Forum Topics

Chiswick Sea Cadets:  Instructors Wanted - No experience necessary

Do you have enthusiasm and a passion for working with young people from a variety of backgrounds?Would you like the opportunity to apply this passion in a meaningful role to launch young people for life, whilst also enhancing your skills, boosting your self-esteem and meeting new people?Chiswick Sea Cadets, based at Chiswick Pier, is currently looking for enthusiastic volunteers to join their team as Sea Cadet Instructors. Chiswick is a long-established Sea Cadet Unit that has provided life-changing opportunities for many young people. We currently have 30 cadets who come from all over the area.There are free training courses available for you to develop new skills, boost your CV and support you in this role. These tasks can also be divided between volunteers, so why not come along with a friend and share the experience?There are no specific educational or experience requirements for this role; having the right attitude and a passion for improving the lives of young people are the most important things! If you think the person specification below sounds like you, then please get in touch:• You are reliable, honest and trustworthy• You are enthusiastic and keen to learn new things• You are a good communicator• You enjoy working as part of a team• You will be a role model to young peopleIf you think this volunteer role is for you then please do click apply and find out how you can start making a difference, or contact the unit directly for more details.Apply: https://www.sea-cadets.org/volunteerEmail: Info.chiswick@lwdscc.org

Rebecca Skeete ● 68d2 Comments ● 61d

Cyclists on Pavements - The Police's Policy of doing nothing

By way of the offices of local MP Andy Slaughter the police have set out their approach to adult cyclists and electric bikes on pavements:  From: Met PoliceSent: 11 February 2026 19:24To: SLAUGHTER, andy.slaughter.mp@parliament.ukSubject: RE: Fwd: Adult Cyclists on Pavements (Case Ref: AS141992) Dear Mr Slaughter,Thank you for your message and for raising your constituent’s concerns regarding cyclists and e‑bike riders using pavements and pedestrian areas in Hammersmith and Fulham. We fully recognise that dangerous cycling, the misuse of e‑bikes, and anti‑social riding can pose risks to pedestrians. These concerns are frequently raised with us at community meetings, and they remain a priority for our neighbourhood policing teams.While officers do have enforcement powers in relation to cycling on pavements and the misuse of e‑bikes, safe and proportionate intervention can at times be challenging. Stopping cyclists—particularly those travelling at speed—must always be assessed carefully to avoid creating further risk to the rider, pedestrians, or officers. On occasions where it is unsafe to intervene, immediate enforcement is not possible. However, where officers can safely engage, they issue advice, warnings, and take proportionate enforcement action.Our neighbourhood officers undertake regular proactive activity to address dangerous cycling and the misuse of e‑bikes across the borough.This includes:Engagement and education with cyclists and e‑bike usersChecks on roadworthiness and compliance with relevant legislationEnforcement where appropriate, including the seizure of illegally modified or high‑powered e‑bikesPartnership work with the Local Authority’s enforcement teams Teams also conduct dedicated operations targeted at locations where concerns have most frequently been raised by local residents and partners. These operations are carried out routinely throughout the year, and neighbourhood teams continue to focus on locations where pedestrians are most affected. As with all local policing teams, officers balance a wide range of competing demands, but they remain committed to responding to community concerns and to directing activity where it can have the greatest impact. I hope this information is helpful, If further detail or a follow‑up discussion would be useful, we would be happy to assist. Kind regards [Embedded Image]Zach AliPolice ConstableStaff OfficerCentral West (AW) BCUAddress: Charing Cross Police Station, Agar Street, London WC2N 4JP [Embedded Image][Embedded Image]

Tim Walsh ● 72d67 Comments ● 66d

Digital post boxe notices sprouting like mushrooms

The decades-old red post boxes in Edensor Rd and Devonshire Rd have both been wrapped in black plastic and closed. They both have a notice on them saying that (I think) a digital post box will replace them. No idea what that is so I consulted AI: AI Overview:Digital post boxes refer to two main innovations: modern, solar-powered physical boxes with large slots for parcels, activated by a barcode scan via an app for tracking; and virtual mailbox platforms where users get a real address to receive, scan, and manage mail online (store, forward, shred) remotely. Both aim to modernize postal services, handling the rise in parcel traffic and enabling digital management of important documents like bills and statements securely. Physical Digital Post Boxes (e.g., Royal Mail):    How they work: Traditional red post boxes are upgraded with solar panels, a large slot for parcels (up to shoebox size), and a scanner.    Usage: Customers pay for postage online, print a label with a barcode, and scan it at the box; a drawer opens for the parcel.    Benefits: Allows 24/7 posting of parcels, provides proof of postage via the app, and reduces reliance on physical collection points. Virtual Digital Mailboxes (e.g., UKPostbox, e-Books):    How they work: You get a real street address; mail arrives there, gets scanned, and appears in a secure online portal.    Features: View mail, request forwarding to another location, shred, or store items digitally.    Benefits: Ideal for managing mail remotely, offering security and convenience for important documents like banking or government notices, acting as a secure digital alternative to email. Key TakeawayThe term "digital post box" bridges the physical and virtual worlds, enabling easier parcel posting with new tech and providing secure digital access to mail, reflecting shifts in communication and e-commerce.

Robin Knight ● 126d30 Comments ● 123d

Attacks on Chiswick women in the mid-nineties

Reading about the death of Carl Royal, for whom no tears will be said, dredged up some unpleasant memories. I remember when I first hear about the attacks I was uncertain if they were true. There was no internet in those days - well not for me anyway - and stories often circulated about terrible crimes. I don't recall much TV coverage and if you didn't buy the newspaper on the right day, you wouldn't get to hear about it. It wasn't until the trial that what actually happened was confirmed for most people.I was a daily commuter from Turnham Green at that time so started doing calculations of what were the chances of the victim having been me rather than someone else and the conclusion was terrifying. I never liked walking out of the station to home after dark but I started either calling my husband to collect me or using a cab from the rank if he was not around.As the memory of the crime faded, such precautions started to seem unnecessary and about a decade ago I stopped calling for a lift or getting a cab. Lone women, who had virtually disappeared from Chiswick streets after dark were returning and men's attitudes had changed, for instance crossing the road so they wouldn't be walking behind you. Last night I walked home alone late in the evening without a second thought. Crimes against women are far from a thing of the past and there is no room for complacency but Chiswick, London and the rest of the country are much safer now than they were thirty years ago. Some people seem determined to present London as a crime-ridden hell hole but the reality is that we, men as well as women, are probably safer now than we were at any point in our history.

Anita Blake ● 131d21 Comments ● 128d

Katherine Dunne fails (again)

I was bemused by the puff piece on Katherine done by Chiswick Calendar. Bit surprised they didn't ask her favorite color and if she believed in unicorns. Did we need glamor shots?? Also chuckled at the coverage of the recent area forum with feedback from Katherine's colleague, Alexandra Crush.  So many issues: "Element of competition" In order for there to be competition the competitors must provide the same service. They do not. Per the article, Voi services Ealing. That's it. Forest doesn't. This necessitates needing two different suppliers that can charge whatever they like because their competitor cannot provide the same service. The concept of checks and balances does not exist. Simple economics. "truncated journeys weren't a key issue" Surely Katherine should have choked on these words. "50% less Voi than promised" and "Forest immediately increases fees after getting contract" Is it me, or have the suppliers failed to comply with the terms of the contract? If so, what's the escape clause? If a painter fails to provide the works promised in a contract, the owner would have a court case in their favor. The contract becomes null and void. "no incentive for Lime to comply" False. Wandsworth dealt with this issue by rounding up non-compliant bikes and held them ransom. When I asked Katherine about this her response was "there is no regulation." Apparently she can't do what others clearly can. "commercially sensitive information" With spending public money, how is the public not made aware of any expenditure value? There is talk about competition on an open market yet oddly the market is secret. "I wasn't there but I'm sure it was raised" Why wasn't she there and simply how could she not know??? This begs the question can a petition be started for her removal? She fails repeatedly and there is no reason anyone should endure another two years of this dreadful and unnecessary policy she has put in place. She is clearly out of her league. As for any e-bike/scooter being left where it doesn't belong, what is the line item value for Hounslow Highways to remove them? Has it exceeded it's allowance? My bet is any increase in fees Katherine dreamt of by awarding Voi and Forest is erased (and then some) by the increase in costs for HH to remove illegal vehicles now dumped by three different vendors. Not to mention, the public can't use any Lime bike found in Hounslow. So those cost of removing them is wholly borne by Hounslow. To wit on Glebe Street this AM:


David Lesniak ● 199d109 Comments ● 137d