Forum Topics

God help us!

At a South Carolina rally on the eve of the Democratic primary, the president also sought to manage expectations about the White House’s response to the outbreak.NORTH CHARLESTON, S.C. — President Donald Trump on Friday night tried to cast the global outbreak of the coronavirus as a liberal conspiracy intended to undermine his first term, lumping it alongside impeachment and the Mueller investigation.He blamed the press for acting hysterically about the virus, which has now spread to China, Japan, South Korea, Iran, Italy and the U.S, and he downplayed its dangers, saying against expert opinion it was on par with the flu.“The Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. They're politicizing it,” he said. “They don't have any clue. They can't even count their votes in Iowa. No, they can't. They can't count their votes. One of my people came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia.’ That did not work out too well. They could not do it. They tried the impeachment hoax.”Then Trump called the coronavirus “their new hoax.”Trump’s comments came as the White House has struggled to adequately respond to and contain the coronavirus’s increasingly sweeping path. At the rally — held here on the eve of the Democratic primary in South Carolina — he sought to manage Americans’ expectations about the White House’s ability to fight it.By undermining the news reporting on the virus and by trying to hold liberals responsible for a potential public health crisis that has little to do with politics, Trump did what he often does best: He sought to deflect blame at a time when many Americans sought leadership and scientific facts.After Trump had downplayed the risks of coronavirus, he reassured supporters that the White House was “magnificently organized” in fighting it. In fact, Trump’s administration spent the week jockeying among themselves to lead the response, while the stock market tumbled with losses not seen since the global financial crisis in 2008. White House officials and the president grew so concerned this week that Trump put Vice President Mike Pence in charge of the response effort, swapping out his beleaguered health secretary.None of that came up on Friday night, as Trump trash-talked his Democratic opponents in 2020 and characterized the coronavirus as the latest issue touching on border security.“Whether it is the virus that we're talking about or many other public health threats, the Democrat policy of open borders is a direct threat to the health and well-being of all Americans. Now, you see it with the coronavirus. You see it. You see it with the coronavirus. You see that. When you have this virus or any other virus or any other problem coming in, it's not the only thing that comes in through the border and we are setting records now at the border,” Trump said.Earlier in the week, the Trump administration tried to allay Americans’ concerns about the virus by downplaying the coronavirus’s seriousness. Trump also congratulated himself for shutting down flights between the U.S. and China.But by the end of the week, White House officials including the president had shifted to pushing back against anyone who expressed too much concern about the virus or its effect on the economy, repeatedly blaming the Democrats and the media for the growing concerns and the steep drop in the stock market amid the uncertainty.“It’s the unknown, you know, they look at it, and they say how long will this last. I think they’re not very happy with the Democrat candidates when they see them, and I think that has an impact,” Trump said at the White House on Friday afternoon before traveling to the campaign rally.Top White House officials kept up the same mantra all day Friday.The director of the National Economic Council Larry Kudlow told reporters that “people should not overreact” — from investors to everyday Americans. "Given what we know factually, it looks to me like the market had gone too far,” Kudlow said.Acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney talked about the ongoing coverage of the coronavirus as an attempt by the media to politically damage the president during an election year.Health officials, meanwhile, spent the last two days trying to determine how a California resident became infected with coronavirus and who else the patient may have exposed to it. This was the first potential case of coronavirus in the U.S. that had not been contracted from traveling abroad and potential sign it could spread throughout the U.S.That wasn’t the message on Air Force One on the flight down to South Carolina, with the televisions turned to Fox News. In the bubble the president travels in, the TV headlines told the world the president had a “firm grasp” on the coronavirus and that Democrats tried to score “political points” on it.

Vanessa Smith ● 2441d10 Comments ● 2439d

Cars, Cherry Trees, Chiswick and Carbon

The last-minute cancellation of the planting of 16 cherry trees on Turnham Green, the unfortunate saga that has become known as ‘cherrygate’ got me thinking about carbon capture by trees. How much do trees actually mitigate climate change and how much carbon do they absorb? What was the effect of Councillor Biddolph's  last-minute intervention to stop the planting in environmental terms?I should declare my conflict of interest as ownership and occasional use of a family car as well as regular cyclist.I’ve posted recently on here about cars and Chiswick. I wonder why we have to put up with quite so much motorised traffic on the Chiswick High Road, when a much of it is travelling through our neck of the woods to avoid congestion on the A4 and A40 and contributing nothing to the local economy, whilst making the place noisy, polluted, more dangerous and less pleasant. Similarly why do we put up at all with cut through traffic in the roads where many of us live, our residential side streets. Side streets could be turned in to low-traffic neighbourhoods which could be driven in and out of and through. Perhaps Kings Street and Chiswick High Road could be restricted more to local Hammersmith/ Chiswick/ Brentford traffic and electric buses.Anyway back to trees:According to an academic article in ‘Forestry’ in 1999, The average car (driving 12,000 miles a year) then produced 1.1 tonnes of carbon a year. And interestingly real world emissions from cars has only reduced slightly since then then, perhaps because larger cars are more fashionable. (see Chiswick)The author calculates that to absorb the annual carbon emissions from the average car, THIRTY-TWO widely-spaced wild cherry trees would be required. Thirty-eight oak trees would do the same or forty-two poplars. So on Turnham Green, if the donated sixteen cherry trees had been planted as agreed by the Friends of Turnham Green, and they has similar capacity, they would have absorbed about half the CO2 produced by an average family car per year and would have done the equivalent of this every year for about 45 years.We’ve got a couple of cherry trees in our garden which we love (sadly not big enough to be widely-spaced, but never mind). So assuming roughly the same CO2 absorbing capacity this gives me roughly 750km (466miles) of car driving a year. This highlighted a couple of things to me. Firstly that Councillor Biddolph’s cancelling of the planting has prevented the carbon offsetting over the trees over their lifetime of the equivalent of driving a one family car for about 20 years.Secondly that quite that a lot of trees are actually required to offset the average car, so obviously it’s best not to drive or catch Ubers if other options are easily available. A third of trips by car in London are under 2 kilometres and one in seven under 1 kilometer (which takes about 10 minutes for someone healthy to walk) so the message needs to gain a bit more traction.Just for fun and giving the cherrygate councillor's previous hostility to people cycling and protected cycle paths: The CO2 emissions from cycling are approximately 5% of those of driving. The carbon dioxide in this situation comes from the fuel used to power muscles i.e. food (and methane from animal and human guts!)  So we can calculate that 16 cherry trees would offset the carbon produced by one person cycling 120,000 km per year (which is round the world three times) or alternatively 16 cherry trees can offset carbon emissions for about 50 people cycling into central London and back daily Monday to Friday for 42 weeks a year.

Edward Seaton ● 2446d35 Comments ● 2440d

High Road Task Force

What has happened to the Task Force which was set up 18 months ago? Some comments here about getting behind local councillors which is spot on but I can't find out what has been happening.  Worrying to walk down CHR and Devonshire Road on Saturday, and to then go to Hammersmith where there was a huge Christmas market and a vibrancy I have not felt here for years. It was reported on this website in July 2018  that they were drawing up an action plan with local businesses. The campaign had four major priorities;- influencing policy makers, nationally and locally, to ensure that policies support, rather than hinder, our independent retailers- explaining to landlords and agents that huge leaps in rent drive out independents and are changing Chiswick’s shopping streets and character for ever- guiding businesses looking to set up shop in Chiswick on how to make a success of it- persuading residents and visitors to change their behaviour and put independent shopping on their shopping lists.I am a surveyor and offered to help with a Tenants' Club to share info and make sure rents that were agreed were fair.  No response.   Surely things like the refusal on the consent for the new use at the Bread Shop should not have happened if the first priority had been actioned? The Government are keen to help saying "But in order to evolve successfully, high streets must meet the needs of their local community and the key to this is strong local leadership."Why aren't things like Christmas markets (as in Hammersmith), shop local campaigns (as in Ealing) and other ideas being brought in?  Do residents and traders need to join up better to get things done? There are a lot of talented people in W4

Ollie Saunders ● 2523d104 Comments ● 2440d