bikes not stopping, in my view, for these to be explained by momentary lapses. I think it’s rather the case that there are more unaware people on bikes, which I’d put down to the increase in bike sharing programmes, in particular e-bikes like Lime. I’d love for ever increasing numbers of bikes, but I really think people need to have their own bikes, which are suited to their height and weight etc. Most people cannot control Lime bikes sufficiently. Bikes aren’t even the most worrying flouters of the rules at zebra crossings, that’s cars (and motorbikes). Obviously this is much more dangerous and also much more inexcusable. If bikes aren’t stopping at crossings as much as they used to because of more unfamiliar cyclists on the road, there’s no excuse for cars not stopping. It’s hardly the case that there are more inexperienced drivers on the road. I simply think it’s that people don’t care anymore in cars. They just cruise on through crossings. Just now I was a quarter of the way across CHR and one car just cruises through - something that no longer surprises me. Then, however as I got to half way across, straddling both lanes the car behind it also fails to stop. Again, these are anecdotes, with no basis in data, but I’d wager heavily that I’m not the only one seeing things getting worse. Also I make it very clear I’m about to cross the road. I never dart out at an angle or approach the road looking down at my phone. I turn 90 degrees to the crossing and look right, left and right again. Pedestrians are king. Then bikes. Then cars. Rant over. Just getting really tired of this.

Edward Kent ● 90d106 Comments ● 65d

Increased Thames seal sightings could be 'new normal' says expert, as warning issued to Londoners

Dog owners have been asked to keep their pets on leashes...A wildlife expert has issued an appeal to Londoners amid a “sharp increase” in seal sightings in the Thames - which she says is likely to become a “new normal” in the capital.Mary Tester, founding director of Thames Seal Watch, said there has been a sudden surge in seal sightings in the capital as more of the mammals appear to be making their way up the river and “exploring areas of London”.She said she is anxious to avoid a repeat of the 2021 incident in which a beloved seal pup that had been named Freddie by locals had to be put down after being mauled by a dog on the shore near Hammersmith Bridge.She has urged Londoners to keep their distance from seals if they them on shore, and to keep their dogs on leads.“We’re currently seeing a sharp increase in seal sightings in London,” Ms Tester, who is also Thames area coordinator for the British Divers Marine Life Rescue (BDMLR), told The Standard.“Seals have long lived in the river with the latest estuary populations from ZSL counting nearly 600 harbour seals and 3,000 greys.“The newer trend is that they seem to be more regularly exploring areas of London.”There have also been several sightings of dolphins in the Thames in recent months, as far west as Hammersmith.“While there is still no proven reason as to why, it may be a testament to the diverse food sources available to them, with little competition,” said Ms Tester.Stretches of the Thames were declared “biologically dead” by the Natural History Museum in the 1950s but the ZSL says it is now home to 125 species of fish.https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/seals-sightings-thames-river-animals-dogs-warning-london-b1195142.html

Les Wilson ● 94d4 Comments ● 92d

How rogue cyclists have made London’s parks unsafe for children and the elderly

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/16/speeding-cyclists-royal-parks-london-injured/​​Dossier reveals hit-and-runs, riders travelling on illegal bikes and pedestrians being struck so hard they are ‘catapulted’ into the airRichmond Park, which cycling clubs use to record lap speeds, was reported as having the highest number of incidents, along with Regent’s Park Credit: PA/AlamyThe full threat posed to pedestrians by dangerous and illegal cycling in the country’s best-known parks can be revealed by The Telegraph for the first time.The Royal Parks, which runs eight London parklands, has released a dossier of collision data showing how the elderly, the partially sighted and children have been knocked down and injured by cyclists.The file, released under freedom of information laws, logs “speeding” and “aggressive” cyclists being involved in hit-and-runs, ignoring zebra crossings, travelling on illegal bikes and hitting pedestrians so hard they are “catapulted” into the air.Richmond Park and Regent’s Park, which cycling clubs use to record lap speeds, were reported as having the highest number of incidents.The document includes how Brian Fitzgerald, a Credit Suisse director, collided with Hilda Griffiths, 81, as she walked her dog in Regent’s Park in 2022, causing “life-changing injuries”.The Muswell Hill Peloton cyclist, riding at 29mph in a 20mph zone, could not be prosecuted because speed limits do not apply to bikes. Mrs Griffiths died two months later from her injuries.The dossier shows another pedestrian suffered two broken ribs after being hit by a cyclist “doing laps” after he failed to “look properly” when crossing a nearby road a few months earlier.Last year, a cyclist reported feeling “unsafe” because peloton cyclists were “riding on his wheel”.However, the file is not exhaustive and does not include Paola Dos Santos, 52, who suffered severe facial injuries when hit by a cyclist on the wrong side of the road.In Richmond Park in February, a cyclist on a fixed-wheel bike struck a pedestrian “at speed” on a “busy” path with a 10mph speed limit. The bike, which had no front brake, is banned in the parks and “not road legal”, the file says.In August, a pedestrian was taken to hospital with “multiple serious injuries to arm, head and hip” by a “speeding cyclist” who then “fled the scene”.The file includes a letter from a runner who said he would no longer visit the park because “it is becoming so dangerous”.He added: “I’ve on four occasions nearly been hit by a speeding bike. It’s all well and good saying pedestrians have priority but it’s clear that many cyclists (not all of course) are not adhering to this rule.”In January, a cyclist was attacked by another cyclist who was “throwing punches and kicking them on the ground”.In the past four years, Richmond Park had numerous reports of cyclists going “at least 30mph”, “full pelt” or “out of control”.In 2020, a partially sighted pedestrian was “knocked to the ground” by a cyclist who had his “head down because of the wind”. A “very fast” cyclist “on the wrong side of the road crashed head-on into another cyclist”.In Hyde Park in September, a pedestrian was “thrown to the ground” suffering face, wrist and knee injuries after being “struck” by a cyclist near the Serpentine. A year earlier, a pedestrian was taken to hospital suffering dizziness after being “hit” by a Lime bike near Speakers’ Corner.In Kensington Gardens this July, a child was found “bleeding a lot” after being “badly hit by a teenager riding an electric Lime bike” near the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Playground Since the summer of 2020, there have been reports of “near misses” near Kensington Palace, where bikes are banned.A Royal Parks volunteer was “knocked down” and left “shaken” because the cyclist “was shouting and being generally aggressive”.In St James’s Park a pedestrian was hit by a cyclist who “failed to stop at a red signal” – police were called. Then, close to the Mall, a cyclist among a group of 30 “collided with a pedestrian” who “sustained a head injury”.In Bushy Park, a cyclist repeatedly rode their bike into a herd of deer, “causing them to stampede” and scaring other visitors.Gerard Griffiths, the son of Hilda Griffiths, said the dossier illustrated the “alarming attitude of some cyclists”, adding how he fears many more incidents go unreported.He welcomed the Royal Parks’ request to ministers to try to find a legal route to make the parks’ 20mph speed limits apply to cyclists.A source at the Department for Culture Media and Sport, which has Government responsibility for the parks, said: “We have received a proposal to improve safety for park users from the Royal Parks and are considering it.”A Royal Parks spokesman said although cycling has a “deep-rooted history” in the city’s parklands, “the speeds that can now be achieved when cycling in such populated spaces bring new challenges that we are committed to addressing”.She added that the charity had reviewed its policies following “several cycling-related incidents linked to a minority of people cycling at excessive speeds” and had “implemented physical changes in the parks, including larger or wider pedestrian paths, additional crossing points to improve pedestrian safety and additional signage”.She continued: “The parks are shared spaces where pedestrians, cyclists and wildlife coexist, and we have a responsibility to all park users to ensure we are acting in a way that protects and promotes their safety. We continue to work closely with cycling groups, community groups and the Met Police to do all we can to ensure the parks can be enjoyed safely by everyone, now and in the future.”

Michael Good ● 98d6 Comments ● 97d