Forum Topics

Are Hounslow Cycling misrepresenting members numbers to Scrutiny Committee?

Has Hounslow Cycling a membership of 10,000 or is that the London Cycling Campaign, for the whole of London, across 33 boroughs and 9m people?  Looks like it must be the London Cycling Campaign from their website.  It would be helpful to know as it is clear from a recent submission from Hounslow Cycling to the Council that they are clearly trying to infer that it is 10,000 in Hounslow rather than the whole of London. This question has arisen from simply having watched Social Media feeds last night and this morning - that alerts the reader that it is quite clear that something is going amiss with the inclusion of papers for the Overview and Scrutiny Committee set for Monday.  So I decided to go to the Council website and track down the documents to see what all the fuss was about.You can do this too at:https://democraticservices.hounslow.gov.uk/documents/g12025/Public reports pack Monday 30-Nov-2020 18.00 Overview and Scrutiny Committee.pdf?T=10If you get to page 65 onwards to page 81 you can see submissions from external parties.  From what is being said on social media 16 pages simply does not represent the number of submissions that sought to provide evidence on the 5 key points for or against the reason for the 2 call ins: Inadequate consultation with stakeholders prior to the decision;Inadequate evidence on which to base a decision;The action is not proportionate to the desired outcome;A potential human rights or equalities challenge;Insufficient consideration of legal and financial advice.Appears that those saying there is clear evidence to back the call ins are most disgruntled. It is also interesting to observe that 2 identical submissions from Hounslow Cycling are simply partially copied. Was that a form letter sent in or a copying error made by the officers.  One of those says "Hounslow Cycling is the borough group of London Cycling Campaign, a membership charity with 10,000 members".So the question is as a member of the Scrutiny Committee do I read that as it is Hounslow Cycling that has 10,000 members or do I know that it the total membership of London Cycling Campaign, across 33 boroughs and 9m people?   About 0.11% of the population.  So what is the answer? 

Chris Soze ● 2160d11 Comments ● 2159d

Revolt!

Brentford TV4hEIGHT LABOUR COUNCILLORS BREAK RANK AND ATTACK COUNCIL'S NEW TRAFFIC SCHEMES, LARGELY AGREEING WITH TORY OPPOSITION.  They are forcing the controversial strategy – driven forward by the Labour Cabinet – to be "called in" for consideration by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee. They accuse Cllr Hanif Khan, Transport, leader Steve Curran and others of:1. Inadequate consultation with stakeholders prior to the decisionWard councillors have not been engaged or consulted, particularly on phase 3 (the next stage), which Cabinet has approved, in principle, with this decision.Decisions about Streetspace appear to be made by Cabinet Members and Chief Officers without reference to ward councillors who are the democratically elected representatives of local residents.Other stakeholders, including local businesses and transport providers, also do not seem to have been adequately consulted.2. Inadequate evidence on which to base a decisionThe programme contains schemes based on suggestions gathered from the public from April to June 2020, combined with the aspirations of Cabinet Members and Chief Officers. There is no evidence of traffic modelling or other objective evidence to assess the impact, or feasibility of individual schemes.3. A potential human rights or equalities challengeThe public sector equality duty (PSED) applies when making any changes to road networksIn this instance, many individual schemes are likely to disadvantage residents who cannot easily walk or cycle, particularly older residents, disabled residents and residents with young childrenAlthough para 11.0 says an “initial assessment of potential equalities impacts has been developed”, it has not been published, and the report does not say whether, or not, unmitigated disadvantage to protected groups has been identified.The call-in is now listed for the next meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, for Monday 30 November, starting at 6pm. It can be watched online. There is also a request for a call-in from Cllr John Todd, Conservative. The agenda says: "Initial Response to Call-in – Lead Members Cllrs Hanif Khan, Katherine Dunne and Guy Lambert."This will be followed by "Members Questions, then Members Discussion and Decision".The rebel councillors are led by Cllr Richard Eason, Isleworth, and are Cllrs Gurmail Lal, Afzaal Kiani, Puneet Grewal, Amrit Mann, Javed Akhunzada, Surinder Purewal and Mohammed Umair. It is unusual for councillors to call in an issue involving their own party. Normally it is resolved internally. But this move has brought the traffic controversy out into the open and exposes dissent in the Labour ranks. More than that, the Labour councillors are agreeing with the criticisms made by the Tory opposition. The fact that it could not be settled internally indicates a deep disagreement which could undermine confidence in Cllr Khan's strategy – and therefore his position – and prompt people to ask why council leader Steve Curran could not sort this out behind the scenes, as he usually would. If the plans are reversed in a significant way, and against his wishes, then Cllr Khan might have to go. The ripple effect would reach out to his schemes' most ardent supporters – Cllrs Curran, Dunne and Lambert – and the Tories would no doubt exploit it to the full. For the Labour administration, it is a fulcrum moment.Brentford Today & TV/Facebook.Image may contain: 9 people, text that says ""Inadequate consultation. May disadvantage older, disabled and those with children." LABOUR SPLIT OVER NEW TRAFFIC SCHEMES Eight Labour rebels attack Cllr Khan's decisions Richard Eason Gurmail Lal Afzaal Kiani Puneet Grewal Amrit Mann Javed Akhunzada Surinder Purewal Mohammed Umair Could Hanif Khan go? Call-in: Decision on cEX 496 Streetspace Programme Overview and Scrutiny November 2020 6:00"

Vanessa Smith ● 2167d29 Comments ● 2161d