Forum Topic

I think we all agree that rehydration breaks for all games is a terrible idea and the US precedent should not be repeated. It's not just us but also UEFA and all major leagues.Although dehydration breaks have been around for over a decade in the Premier League, there was a sum total of zero last season as pitch temperatures never met the threshold. There were breaks for players on a Ramadan fast.There are dehydration breaks taking place in matches across Europe at the moment because of the very hot weather. There will be none in the Premier League unless these thresholds are reached. The way it is calculated means that the temperature may rise to 35 degrees but there might be no break if there are other mitigating factors.It is wrong to presume that fitness makes professional sports people immune to the effects of dehydration. Although they are some benefits this is offset by them sweating more efficiently than an unfit person meaning their fluid loss is greater. When you are dehydrated chemical processes in your body stop working properly and a high level of fitness is not a full protection against that.The game I referred to earlier was a lesson learned but thankfully the parents didn't sue. I now recall it was actually in October not September and we were aware it was going to be unseasonably warm but it didn't occur to us that we would encounter such issues with the temperature just over 20 degrees. You may feel this makes it a good thing that I have no more day to day involvement in youth sport - you may be right.I detect a desire to make an issue of something out of nothing here. Nobody in football wants mid-half break. FIFA compromised for the World Cup for financial reasons but I don't think this will be repeated. Under normal circumstances players are allowed to take on water as the game progresses and this has been the situation for half a century.If you believe that even in extreme temperatures hydration breaks are unnecessary, you are probably wrong. The water replacement necessary in such conditions is measured in litres. Marathon runners and cyclists can take this on progressively as needed but footballers do need a dedicated break to ensure they are able to get the fluid they need. If you think that makes them coddled then I suspect there is nothing I could say to make you change your mind.

Francis Rowe ● 2d

"Francis, can you point us in the direction of instances where PL players have become ill due to dehydration?"Perhaps it would be easier for you to speak to someone with a medical background and they will explain to you that dehydration makes you ill.For Premier League players, dehydration is rarely the only factor in them missing a subsequent fixture but it does happen. The only example I can find where it was the sole reason for a player being unavailable for this reason was Jermaine Defoe back in 2009 but there are multiple other examples of it being a contributory factor. This is despite Premier League players being put on a IV drip after a game if they are believed to be severely dehydrated.For non-professionals, I can give you lots of examples. I was helping out at a youth fixture some time ago. It was in late September and we hadn't prepared properly not anticipating the heat. The game was played at noon and in full sunshine although the temperature was probably only a few degrees over 20. We ran out of water by half time and several of the boys were very unwell by the end of the game - with bad headaches and a number had to miss school the next day (these were boys who would be looking for an excuse to do so).On the 1970s World Cup, it should be remembered that, although hydration breaks were not introduced, it was the first time water bottles were allowed on the pitch.  I am too young to have seen any of these games live but even from the highlights you can see the intensity and pace of these games is well below the way the game is currently played. The ball in play time is also well below current levels because refs were much laxer on time wasting so an England game in 1970 was actually much shorter than an England game in 2026 perhaps by as much as 15 minutes when you take into account not as much injury time being added in those days. True, there was only one sub but even so - this is not a like for like comparison.

Francis Rowe ● 2d