Forum Topics

Telling the truth re Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

It is important to tell the truth, not put out CIC propaganda, so I would like to correct some of the points in Cllr Lambert's statement about the bowls club:'the bowls club was wound up by the members/committee' - trying to make it sound as if it was our decision; in fact it was forced upon us by the CIC who ordered us to be out by Jan 2020'it had 22 members of whom 12 were active' - wrong: there was a petition signed by 21 playing members who wanted the club to continue'They maintained the green themselves with some help from Capel Manor' - the vast majority of the work was carried out by the members; there was occasionally some help from Capel Manor students who in exchange benefited from learning greenkeeping skills'the lease called for them to maintain the clubhouse, however the CIC stepped in to do so at times at a cost of around £2 per annum' - three longstanding members say they have no idea where this claim came from; there was no regular contribution from the CIC, in fact no one can remember any contribution except something to do with some fire alarm/equipment'they believed membership would grow after the delayed sports hub was completed but the development is many months late' - CIC should have kept a proper check on working practices and (the lack of) progress. The delays were not our fault so couldn't CIC have waited a few months to give us a chance to grow the membership?'Most of the bowlers have moved on to other clubs or retired' - again, not because we wanted to but because we have been forced to retire in the case of those without cars who want to respect the instruction not to travel unnecessarily on public transport'It's not clear there would be anyone to fix the green' - a number of volunteers have offered to do so. Before the club was kicked out, Capel Manor offered to take over the greenkeeping provided the club was allowed to stay. The CIC wouldn't even consider it'The CIC is supposed to grow the use of the park' - how does killing off one of the park's longest-established activities contribute to that? Why could no other place in the park be found for the pitch and putt so that both activities could co-exist? 'pitch and putt mooted to attract 3000 players per year' - apart from the wildly optimistic numbers, if golf is so important to the park why was the previous pitch and putt eliminated rather than relocated?

Bela Cunha ● 2288d7 Comments ● 2273d