Forum Topics

An amalgamation to Lbh of the four cpz (SOTG/RV/CS/FR) into one area

Ive been emailed to post this for someone (Please don't ask who and and questions relating to it as I'm clueless to this and does not directly effect myself) SOTG/RV/CS/FR AREA TRAFFIC MEASURES.There is considerable discussion being expressed locally about the disparity of traffic measures in the area comprising SOTG/RV/CS/FRPROPOSALSOTG is one of four CPZ within an area roughly bounded by Sutton Court Road the A4 the River and the A316. The other three CPZ are CS Chiswick Station (which includes Hartington Road), RV Riverview and FS Fauconberg.Whilst being virtually a self contained area none of the four have a common traffic policy under Lbh's current Traffic Measures.SOTG cannot use Hartington Road northbound.CS cannot use Thames Road to go to or come from Kew Bridge.RV being between cameras can use both Hartington and Thames Road.FS can use neither.None of the four cpz can exit onto the A4 via Harvard Hill as It is closed off to outgoing traffic.NOTEElmwood Road is historically in the GP zone but would be included under this scheme.SOLUTIONSOGA proposes an amalgamation of this area into one benefitting from the same traffic measures and controlled by timed ANPR cameras (red dots) as per attached map.With time controlled cameras linked to ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) at the following points: Kew Bridge / Hartington Road / Sutton Court Railway Bridge / Fauconberg Road / Elmwood Road and Harvard Hill the area becomes one whilst retaining their separate CPZ designations but benefitting from common traffic measures whilst remaining open to visitors deliveries taxis and shoppers but closed to rat running and the 'access only' along Strand on the Green and Thames Road would become redundant.SoGA has put this scheme to Lbh Traffic and subsequently discussed it in greater detail on a Zoom meeting. As the existing traffic measures are new to the area Lbh Traffic require time to assess both their impact locally and the overall effect caused from displaced rat running traffic.COVID has had implications on the timing of both the introduction of the traffic measures and the Thames Road cameras and consequently the subsequent review which will now not be before June/July

Julian Pavey ● 1951d20 Comments ● 1947d

Hounslow Planning U-turn on the bowls club

Putt in the Park's planning application, which would involve the destruction of the bowling green, was refused once, then recommended for refusal a second time, when the decision was deferred, so the Masterplan could be taken into account. Much time has elapsed and the Masterplan has not yet materialised. Putt in the Park put in a 'new' (actually third) application, practically identical, but ensuring by this manoeuvre that the 50+ objections sent in at the time of the first application would not be counted! So now they can say only a handful of objections were received! People understandably expected that objecting once to a proposal would be enough. Irrespective of the merits or demerits of the case, this is a despicable way to behave.And, suddenly, Hounslow Planning has reversed itself and is recommending approval! What happened to 'contravention of Policy CLI of the Hounslow Local Plan - loss of D2 community facility' and contravention of Hounslow's Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy? One would be forgiven for believing there was some serious arm-twisting and pressure exerted to ensure the CIC can bulldoze through the community's objections and ignore the massive support for the retention of bowling in GP, including a 620-name petition.The whole thing stinks. And, once again, we can do nothing against yet another brazen abuse of power.And, of course, Hounslow Planning has also reversed its own decision on the car parking application and has now recommended approval ... No doubt the parking company (who are not going to be paid a management fee) are already rubbing their hands in glee at the prospect of making a bomb in fines

bela cunha ● 1954d11 Comments ● 1948d