Forum Topic

Attacks on Chiswick women in the mid-nineties

Reading about the death of Carl Royal, for whom no tears will be said, dredged up some unpleasant memories. I remember when I first hear about the attacks I was uncertain if they were true. There was no internet in those days - well not for me anyway - and stories often circulated about terrible crimes. I don't recall much TV coverage and if you didn't buy the newspaper on the right day, you wouldn't get to hear about it. It wasn't until the trial that what actually happened was confirmed for most people.I was a daily commuter from Turnham Green at that time so started doing calculations of what were the chances of the victim having been me rather than someone else and the conclusion was terrifying. I never liked walking out of the station to home after dark but I started either calling my husband to collect me or using a cab from the rank if he was not around.As the memory of the crime faded, such precautions started to seem unnecessary and about a decade ago I stopped calling for a lift or getting a cab. Lone women, who had virtually disappeared from Chiswick streets after dark were returning and men's attitudes had changed, for instance crossing the road so they wouldn't be walking behind you. Last night I walked home alone late in the evening without a second thought. Crimes against women are far from a thing of the past and there is no room for complacency but Chiswick, London and the rest of the country are much safer now than they were thirty years ago. Some people seem determined to present London as a crime-ridden hell hole but the reality is that we, men as well as women, are probably safer now than we were at any point in our history.

Anita Blake ● 19d21 Comments

While I didn't live in Chiswick while these attacks were taking place, I would concur with Anita's view that the area, and London in general, feels a lot safer for women than it did at the end of the last century. There are a number of reasons why this might be the case - more CCTV, more sex offenders locked up due to improved DNA testing, Uber meaning a safe route home is always available, better street lighting, less public drunkeness and a greater awareness from men about behaviours that might make women feel unsafe at night. These factors seem to have combined to encourage more people, including lone women, to walk home after dark which in itself has made this feel more secure.Some men will point to the statistics on sex offences and claim that this makes women like me and Anita complacent and delusional but the rise in reports and convictions does not mean living in London has become more dangerous for women. The increase in offences since the nineties has been caused by many factors including the aforementioned DNA testing, proper attention being given to historic sex offences, tighter legal definition on consent and less of the kind of victim blaming that has crept into this thread.Violence against women and girls remains far too high and there is no room for complacency but we do need to recognise the progress being made and keep up pressure and not be distracted by false narratives about the nature of the problem.Around 0.2% of men end up being convicted of sex offences and the limited data that we have shows little difference in that number between ethnicities although the type of offending may differ. There are estimated to be about 600,000 asylum seekers and illegal immigrants in the country of which around 70% are in London. Inevitably some of them will be responsible for sex crimes but, as Philippa points out, any cases will inevitably be amplified in papers like the Daily Mail and Telegraph and then shared widely across social media. Even the BBC seems to have followed the path of giving promininet coverage to every sex crime involving a migrant while ignoring the much much larger proportion of those that do not.This has led to the simple minded or those who cleave to a narrative that suits their prejudices to talk about a migrant crime wave. Trump managed to get elected with similar rhetoric but, as with the US, the actual evidence shows that recent arrivals to the country are less likely to commit a criminal offence (if you exclude those related to immigration matters) than the rest of the population.While sexual offences have risen in London at the same time as the huge increase in the number of illegal workers since Brexit, the rises mirror those seen in other parts of the country. Despite most illegal workers being in London there has been no extra surge in sex crimes in the capital.My own experience suggests that women are most at risk not from men living on the margins of society but men in positions of power and responsiblity which too many seek to abuse. The horrors that are emerging from America about the activities of the very man who pushed the migrant crime lie the hardest should be a lesson to us here. When people spread falsehoods and say that they do so out of 'concern' for woment, we should be aware that is always the very last of their considerations.

Felicity Caborn ● 15d