Forum Topics

TRAFFIC ON ACTON LANE

A letter I have just sent to Deirdre Costigan regarding the appalling traffic we've been experiencing in Acton lane for a great deal of time. I have written to her many times on this issue as she spearheaded the closure of Fishers Lane:Re the traffic - I’m not actually angry about it at all. I am instead just astonished and dismayed by how our counsellors demonstrate at high volume (via their total radio silence) how little they actually care. Well, why would Deirdre care, like we’ve said before, she doesn’t live here, she never sees and feels the affects of her botch jobs.No reply. No comments. No attempt to appease. No attempt to empathise. No attempt to ease the situation when in fact they do have the ability and means to do it. Zero exchange.What else can we conclude that you don’t give a stuff Deirdre. And I say this as I write at 1435 on a Saturday afternoon (and since I got up this morning) the traffic has been sitting and inching along …. all day so far, like every other day.Do you know why many people have given up on Chiswick Deirdre? Well not those who seem happy to sit in these silly queues to plough through our area, but the people who used to see Chiswick as a destination. I have many friends who moved further afield because property prices became so high here. They still love Chiswick, they came back regularly but since you people have got your hands on it they literally refuse to come back. They can’t even get here on a bus because your measures have so badly impacted us. I went to visit one such friend yesterday who lives in Isleworth. A distance of 3.5 miles and it took me 1 hour and 25 minutes to get there on the bus. 1 hour and 25 minutes - now I understand why my friend has said she won’t come here any more.What is your intention exactly? It seems to me you want to cripple the capital rather than make it a more user friend place. And you say nothing to the contrary. You only seem to be loud and vocal when you’re welding your axe and trying to get more roads closed.

Anthony Letterese ● 1450d158 Comments ● 1439d

can we trust the statistics in the media (lecture)

can we trust the statistics in the media (lecture)Join Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE, online or in person, for the 2022 Peter Lindsay Lecture.We have limited in-person spaces available so please ensure you register in advance.Abstract The current pandemic has emphasised the key role that statistics play in understanding what is going on in the world.  But how do we decide whether to trust the numbers that get put in front of us?  Are they being used to inform or persuade us? Using a wide range of examples, I will look at the way that statistics can be used to try and persuade audiences to think or act in a certain way, contrast this with efforts to make communication ‘trustworthy’, and list the questions that you should ask whenever you are presented with claims based on numbers. BiographyProfessor Sir David Spiegelhalter FRS OBE is Chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication in the Centre for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. The Centre aims to improve the way that statistical evidence is used by health professionals, patients, lawyers and judges, media and policy-makers.  He has been very busy over the COVID crisis.  He presented the BBC4 documentaries “Tails you Win: the Science of Chance”, the award-winning “Climate Change by Numbers”, and in 2011 came 7th in an episode of BBC1’s Winter Wipeout.  His bestselling book, The Art of Statistics, was published in March 2019, and Covid by Numbers came out in September 2021.   He was knighted in 2014 for services to medical statistics, was President of the Royal Statistical Society (2017-2018), and became a Non-Executive Director of the UK Statistics Authority in 2020.   He is @d_spiegel on Twitter, and his home page is http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~david/Imperial College LondonWednesday, 26 October 2022    • Time: 17.30 - 18.30     • Location: Lecture Theatre 200, City and Guilds Building     • Campus: South Kensington Campus       Open to all    • Contact: Wieslawa Hsissen

Bernard Allen ● 1441d6 Comments ● 1439d

Cycling Stats

With the other thread 150 posts long, I thought I would start another one. “I'm suggesting if you want to claim that the increase in cycling at this point is simply down to more couriers in the evening, you should look at all the evening data, not just the last three years. With low numbers of counts there is plenty of sample error, so if you pick 2019 you can claim there's been a doubling of evening cycling and put that down to couriers. But for the previous four years evening counts were very comparable to 2021 - in fact 2017 had the highest evening count. While I've little doubt there's been an increase in couriers, it's simply not the case that the last two years can be explained as down to an increase in couriers. In fact reducing the sample error by taking the average of all the years before compared to the two years after the closure show there has been an increase in cycling throughout all four standard periods of the day, largest in the pm peak, then the inter peak, evening and am peak. You're only getting largely varying differences because you're slicing the data so thinly the sample error dominates.” I only chose 2019 and 2021 as they were the years you chose to highlight the increase on the High Road, so you can use just two years of data if it shows what you want, but the full data set has to be used if it doesn’t. Most people would consider that to be cherry picking your data.  There have been increases in the 2021 data above the five year average (2015-19), however they are not evenly spread through the day. Between 7pm – 10pm the increase accounts for 8.6% of the daily increase. 6am to 10am is 13.9%, 10am to 4pm is 22.2% and 4pm to 7pm accounts for 55.3% of the daily increase. If you expand the time slot to 3.30pm to 7pm it accounts for 77% of the daily increase. Using all the data and a five year average it becomes even more obvious all of the increases in cycling are between 3.30 and 7pm. From 6am – 10am the five year average is 125.2, 143 were recorded in 2021, an increase of 18, the highest number recorded was 142 in 2018. From 8am to 9am the number recorded was well below the five year average. 54 recorded in 2021 and the five year average is 63.4. 10am – 3.30pm the five year average is 102.4, 103 were recorded in 2021, so for 5 and a half hours a day there is no change. From 7pm – 10pm the five year average is 49, 60 were recorded in 2021, an increase of 11, the highest number recorded was 61 in 2017. Then we have 3.30 - 7pm that has a 5 year average of 129.4 and a previous highest of 172, jumping up to 228. That is almost 100 above the five year average. The increase is unlikely to be commuters as they are not cycling to work in the morning, the same with school children. I think it is too late for leisure cyclist and too early for people coming home and going out to exercise. So who else might be cycling between 3.30 and 7pm that has caused the numbers to jump so significantly? It will be interesting to see the 2022 figures to see if the trends continue or if the increases (or decreases) become more balanced.

Colin Potter ● 1442d16 Comments ● 1440d