Man questioned on suspicion of voyeurism and making indecent images of children
A police investigation has been launched after an allegation was about a child protection issue at Hall School Wimbledon. The junior section of the school is in Putney Vale.
A 56-year-old man has been arrested in Merton on suspicion of voyeurism and possessing indecent images of children. He has been bailed pending further enquiries to a date in early May.
A police spokesman said they were still trying to establish where the alleged incident occurred. The Headmaster of the Hall School, Timothy Hobbs, has said in a letter sent to all parents that the allegation that images of children were taken at the school are 'malicious and have no foundation'.
According to a report in the Evening Standard the allegations were first made when an individual complained to the Department for Education. Soon afterward, on 23 February, OFSTED made a snap inspection of the school focusing on child protection issues. The conclusions of this report were published on 15 March and found that the school's safeguarding policy was not implemented effectively. It stated, "Staff, including designated safeguarding leaders, have an inconsistent understanding of the school’s procedure for photographing pupils. The school has a clear policy on staff members’ use of mobile phones and most staff spoken to said they would not use a personal mobile phone to photograph pupils. However, leaders said that it is acceptable if the images are then deleted."
Six days after the publication of the report the Met’s Sexual Offences, Exploitation and Child Abuse Command launched an investigation.
In his letter to parents send on 18 April Timothy Hobbs said, "We believe that the allegations were malicious and have no foundation. Whilst we are not clear as to the exact nature of the allegations, we understand that they were made by an unnamed individual."
He also states that no complaint about the matter has been made directly to the school and there have been no recent safeguarding concerns expressed from any source. He also disputed strongly the conclusions of the OFSTED report and said he was 'surprised and disappointed' by their findings.
The school has declined requests for further comment.
April 26, 2017