Forum Topics

Is extending the Congestion Charge such a bad thing?

I don't know many people who live inside the current congestion charge zone but those that do seem to think it is a great thing.From a purely selfish perspective, might it have some advantages for people living in Chiswick? As I understand it with the residents discount it will cost us £1.50 per day that you use the car and in most cases that will only apply if we cross to the other side of the North Circular.If there is a single zone for the whole of London that means that we can drive into central London at no charge again - not that there will be many reasons to do so but it is nice to know you can.It will also substantially reduce traffic in the area and make a jam a rarity.Of course I appreciate there are a host of other reasons that it is a completely insane idea not least because it will force lots of people onto public transport at the worst possible time, drive hundreds if not thousands of businesses to the wall and cause an increase in food costs therefore hitting the poorest hardest but I can't see how it would be a personal disaster for me or anyone else on a reasonable income who doesn't rely on the car to get to work or to do their job. I 100% believe that this government is Machiavellean and unprincipled enough to force the change on Sadiq Khan in a bid to undermine his election chances and I don't need much convincing that this is being driven by personal animosity towards him from Andrew Gilligan the actual Minister for Transport. However, I also believe that this government is institutionally stupid and all their plans will inevitably backfire so it could end up that people either recognise what they are up to and blame them for the consequences or are quietly pleased that the Zone 3-6 riff-raff are being kept off our streets just as residents of the original zone were happy to be rid of Zone 2 riff raff like us.

Francis Rowe ● 2205d44 Comments ● 2201d

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads 'backed up' with traffic

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads 'backed up' with trafficGrant Shapps warns he is 'not prepared to tolerate' badly designed closures and cycle lanes, imposing 'sweeping changes' to communities. The Transport Secretary has admitted too many cycle lanes are being left “unused” with traffic “backed up” as a result of his green transport revolution, The Telegraph can reveal.In a strongly worded letter sent to councils, Grant Shapps has warned he is “not prepared to tolerate” badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes which are imposing “sweeping changes” to entire communities.And in a move that will infuriate cycling and green campaigners, he has declared the Government is not anti-car, explaining: “No one should be in doubt about our support for motorists.”Mr Shapps announced a £250 million Emergency Active Travel Fund in May intended to promote walking and cycling as the country emerged from lockdown. Councils were invited to apply for the cash by drawing up projects intended to entice people away from their cars and take more active forms of travel.However, critics have complained that badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes have in fact increased traffic and pollution on main roads, as well as reduced the number of people visiting high streets at a time when small businesses are desperate to recover from lockdown.Private residents have even launched legal action, claiming that because the schemes were introduced under emergency Covid powers, disability groups, local residents and businesses were not consulted, and consequently, normal local democratic procedures have been ignored.Meanwhile, so-called ‘Low Traffic Neighbourhoods’, where bollards and planters close off residential streets to traffic, have resulted in delays to 999 emergency response times as police, paramedics and fire crews encounter newly shut roads.The letter, sent on Friday to local authority transport bosses and local highways authorities and seen by The Telegraph, warns how a “notable number of councils used their funding poorly and were simply out of step with the needs of the local communities.”Mr Shapps continues: “I saw or heard from the public and parliamentary colleagues about far too many instances where temporary cycles lanes were unused due to their location and design, while their creation left motor traffic backed up alongside them; of wide pavements causing unnecessary congestion in town centres; and other issues that many have, rightly, reacted angrily to.”He explains how he had ordered his staff to “engage” with those councils where he had “concerns”, because badly thought out road closures and cycle lanes had been introduced.“Since then, numerous schemes have been scaled back and revised,” he wrote. “I am pleased with this, but the work will continue where local residents continue to have concerns.”He warns the second round of funding in the scheme could see some town halls receiving “considerably less” money if they fail to “embrace good design” or “consult their local communities”.He adds: “We all want to see the benefits that active travel brings to be realised, but poorly implemented schemes will make no friends for the policy or more broadly for active travel…“The crucial test is, does it deliver for the community it serves, and has it been done with their consultation.“Schemes must balance the needs of cyclists and pedestrians with the needs of other road users, including motorists and local businesses.“Only authorities which have passed these key tests will receive the funding they have asked for.“I want to be absolutely clear: we are not prepared to tolerate hastily introduced schemes which will create sweeping changes to communities without consultation, and ones where the benefits to cycling and walking do not outweigh the dis-benefits for other road users.”With The letter comes after thousands of people have held demonstrations and signed petitions forcing some town hall bosses into a series of humiliating U-turns after they introduced schemes with little or no public consultation.Last week, the Telegraph revealed how some councils were making hundreds of thousands of pounds in fines from motorists driving on newly closed roads.Projects in some parts of London have proven so divisive that planters have been daubed with graffiti and bollards ripped from the concrete. In one West London borough, opposition has been so vehement that police have had to attend to support council workers as they installed planters and bollards to close roads.So far, a total of £42,102,454 has been secured by 111 councils in England, including many London boroughs where opposition has been most vocal.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/10/17/transport-secretary-admits-new-cycle-lanes-leaving-roads-backed/

Mark Perry ● 2204d43 Comments ● 2202d

Paul Campbell vs The Truth

Yesterday it was brought to my attention Paul now thinks I'm a prominent trader. Interesting given his numerous attempts here and elsewhere to paint me as the complete opposite. Also interesting was his taking something I said completely out of context and stated how my "suggestion was incorporated into a letter to the Council that was copied to all of the local Councillors." Odd. I never was asked. Nor did I sign anything. Surely I should have given my consent? After all, I'm now a prominent trader who wasn't asked to sign a letter akin to the one a film maker and dermatologist wrote on urban planning issues, something they are uniquely unqualified to comment on.Today Paul posted a lovely picture of a barren High Road saying something or other about cycling, peak school rush, and no traffic. The picture was taken outside of the police station looking west. West. When most schools are north, south and east. he took a photo aimed west. He posted at 8:40am.Odd.Surely the peak school rush is before 8:40. So I thought to myself of all the parents we've spoken to over all the years we've been prominent traders and I did a little Google. I simply love Google.In chronological order, here are the schools I could think of with their start times (arrivals would be earlier):8:00 - Orchard House8:00 - Falcons8:25 - Latymer 8:30 - Chiswick School8:30 - Kew8:30 - Harrodian (mind you, the bridge is closed)8:30 - Ravenscourt Prep8:30 - West London Free (staggered until 9:15)8:30 - Godolphin Latymer8:40 - PAUL TAKES HIS PICTURE LOOKING WEST8:45 - William Hogarth8:55 - St Peters9:00 - International9:00 - Belmont9:00 - St Pauls (again, bridge is closed)Also worth noting today's traffic in general was lighter than usual most likely down to our new Tier-2 status. And there were plenty of kids in street cloths today, not uniforms, suggesting half term has begun. At the very least, it wasn't the average school day.So I'll leave readers with the question: would you believe a prominent trader or would you believe one who fabricates the truth and misrepresents others without their consent to further his agenda?I've come to expect nothing less from Paul.I do, however, expect much more for all of Chiswick. I think we all deserve more from each other and certainly from Hounslow Cabinet. I haven't yet given up on the concept of proper, transparent representation and debate. Paul, on the other hand, just killed it.

David Lesniak ● 2205d12 Comments ● 2202d