Forum Topic

But why did we suddenly need so many professionals from non-EU countries then? The numbers coming in after 2020 for quite a few years ( from EU and non-EU) were considerably more than the numbers who were coming in prior ( from non-EU and EU) to that point?It certainly looks like the flood gates were further opened in 2020 if you look at the graphs in:https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/long-term-international-migration-flows-to-and-from-the-uk/ You've mentioned you don't open links Steve, so I'll cut and paste a section of what's written in the "briefing" but the information is a lot easier to read in the original onlimne article ( and you can easily change the graphs to show net migration or immigration)This briefing covers the scale of immigration and net migration in the UK since the early 2000s and under the post-Brexit immigration system.Key PointsThe UK has experienced broadly similar levels of migration compared to other high-income countries, on average, over the past few decades. The share of migrants in the population is higher than in Japan or Denmark, and lower than Ireland or Canada.More…Net migration was 171,000 in 2025, lower than the levels seen during the 2010s and a sharp decline from the unusually high levels in 2022 and 2023. In 2025, 67% of non-EU immigration was for work and study purposes.More…EU citizens made up a majority of immigration and net migration in the run-up to the 2016 EU referendum. Since 2022, however, EU net migration has been negative, according to official estimates, with 42,000 more people leaving than arriving in 2025.More…While the emigration of international students has been rising, they have become more likely to stay in the UK since Brexit, contributing more to net migration than they had done in the past.More…There is net emigration of British citizens, with more leaving than returning. In 2025, this was estimated at 136,000, although the figures are highly uncertain. This is higher than previously published figures due to a change in methodology. There is not currently any evidence that emigration has increased since 2022, although fewer Brits are returning to the UK.More…Projections of future net migration are inherently uncertain. In the past 20 years, official projections have usually underestimated future net migration levels.More…Understanding the PolicyThe scale of UK migration is affected by immigration policies but also depends on other factors such as the state of the economy here and in countries of origin, demand for international study opportunities, and events and crises around the world. ... Click to read more.Understanding the EvidenceBroadly speaking, there are three main measures of the scale of migration to the UK: ... Click to read more.How do migration levels in the UK compare to those in other countries?Migration levels fluctuate from year to year, but over long periods, a useful measure of how much immigration a country has experienced is the size of the foreign-born population as a percentage of the population. Countries with high levels of net migration—defined as people immigrating minus those emigrating—develop larger foreign-born or migrant populations over the long run.According to ONS estimates, 19% of the UK’s population was foreign-born in June 2024, similar to shares in Spain and Germany (Figure 1). The UK had a smaller foreign-born population than Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. By contrast, the UK had a higher share of foreign-born people in its population compared to France, the United States, and most Eastern European countries, and a much higher share than Japan. Note, however, that the foreign-born shares reported for some countries shown in Figure 1 are based on survey data that underestimate the migrant population due to survey non-response.Figure 1The scale of migration to a country may have some economic impact, but research suggests that for many economic impacts, the composition of migration is more important than the numbers alone. Whether migrants are working and what skills and qualifications they bring are among the key factors that affect the impact of migration on public finances and productivity, for example. For more discussion of the economic impacts of migration, see the Migration Observatory briefings, The Fiscal Impacts of Immigration in the UK, and The Labour Market Effects of Immigration.Return to topHow many migrants came to the UK in 2025?Net migration is a commonly used measure of the overall scale of migration in the UK. It takes into account not just people moving to the country, but also those leaving. This helps understand migration’s contribution to population growth—especially since many people who move to the UK do not remain here permanently. However, the net migration measure also has flaws. For example, it tells us little about who is arriving and leaving or what their impacts are. It can also produce counterintuitive or misleading figures when migration patterns change substantially in a short period, as discussed further below. The UK is unusual in its choice to use net migration in policy debates as the main measure for discussing migration levels. See the Migration Observatory commentary, Net Migration: Frequently Asked Questions, for more information.Estimates from the Office for National Statistics suggest that total net migration was 171,000 in 2025. This figure is lower than net migration levels during the 2010s and represents a sharp decline compared to the year ending March 2023, when net migration peaked at a historical high of 944,000 (Figure 2).

Andrew Jones ● 7d

The UK Parliament knew absolutely years ago that there was a problem with climate change and fossil fuels but the dragging of feet together with the number of MPs with interests in and donations from billionaires, millionaires and companies and individuals connected to or in the oil and gas sector has made it much harder to divest and move on increasing the amount of alternative energy.Many people in many countries HAVE changed the way that they do things: the way that their products are made, what they are made of, the way that they are packed and transported.You now see photovoltaic cells on lots of buildings - or maybe you don't because many of them are not as visible as they used to be.  Regulations to build have changed so that buildings are expected to use less energy and to also create  some if not all of the energy that they use.  There are regulations also about buildings needing to be upgraded before they can be rented out.  Changes have been required and been happening for years.https://www.bbc.co.uk/articles/ckgel8vje4joUK sees surge in solar panels amid rising energy costsand that was April this year.The new Which? magazine has a lot of info on solar panels in it because so many people have not kept up with the costs and changes in these eg why you don't need a south facing roof (although it helps).Futurebuild at the Excel this year had a lot of people demonstrating how they are updating their buildings and methods of working and materials to use less energy.

Philippa Bond ● 15d

Interesting article today. “Those who believe these figures will somehow help save Starmer or doom Nigel Farage are engaging in wishful thinking. Immigration is here to stay as an issue and Reform will campaign on it in  Makerfield and across the country into the next general election and beyond.For a start, let’s consider numbers. The net figure of 171,000 is created by considering the numbers of those who arrived and those that left. While several hundred thousand people left Britain, a massive 800,000 arrived. Coupled with the asylum figures, this means nearly a million people came to Britain last year. This is a staggering number, and way beyond what most voters – and indeed all Reform voters – want.Until recently, the immigration debate was mainly about numbers; most voters simply wanted a reduction in numbers because they feared the effects  large-scale immigration on NHS waiting lists , competition for jobs, the availability of housing, and so on.Now the immigration debate has become something very different. It’s now about whether the country has the rule of law or not, given so many people seem to be able to breach our borders without governments being able to do anything to stop them. It’s now about fairness, given that asylum seekers have been put up in hotels and given benefits others are struggling to get (quick GP appointments, most obviously). And it’s also about national identity, given the perception that many councils are happy to promote multiculturalism, while  pulling English and British flags down from lampposts and suggesting national pride is linked to far-Right activity.There will, no doubt, be a small number of voters who think that the figures published today show that the Government is getting its act together and maybe even that Starmer is responsible. It’s possible a small number will also think immigration is an issue that has now been “dealt with”.But none of this will make much difference to the voters that really matter right now: the mass that is considering a Reform vote. They will still think immigration is too high and that the number of asylum claims shows we’re still a soft touch. Consequently, these numbers don’t change a basic fact: Starmer is  heading out of Downing Street , and Farage is heading into it.”

Steve Taylor ● 17d

Interesting article in the Telegraph. “If I had to come up with two words to explain what happened last Thursday, they would be these: immigration and unfairness. The British have an acute sense of fair play. It has been violated over and over by a Labour Government (and before that by the Tories) that puts the foreign and the idle before hard-working people who must go to the back of the queue in their own country.Why are 1.5 million migrants allowed to claim Universal Credit at a cost of billions? How the hell did 48 per cent of social housing in London end up being occupied by people who were not born in the UK?Only this week, we learnt that the Department for Work and Pensions has confirmed that “additional spouses” in polygamous marriages are being given a 4.8 per cent boost to their benefits, which “would most likely be for husbands with multiple wives”. This is a Christian country. Polygamy is not only illegal, it disgusts us. Do they not mock us, ladies and gentlemen? Do they raise taxes on families with two parents working all hours, who struggle to make ends meet, to subsidise their indolent neighbours flaunting stuff they cannot afford?Well, not anymore. It doesn’t much matter who the new Labour leader is because the old parties are living on borrowed time. The people voted again and again to curtail immigration and were ignored.In his dismal “reset speech”, a deluded and defensive Starmer had the gall to attack Reform. “We are not just facing dangerous times, but dangerous opponents. Very dangerous opponents… If we don’t get this right, our country will go down a very dark path.”Well, Prime Minister – a title you never deserved and won’t hold for much longer – the people know that we have already gone down a very dark path. It is you and your useless party that are the danger to our country. Forget a new prime minister; we need a general election and a change of government.”

Steve Taylor ● 28d