Forum Topic

“The Tory analysis suggests that the number of working-age households receiving more than £30,000 a year in benefits has climbed by more than a third to 800,000 since the Department for Work and Pensions started using administrative data on incomes people actually receive instead of relying on asking them in surveys.Of those, some 667,278 households took more than the average salary of £32,200 a year in 2023-24 – a record high and up 30 per cent on the previous year. The number dropped to 625,618 in 2024-25, but was still double the 392,000 in 2019-20.The 600,000-plus families accounted for one in 30 of all households in Britain. Of those, 267,000 received more than £40,000 a year, 91,000 were paid more than £50,000 and 16,289 received more than £60,000 a year in 2024-25 – an 8.5 per cent increase on the previous year.The benefit cap, introduced in 2013 by George Osborne, the then Tory chancellor, was designed to limit the maximum amount of benefits that a working-age household can receive, to encourage people into work.But if the household includes one adult in receipt of disability benefit, even if there are other adults in the family who are fully able to work, they all avoid the benefit limit.The Tories are proposing to close this loophole, which allows uncapped benefits for a whole household if just one adult is eligible for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip).They would require all adults who were able to work to be employed for at least 16 hours a week and face a cap if they were not.”

Steve Taylor ● 1h

Austerity policies, introduced after the great global banking fraud, were justified by a study, Growth in a Time of Debt, by economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff. It said that debt above 90% of GDP significantly slows economic growth. Osborne, the EU and other countries cited it in justifying austerity. It contradicted earlier Keynesian theory that government intervention was necessary when growth stalls to stabilise the economy and stimulate demand and growth.The study by Rhenihardt and Rogoff was not peer reviewed and the data it was based on not made available. Other Economists later obtained the data and found spreadsheet errors, which undermine the theory and which are now acknowledged by R and R. Since austerity, debt has grown from around 74% of GDP, low in historic terms, to 93%. It is now generally acknowledged that growth is the way to bring it down.How was such extreme policy adopted, based on a non peer reviewed paper with a spreadsheet error.There were alternate economic views at the time. They said the best way out of the debt, caused by bailing out the banks, which were at risk due to colossal fraud, was through growth, underpinned by gov't spending. These alternate voices were given less prominence.A recent study into BBC bias found that it was not politically biased, but is was criticised for economic bias. Reporting the Rhenhardt Roggoff view, used by Osborne to justify austerity, whilst not putting forward  alternative views, was one of the examples. The whole mainstream media did it. It made it seems as though austerity was the best and only option. No one reported that the paper was non peer reviewed and the data it was based on wasn't available. One effect of the banking fraud, austerity and QE; or printing money which was given to banks,  has been to increase asset values and  accelerate an already growing wealth gap. The wealth of the top 10% has increased by 280% since 2008.The poorest 50% of people in the UK now own 5% of the wealth. In real terms what this looks like is food banks, homelessness, crime, insecurity, fear and support for populist politics.

Kathleen Healy ● 20h

Jayne ThorburnDate/Time: 30/04/26 11:45:00"This has nothing to do with youth clubs and the element of society causing this trouble wouldn't go anyway. Then we have Zack, Green Party stating the police were heavy handed with the guy who stabbed 2 people because they used a taser seriously. The greens are big trouble if they think it was heavy handed. Lawless London is down to Sadiq super poor policing policy.  Shoplifting, too much money via welfare, high youth unemployment, these people are bored and think it’s funny to terrorise society. Poor parenting lock them all up in youth offenders places, make them work for nothing hard labour thats the answer. We have no deterrents at all."Talk about hysteria! Didn't you forget bring back the birch? Oh! and what about the stocks? - is there room for a set along Chiswick High Rd. or perhaps they could be on Turnham Green? Let's be honest a lot of today's crime - stealing mobiles for one - is because daft people will insist on wandering along nattering and waving the blasted things  about - just asking for some light fingered individual to whip said 'phone straight out of their hands? And those people who get cars broken into when they will insist - against all sensible advice - on leaving  belongings on display just asking for someone to steal them? That's not to say that everything is rosy but it is hardly the dystopian vision your post paints. And how this is all the fault of The Mayor or the Green Party is another daft assumption, no doubt you'll be saying that if this country is daft enough to listen to right-wing nutjobs and their tough-guy utterances then all will be sweeteness and light. Dream on.

Vanessa Smith ● 3d