Forum Topics

Community Protection Warnings and Notices

Hello everyone, We hope it is ok to launch our new campaign here regarding the use of Community Protection Warnings and Notices (CPW’s & CPN’s)📢 New Campaign: Reform Community Protection Warnings & Notices (CPWs & CPNs)Demand Oversight. Demand Fairness. Demand the Right to a Defence.We are launching a national campaign calling on the UK Government to urgently reform the Community Protection regime under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.Under current legislation, Community Protection Warnings (CPWs) and Community Protection Notices (CPNs) can be issued solely on the subjective judgment of a single officer—without any requirement for evidence to be tested, and without giving the accused person any opportunity to defend themselves.This lack of due process breaches the fundamental principles of natural justice and enables serious misuse.⚠️ What’s Going Wrong Now • Authorities are not legally required to hear the “other side” before issuing a CPW or CPN. • Notices are often served in complex neighbour disputes, where victims of harassment or antisocial behaviour are wrongly treated as perpetrators. • CPWs/CPNs can lead to the withdrawal of safeguarding support, leaving vulnerable people isolated, unheard, and unprotected. • There is no statutory right to appeal a CPW, allowing it to escalate unchecked into a legally enforceable CPN.These powers were meant to tackle genuine antisocial behaviour—not to be used as a shortcut that bypasses fair investigation.⸻📌 Join Our CampaignWe have launched a dedicated campaign page, group, and two petitions calling for urgent reform:Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/share/1GZdjtUwLN/Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/share/g/18gMSVbUGy/UK Government Petition: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/767031/sponsors/new?token=oi3oGqqkEoUvJnpsqopVChange.org Petition: https://www.change.org/p/review-the-anti-social-behaviour-crime-and-policing-act-2014⸻📣 We Are Calling For Five Key Reforms1. A Mandatory Right of ReplyIndividuals must be shown the evidence and allowed to respond before any CPW or CPN is issued.2. A Statutory Right to Appeal CPWsWarnings should not escalate unchecked into criminal consequences without independent review.3. Judicial Oversight for CPNsNo CPN should become active without scrutiny by a court or truly independent body.4. Mandatory Evidence StandardsOfficers should be required to verify allegations using independent sources (e.g., CCTV, neutral witnesses), not untested hearsay.5. Safeguarding ProtectionsAdministrative notices must never trigger the automatic withdrawal of support from vulnerable people.⸻✔️ Why It MattersFairness, transparency, and accountability are not optional—they’re essential.No one should face sanctions, stigma, or loss of services without a basic right to defend themselves.The current system allows power without oversight. Together, we can change that.✊ Join us. Share this campaign. Sign the petitions. Demand fair and lawful reform.

James and Steve Jennings ● 24d0 Comments ● 24d

Katherine Dunne's ridiculously expensive e-bike policy

We all know Katherine Dunne misrepresented the truth. Some call it lying but that word tends to offend. So let's keep it user friendly.There is no choice for e-bikes in Hounslow. You go in one direction, you must use only the one service. Period.Now Katherine Dunne's policy is costing users ridiculous sums of money.As of the next billing period (depending on when you're monthly debit is) Lime has REDUCED it's fee from £8.99 to £6.99 for UNLIMITED rides shorter than 20 minutes. My personal routine is an 8 minute ride to work and then another 8 minute ride to the gym. My weekly total is 176 minutes or thereabouts for normal routine and traffic.Were I able to use Lime for all those rides, my monthly cost would be £6.99.The equivalent cost using just Forest would be £18.99. That gets you 250 minutes. If you use more than that, the cost increases to £36.99 for 500 minutes or £70 for 1200 minutes. Of course that also means you must rely on Forest being dependable which it is not.With Lime 1200 minutes could cost you £6.99.With Forest 1200 minutes will cost you £70.Quick simple, easy math (pay attention here, Katherine) means to use Forest it will cost you £63 more per month or £756 more per year.I'm not allowed to say I think Katherine Dunne is a failure. It hurts her feelings and she is a sensitive councillor. But c'mon folks, she's costing cyclists £756 more than should be paid for the same exact service. There is nothing preventing her from allowing Lime to return to Hounslow. Others have unearthed and published this fact.Why are Hounslow residents being gouged to use e-bikes?

David Lesniak ● 67d25 Comments ● 56d