Forum Topics

Unsolved West London Murders.

In March 2023, The commissioner of the Met Police Sir Mark Rowley admitted the force has 'racists, misogynists and homophobes' in its ranks – as Home Secretary Suella Braverman blasted 'serious failings of culture, leadership and standards' at Scotland Yard. On 6th April I sent a lengthy email to Mark Rowley pleading with him to review The Hammersmith Nudes' murders of the 1960's. I told him that I am in contact with adult children and other members of 6 of the murder victims.  I told him that many of the victims' family members are convinced that if the victims were police women, doctors, nurses or solicitors there would have been a review. On April 11 I recieved the following."Dear Mr Milkins,My apologies for the delayed response. I have forwarded this matter to the appropriate team for their review and direct reply to you.Kind regards,*****  ********      *********  | Inspector | Staff Officer to the Commissioner."Today I received a a phone call from New Scotland Yard followed by the following email.Dear Mr Milkins "It was good to speak to you on the phone just now, and as promised, I am emailing to confirm my details. I recognise the huge amount of dedication you have put into your investigations and I am sorry that these terrible murders remain unsolved, despite your efforts.There have been various reviews conducted regarding these cases over the years and I know you were in contact with DC Paul Rogers in 2007, and most recently, DC Adam Bailey in 2020. It remains the case as per DC Bailey’s letter that the links between Harold Jones and the victims are not substantive enough to enable a definitive finding that he was responsible for their deaths. I hope you understand that because Jones died in 1971 and there is no additional material further to what has been looked at in the above reviews, we won’t be reviewing the cases again at this time.Having said that, I know you are determined to continue with your work, and if there is something substantive and probative that you find that you would like to bring to our attention in the future, please do so.I wish you all the best."DC *****   ****** | CSC - Major InquiriesSpecial Casework TeamTHE MUST GO ON. AND IT WILL.

Neil Milkins ● 1249d1 Comments ● 1248d

English towns selected for Microwaving

These won’t be the first, as the town of Wennington was hit last summer under the guise of a wildfire. This was on a small scale compared to the microwaving attacks that California has come under in recent years but significant nonetheless; it means that the UK is now a target and the equipment has been tested, along with public reaction. As with California, the Wennington fires mainly destroyed things that don’t burn easily, such as buildings of standard construction and vehicles, whilst vegetation and other materials that do burn easily such as wood, plastic, cloth etc. were largely left untouched.  To maximise the terror, the government has installed Emergency Alerts to every mobile phone in the country, and wildfires have been given as a reason for their introduction. These Emergency Alerts are due to be tested at 3pm on Sunday 23rd of this month. Similar to the Covid scam, the conspirators will want to be seen as carers and saviours, and the alerts provide this opportunity. The alerts also provide the opportunity to ‘justifiably’ terrorise many more people than those who will be directly affected. If, for example, Chiswick is selected for microwaving, texts can be sent to residents of neighbouring towns such as Ealing and Hammersmith, so they will also run out of their homes screaming, maybe in the middle of the night.  With all the scaremongering about climate change, the Wennington microwaving test last summer and now the introduction of Emergency Alerts, English towns are clearly set to go up in smoke this summer, and will already have been selected.When the ‘wildfires’ come, we will inspect the evidence together.

Michael Brown ● 1257d32 Comments ● 1249d

23 Sutton Court Road - Selling at 100% profit!

Would you like to make over 100% return on your property in under a year?? That's exactly what the new owner of 23 Sutton Court Road - now Baycroft would like to do.Local residents may recall the planning decision that enabled One Housing Group to demolish a beautiful Victorian Villa to make way for MUCH NEEDED' over 55s housing - after lengthy abandonment of the site, significant delays and a low quality development, One Housing Group bailed on the completed project and sold it in July 2022 for £3.8 million.The new owner bought the property for £3.8 million in July 2022 and has allowed it to sit idle for almost a year - with some guardians in place. They have done nothing at all to the property and are now attempting to sell the individual flats for over 100% profit in less than a year by simply applying to have the over 55 restriction removed (already refused in 2020). You can only imagine that their business plan is predicated on the assumption that our local planners are stupid; that they can't see through a pretty transparent plan and that they will be too intimated to uphold a legitimate planning restriction for fear of being seen to stand in the way of an indicated new mental health provision on the same site. On this, its worth remembering previous planners have also said that the developers do not understand the inadequacy of the site for anyone working through any sort of recovery - the amenity space is poor, the property is on possibly one of the busiest corners in Chiswick - we have all sat on Sutton Court Road and Barrowgate Road during morning, noon and evening rush hour and road rage.  The developer can hardly convince us all that they are concerned with providing a quality facility for proposed mental health patients - more likely that they are seeking to cash in on a vulnerable group. And at what price? a similar double asking price potentially charged to the NHS when we are paying doctors less than £14 per hour? they are a pure for-profit entity - will we be fleeced by them as tax payers as well as having them trash our planning process?Please consider objecting - send these opportunistic profiteering developers packing - enforce the over 55's restriction and ask them to price them appropriately for the over 55s market - give our local over 55s community the opportunity to downsize, free up much needed family homes, give our essential workers over 55 an option to buy OR tell the developer to rent or lease to over 55s if they want a return on investment. They bought knowing the restriction was there - let them deal with it.We would have to ask serious questions if previous planning decisions were not defended. Objections need to be lodged by 20th April 2023 and can be registered by emailing directly to:planning.objections@hounslow.gov.uk using the System ref: P/2023/084923 Sutton Court RoadPS - These opinions are my own, and everyone is entitled to theirs! N

Niall Keegan ● 1253d11 Comments ● 1249d