Forum Topics

Traffic Chaos in Chiswick

The conditions on the roads around and along Chiswick High Road over the past week have been unacceptable. Granted the road works on the A4 have contributed but there are fundamental problems of capacity caused by the cycle lane and by network movement restrictions such as placed on Fishers Lane. What is even more unacceptable is the attitude of both LB Hounslow and LB Ealing to the situation and the social and environmental damage being perpetuated, plus a total lack of ameliorative action.  Local residents have written to both Councillor Dunne and Councillor Costigan, respectively, to seek their help to address the problems by at least lifting the restrictions on Fishers Lane. but neither has had the courtesy to reply in person.  In Councillor Dunne’s case she left it to a young, graduate officer in the traffic department to issue a reply that simply apologised for the "inconvenience" caused and spouted the active travel mantra and made ill-informed comments about re-introducing traffic to Fishers Lane being unsafe. What was completely ignored was the fact that very large numbers of local people are being adversely impacted, especially those living north of Chiswick High Road, while the councils claim they must keep the restrictions in place to encourage cyclists.   Have you seen how few cyclists actually use Fishers Lane?  Also, I cycled through the route many times prior to the restrictions and it was perfectly safe to do so.These councillors have a duty to listen to, and represent, residents and businesses in all wards, and not just their own. But they are silent. Do they really care about what is happening in Chiswick? Apparently not.  They appear to be trapped by the ideology promoted by Boris Johnson’s cycling adviser Andrew Gilligan and perpetuated by Grant Schapps, who made easy money available for councils across London.  Thankfully both have now gone and some common sense should return soon.  Will common sense and a sense of public duty towards the residents and businesses of Chiswick return the lead councillors and officers of both councils?

David Kerr ● 1472d104 Comments ● 1468d

The Council clearly knows the level of fines on Staveley Rd. But why won’t they say?

Good to have been away for a month, and offline, missing all the nonsense of a Tory party navel gazing in selecting a new leader, the frightening uplift in energy caps and future forecasts, potentially 8 grand a year on average.   How will we afford that!On more local issues it is sad to see all the posts over August on the impact of the closure of parts of the A4 on traffic in Chiswick and West London.  Sadly, like the economy worse is likely to come all the way up to Christmas.  One question that remains unanswered, but the answer is clearly known by the Council, is what are the levels of fines on Staveley Rd, and in conjunction with Hartington and Thames Rd, what do they add up to?As reported in the Chiswick Calendar at the start of August, quoting the Council it says: “The number of penalty charge notices being issued for contravention of either the Hartington Rd or Staveley Rd access restrictions is far higher than would be expected given the length of time the restrictions have now been in place.”The article goes on to suggest the existing signage is adequate.  But how can that be the case if the level of fines is above expectations.    So why are the Council not telling Chiswick residents what the level of fines are?  And does anyone know the number?  Is it an alarming number of 50 a day, which would equate to about £ 1 million fines issued since the start of the year.  Is it even higher and the Council simply don’t want us to know.  What it suggests is that the whole scheme like others in Chiswick has been poorly implemented as the majority of residents in Chiswick have said consistently.With the chaos being caused by the A4 bridge work, it has been good to see that Grove Park has been opened up somewhat, and we, Chiswick people, can once again get into see friends who live there, and down to the River when not able to walk, as we all once were able to do.  This temporary reprieve should be made permanent.Maybe this policy can go with Boris Johnson. 

Jonathan Mabbutt ● 1480d15 Comments ● 1469d