Forum Topics

Hammersmith Bridge’s ‘autonomous pods’

I had seen a lot of coverage, most of it very favourable, of the ‘autonomous pods’ which were being proposed as means of plugging the gap in public transport provision particularly for people with mobility issues. This did seem a quite visionary option to solve the problem particularly as it got round the staffing and cost issues of earlier suggestions for solutions that would require a driver. I did take a chance to look at one when it was on display at a fair recently and was struck with how it was less of a pod than a small bus. Even without passengers it would weigh a lot more than a very large car. As I understand it, while the proponents of the idea say it is within the weight limits, the council say that it isn’t.I then read the coverage of the issue by London Centric, which is doing some of the best journalism on London at the moment. It took the trouble to send someone to ride on the vehicle and they gave a mixed review of the experience. More importantly they made two key points which hadn’t really been highlighted before. Firstly this is essentially a driverless bus not a pod and TfL is not supportive of the idea. Secondly, the unions would be fiercely against autonomous buses.The idea may be a dead end but it does raise important questions. If you are saying driverless buses should be allowed on the bridge, why not driverless cars? Waygo are testing taxis on our roads as we speak. It would be far less technically challenging to allow one or two of these to cross at a time with usage restricted to blue badge holders or Barnes residents with appointments at Charing Cross hospital. As many people in genuine need would be enabled to cross the bridge with this proposals and it wouldn’t cost the taxpayer a penny.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 92d57 Comments ● 23h

Stop Thames Water's "Sewage for Water" Plans

With Thames Water again in the news, I'm hoping the people of Chiswick will lend their support to a campaign to stop the company's plan to dump treated sewage in the last stretch of the non-tidal Thames.The so-called Teddington Direct River Abstraction project in Richmond and Kingston would see the company extract up to 75 million litres a water a day from the Thames in times of drought and replace it with treated sewage.  This will raise pollution levels upstream of Teddington Weir, a part of the river which has recently been designated London's first official bathing water place.  It will involve four to six years of massive disruption to residents while new plant is built at the Mogden sewage works and a 3.5 metre diameter pipeline is bored along a 4-kilometre route from there to the sewage outlet in Ham.The proposals have been taken out of the hands of the local authorities and will now go to the national Planning Inspectorate next year.  In the mean time, the Save Our Lands And River action group has launched a parliamentary petition calling for U.K. sewage treatment to be raised to the standards being adopted in Europe.  This would make the proposals illegal as the effluent returned to the river would not meet the higher standards.We have garnered just short of 50,000 signatures, but need many, many more.  Please help us by signing the petition: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/763721

Magnus Grimond ● 1d0 Comments ● 1d