Conservatives Start Petition Against Weltje Road Plan
Say formal consultation should take place before any decision
H&F Council says it is concerned by the number of collisions involving cyclists at the junction with King Street
August 23, 2026
Chiswick councillors say they have now been formally told that Hammersmith & Fulham Council (LBHF) intends to impose new access restrictions on Weltje Road.
As a result they have started a petition against the proposal which would be brought in through an Experimental Traffic Order (ETO).
They describe the proposal as a “beggar-thy-neighbour” proposal: a camera-enforced ban preventing anyone other than LBHF residents from using Weltje Road to reach the eastbound A4. Weltje Road is the final remaining access point between Chiswick Lane and Hammersmith Broadway, and councillors warn that closing it to non-residents would push an estimated 2,000–2,500 vehicles a day onto Chiswick Lane — a road they say is already under strain from displaced traffic following the closure of Rivercourt Road and the long-running restrictions at Hammersmith Bridge. This assumes that nearly all the vehicles currently using Weltje Road would switch to Chiswick Lane.
Cllr Linden Grigg, who is coordinating the campaign, said the proposal would heap pressure on roads that are already at capacity. He criticised LBHF for failing to consult Hounslow Council before drawing up the scheme, despite the clear impact on Chiswick residents and Hounslow’s road network. “Weltje Road is an important access route onto the A4 that drivers in Chiswick have used for years,” he said. “Close it off and much of that traffic is dumped onto Chiswick Lane, a road that is already full to bursting.”
Cllr Grigg added that while some cyclists argue the junction has a poor safety record, closing the road is the wrong solution. “The answer to a dangerous junction is to redesign it so cyclists and drivers can use it safely together, not to slam the road shut and push the traffic onto somebody else’s streets.”
Cllr Vickram Grewal said the proposal fits a familiar pattern: “Close a road, watch the traffic pile up somewhere else, and call it progress. We saw it with Hammersmith Bridge, we saw it with Rivercourt Road, and now it’s happening again on Weltje Road.” He warned that each closure adds minutes to everyday journeys and increases pollution on already-busy streets.
Cllr Gabriella Giles, Chairman of Hammersmith and Chiswick Conservatives, said the scheme risks repeating the confusion seen in other camera-controlled zones. She pointed to examples on Hartington, Staveley and Rivercourt Roads, where drivers have found themselves facing unclear signage and making dangerous last-minute manoeuvres. “If the same restriction and the same signage are used southbound on Weltje Road, I would expect exactly the same panicked manoeuvres, at a junction that is already among the most dangerous for cyclists in London,” she said. “Far from making the junction safer, this scheme risks making it worse.”
The opposition councillors claim that no consultation has taken place with Hounslow Council so far and the borough did not respond to a request for comment on the matter. For an ETO the statutory consultees include organisations such as the emergency services but no neighbouring boroughs but it is considered good practice to inform local authorities that might be affected by any changes.
Hammersmith & Fulham Council says that no decision has been made at this point but that over 2,000 vehicles use the Weltje Road cut through of which it claims 90% are from outside the borough. It says residents have been asking for sometime for the restriction which they believe would make the road safer and less polluted.
Emer O’Neill and Nassos Mouzouropoulos support the restriction saying that the Weltje Road junction has been measured as the fifth most dangerous in London and that the Rivercourt Road restriction has been a success, reducing traffic in the area without displacing it elsewhere. In response to concerns about difficulty accessing the A4, they say that Hounslow Council should reopen one of the roads in Chiswick currently closed off, if this was their priority.
They say, "The case for an LTN on Weltje Road is based on exceptional circumstances: dangerous conditions, heavy pollution, and the wellbeing of schoolchildren and residents. Some may attempt to frame this as a political issue, but it is not. It is a matter of common sense, safety, and responsible urban planning."
There is not, however, a consensus among residents of the road. Hammersmith Conservative activist Tim Janman says he has gathered signatures from 44 Weltje Road residents opposing any restrictions.
The Conservative petition calls on LBHF to scrap the proposal and to carry out formal consultation with Hounslow Council and any other affected neighbouring boroughs before taking any decision.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |