ISSUE: Phone Masts High Court Judge believes the Rosslyn Park 02 mast should be removed. Council
planners were right to tell a mobile phone company to pull down Mr
Justice Sullivan found that a government inspector had been wrong
to uphold an appeal by O 2 after the council had ordered the mast's The inspector had concluded that the council was prevented from taking action because it had let the mast go ahead in the first place. In accepting this ruling the secretary of state had also erred. The
council's victory puts the ball back in the secretary of state's The
council had told the company in January 2001 that because the The mast had been erected without planning permission on the basis that its height was below 15 metres. Investigations subsequently confirmed that the height for planning purposes was over the 15 metre limit. Local people had objected to the installation. Planning chairman Ravi Govindia said: "Quite
simply the inspector got it wrong. The only reason the mast had "Once the mast was erected and it became clear that it was at least two metres above the limit the council was right to seek its removal. "This
is an important decision in an area of planning law where there
is 5.02.03 4 phone masts turned down 21.03.02 Outrage regarding two planning proposals Further technical reports required re Egliston Lawns proposal Local residents comment on the Orange Transmitter
|
|