Forum Topics

What a terrible scheme - There has been no consultation

Until recent weeks I had no idea at all about this scheme. How can that be when I live here?  I now discover that it has been going on in a secretive way for a couple of years or more, with people - our neighbours in some parts of Grove Park - quietly promoting their own self-interests with Hounslow.  It is very sad that such a thing could happen.There has been no consultation with many people in Grove Park about the proposed scheme, and that is an outrage! There are many issues here.  For all of us that live in the Grove Park area it is our home, and we need to move easily around our home area without restriction.  Then with traffic, I completely understand why nobody wants their roads used as rat runs.  But if everything is shunted only onto Sutton Court Road, that will produce enormous problems.  Sutton Court Road is already hugely congested (pre-Covid-19) at different times of day.  The proposed plan would make it incredibly diffiult for people to get in and out of the area at key times of day - and that includes people who live here, people who work here, people making deliveries etc etc  We all need to look carefully at what can sensibly be done that can help to improve the rat run situation etc.  But not in a way that leaves the place in which we live impossibly congested on key thoroughfares, and like some kind of horrible restricted police state.By the way, regarding traffic, the closure of Hammersmith Bridge has affected Chiswick badly, and is something we should all be campaigning about far more vociferously.And the Chiswick Piazza.  That will damage accessibility and trade for the wonderful shops that we all value so much.  I personally would never have voted for spending a single penny on the ghastly project.  I do hope that people who live in Grove Park will wake up and do their very best to resist these awful schemes. Thanks

Rae Lewis ● 2316d38 Comments ● 2314d

Time for Local Traders and Shops to Organise?

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that shops in Chiswick are consistently getting dumped on from a great height and nobody really takes their views seriously.I recently completed a freelance project for a statutory industry body and became aware of how they play a role in policy formation. These bodies are important because people in government don't like to deal directly with individual companies because of the risk of favouritism but are comfortable with organisations representing a range of companies. What applies at the national level must presumably also apply at a local level.When the council do anything on the High Road the traders always say they weren't consulted but the council say they were. Any doubt would be removed if there was an organisation representing their interests and it would be far harder for the council to claim any measure had support.Lots of other high streets in London are either part of a Business Improvement District or have an active Chamber of Commerce. It can't be a coincidence that many of them seem to be thriving while Chiswick is in decline.I asked my friend who runs a shop in the area and she said the problem may be apathy or a view that there were 'big personalities' that would dominate any association but she admitted the absence of one is a problem. I'm not putting myself forward to set one up but it does seem to me the time is overdue for local traders to act on this.

Felicity Caborn ● 2323d30 Comments ● 2315d

Closures of Devonshire Rd and Turnham Green Terrace confirmed plus a 'bonus'

Finally some details of what is actually happening have been released and we don't have to rely on people who claim to be in the know to tell us.My view remains that these closures will displace traffic to junctions where they will cause greater problems than the benefits they deliver. However, it is pointless getting into that discussion as we will find out whether this is the case soon enough.More generally the following is my take on the proposals.1) Widening access to loading bays is a good idea and should mollify businesses worried about lost trade to a degree. Why not extend this to every loading bay in the borough?2) Given that there is nearly always a van from Mackens parked on TGT how will that impact their business?3) The lack of detail about CCTV enforcement is worrying. It can be assumed that the council will want to make up on the lost revenue from parking bays. Will you be able to drive in on spec to TGT and Devonshire Road and load or unload without risk of a fine? What then would stop a resident of the Glebe Estate stopping to pick up a coffee in Tamp and then driving to the end of Devonshire Road to get home by the most direct route? Will businesses be consulted about how CCTV enforcement is done. They clearly believe the revenue from enforcement will be greater than what they currently get from parking and enough to justify the initial capital costs if they are prepared to take the risk of pressing ahead without government funding guaranteed4) There doesn't seem to be any reason for a hold up of a Fishers Lane closure if that's what both councils want to do. Would it be a huge surprise if the dispute was over camera enforcement revenue? This spot is likely to be a goldmine given that lots of motorists will use the underpass by mistake or believing they will get away with it. 5) Duke Road - thought it had already been decided this was a bad idea? Can't see a single benefit it offers. Looks like are trying to sneak it in as an extra with a bonus enforcement camera at the spot to bring in extra revenue.

Paul Corcoran ● 2328d177 Comments ● 2315d