Forum Topic

Vote REFORM

Stop the boatsCap legal immigration Stop the globalist agendaGet your country backNigel in chargeOust globalist puppets, Sunak & Starmer. Vote REFORM..

Michael Brown ● 265d97 Comments

One week from now, you have the opportunity to block The New World Order and stop the attack on humanity, at least here in the UK.Vote REFORM

Michael Brown ● 242d

These polls are pretty meaningless unless corrected for likely voting intentions. Around a third thought right wing candidates did better which tracks with the polls for the election. Farage's easy answers to complex questions are always going to convince more people in this sort of format. He has the luxury of being able to promise things he is never going to deliver and when subjected to the mildest of probing questions his nonsense falls apart such as when he was forced to admit his zero net immigration pledge was unworkable. Based on the proportion of people thinking someone they were unlikely to consider voting for was the winner, Stephen Flynn seems to have come out on top.

Felicity Caborn ● 260d

“ Nigel Farage won Friday night’s seven-way BBC election debate, a snap poll has found.The survey of 1,031 voters, by More in Common, found the new Reform UK leader had come out on top in the debate, followed by Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy. He received 25 per cent of the vote, with Ms Rayner on 19 per cent.The Green Party’s Carla Denyer was the third most popular, with 11 per cent, the SNP’s Stephen Flynn received 10 per cent and the Conservatives’ Penny Mordaunt took seven per cent.”

Steve Taylor ● 260d

All polls had farage ahead except newspapers own polls who are left leaning.But all the major polls had farage ahead by a winning margin and not 2%

Julian Pavey ● 261d

It seems from recent poll that Farage won the BBC debate

Steve Taylor ● 261d

So no change there, then.

Roger Talbot ● 262d

Yep. We will have an inept government and a toothless opposition.

Steve Taylor ● 262d

If Kermit and his band of Little englanders do enough damage to the Tories it could be the Lib Dems

David Burke ● 262d

I am beginning to wonder which party will be the official opposition in Westminster on July 5th, the Lib-Dems, the Conservatives or the Reform party. Not the SNP.

Chris Dakers ● 262d

Okey dokey Fishy. I've done you the courtesy of going back to your post of 5 June @ 19.45 and didn't realise that it was directed at me because you didn't say so!!! I also didn't realise there was a question in it, let alone several questions; I just took it as being a diatribe or rantings of a frustrated old man throwing toys out of the cot which is pretty normal for you. You really, really need to articulate better. Now then - what is it you want to know??

Steve Taylor ● 262d

As said - repeat the questions Fishy and I'd be happy to look at them for you. Life moves on - I don't have the time or will to start trawling back to 5 June!!!

Steve Taylor ● 262d

Michael Brown - Mental.

Dick Greenleigh ● 262d

I was hoping I might get a more considered reply to my criticisms (at 19.45 on 5 June) of your facile account of the financial situation inherited by the Tories in 2010. Sadly, it's as if you never read any of the points I made, or, if you did, you failed to understand them. You merely keep on showering pigeon droppings. Your brain is not wired for rational debate.

Robert Fish ● 262d

“studiously ignored”.  Wow - How profound!!  Regarding finances - happy to answer intelligent questions if you care to repeat them.  Keep in mind the financial mess left by Labour.  Cue Liam Byrne note. Consider also that mess was so huge that austerity measures had to be imposed to get us out of the black hole. Consider also Martin Lewis rant that Labour is living in fairy-tale land and cannot possibly back up its presumptions.

Steve Taylor ● 262d

Oops!  My Bad. Thanks for spotting that Dickie.  Pedestrians of course.

Steve Taylor ● 262d

Reform may gain a few more points this morning as its broken in the last few hours that rishi left DD commemorations for an interview with ITV back here.What the heck was he thinking. He and his advisors have clearly lost the plot. This is definately a problem.

Julian Pavey ● 262d

I studiously ignored your question because it misrepresented my position, as is your wont. I never said I was opposed to the proposal. My only reservation went to motive. It looks like it's designed to rally troops in the alleged "war on motorists", and it certainly got you frothing.Now please address my criticism of your misrepresentation of the reason for the financial position inherited in 2010. No more jokes - serious answers only please.

Robert Fish ● 262d

"..the prosecution and incarceration of cyclists who kill or injure cyclists."Would that be the velomaniacs attacking the normal cyclists ?

Richard Greenhough ● 262d

“I note your selectivity in responding to posts”Oh hello Fish.  I note you still refuse to answer the question on why you don’t support the government initiative for the new law to enable the prosecution and incarceration of cyclists who kill or injure cyclists. Why is that? PS. You may wish to tell your new found bigot friend that I don’t read its posts.

Steve Taylor ● 262d

1. f4I’m thinking the feather spitters don’t actually know how to play

Russell Pearson ● 262d

While the pigeon struts remember that there is nothing that makes them feel more insecure than their opponent calmly continuing to play the regulation moves.

Paul Campbell ● 263d

I note your selectivity in responding to posts. Where you see an opportunity for an abusive response, you are quick to seize it. When serious questions are asked of you, there is no response. Do try to be more man and less pigeon.

Robert Fish ● 263d

“ Paul Campbell was absolutely right.”As predicted, the bigots only friend has spoken out and asserted himself as the loyal handbag carrier for his friend and hero.

Steve Taylor ● 263d

It has to be admitted Labour's silence on the EU is perplexing. They have to be looking very closely at what can be done to undo some of the unnecessary non-tariff barriers to trade as this is the main way they could quickly stimulate economic growth. Although the right wing press would cry Brexit betrayal, these policies would be pretty much universally popular even among Leavers who now recognise all the stuff about taking back control and sovereignty was so much guff. They would not in anyway contradict the result of the referendum even for those who are arguing it is still binding.The only explanation is that these matters are fiendishly complex and, even if the EU are enthusiastic about a greater degree of realignment, this might not be possible to achieve within the life of a single parliament therefore Labour are reluctant to promise something they can't deliver. Without the boost that smoother trade would provide, Labour will struggle to meet other election pledges on spending and keeping tax down. Their assumptions are that we will be the fastest growing economy in G7 and that has to include a boost from a more rational relationship with Europe.

Francis Rowe ● 263d

I started a poll on Chertsey FB discussion forum yesterday:https://www.facebook.com/share/eWic5nP55f11iW5J/

Michael Brown ● 263d

Latest YouGov poll has Reform on 17 and Conservatives on 19.Nigel is boxing up and tying a ribbon around the xenophobic vote and the Conservatives are panicking and tacking further to the right leaving Labour and Lib Dems to clean up the centre ground.

Paul Campbell ● 263d

“ . The Conservatives are talking about triple lock plus,”They aren’t just ‘talking about’ it. They have guaranteed to implement it immediately if they retain power. The Labour Party has guaranteed nothing on that front. They don’t have a plan.

Steve Taylor ● 263d

Whoever wins the election, there will be a need for further re-setting of the UK's relations with the EU. As someone who was a prominent Remoaner, it is worrying that Starmer is keeping very quiet on what his plans are in that area, making it seem likely that he knows they would lose him votes if he came clean. Don't forget that the Labour manifesto in 2005 promised a referendum before signing up to the Treaty of Lisbon, a promise that was subsequently broken. You just can't trust Labour.

Richard Greenhough ● 263d

Talking of ‘keeping quiet’ on Europe you may recall that the 2019 election was all about Brexit.  And the Tories did it.  They got Brexit done!  We are out of the E.U.  Now does it not strike you as odd that Sunak is not proudly reminding everyone of this ‘success’?  His silence on the matter is the clearest sign yet that even he  now recognises that all the extravagant promises spun by Johnson, Farage and co. were nonsense.  He knows that the tide of public opinion has changed now that we are living with the consequences.

Alastair Banton ● 263d

If he don't change his mind Robert, where is he on levelling up ?

Janice Evans ● 263d

I don't dispute pensioner poverty. I question your faith that the Tories will end it.

Robert Fish ● 263d

Janice, there is no evidence that Labour will end the triple lock. In an article in the Sunday Express as recently as 27th April, Starmer pledged that he would maintain the triple lock for at least five years.

Robert Fish ● 263d

Robert, the fact most pensioners are undernourished when taken into hospital says it all.

Janice Evans ● 263d

Robert, don't think so pensioners voted Conservative to get a near decentpension obviously utility bills has wiped that out.

Janice Evans ● 263d

Steve is gaslighting us on the state pension. It's just part of his campaign to discredit Labour. Neither of the main parties has said that they intend to end the triple lock. The Conservatives are talking about triple lock plus, i.e. indexing the tax free amount for pensioners. That could be better addressed as part of the reform of the tax-free allowance in general, and the termination of the freeze on the allowance, which has made many low-earning people subject to income tax.

Robert Fish ● 263d

"..there is hope ahead with the arrival of Remain."At the last election just four-and-a-half years ago, Starmer was all for remain, and seeking to find a way to frustrate the will of the electorate as expressed in the referendum, while campaigning for Corbyn to be Prime Minister. Now he has expelled Corbyn from the party he once led, and is keeping very quiet on what he wants to do regarding the UK's future relationship with the EU. His performance in the debate was unconvincing, and he notably failed to respond to Sunak's accusation that he was unwilling to spell out what he would do if he became PM. other than his spiteful taxing of private schools and reckoning a new Border Force would stop the small boat crossings (tried that, didn't work) and a new state-owned energy company (another chance for an inefficient public monopoly). Voting Labour and making Starmer prime minister is a leap into the unknown, and I suspect that if he does win the election, over the next five years a lot of people who voted Labour are going to wish they hadn't. If Labour is the answer, it must be a damn silly question.

Richard Greenhough ● 263d

I agree with Steve on single pensions, as some are just too poor to turnthe cooker on, that is not living.

Janice Evans ● 263d

More like seabird chess, with the birds going after the fish.

Richard Greenhough ● 263d

My uncle kept a pigeon called Kier. Kept getting lost and reversing its direction.

Russell Pearson ● 263d

Paul Campbell was absolutely right. It's pigeon chess. There are now droppings all over the board, and the puffed-up pigeon is convinced of its superior intellect!

Robert Fish ● 263d

Rishi did shout Truss down a bit so I never watched it, also never seeRishi v Starmer so cannot comment, but I would trust Rishi with the Country more than the others, however will wait to see how the voting progresses.

Janice Evans ● 263d

I missed the show, was it like Sunak was playing chess with our favourite feathered friend?

Russell Pearson ● 263d

Yes

Steve Taylor ● 263d

Is that how you feel 'debating' with members (not all) of this forum?!

Anne England ● 263d

“ Sunak was a civilised debater in parliament when first he succeeded Truss. But over time his PMQ performances have become more and more like Johnson's.”Can you not see or understand how frustrating it has been for Rishi. His superior intellect and intelligence isn’t challenged. Week after week he has had to put up with whining and whinging, really, really ridiculously stupid questions, from Starmer delivered in a whining, sermon like manner. The continual, and boring, blah, blah, blah about 14 years from Starmer ( all of)  which were not the responsibility of Rishi have frustrated him to no end. He is used to debating with people of equal intelligence so it’s little wonder he cannot remain calm when trying to debate with Starmer or anyone on the Labour front bench. And it’s not just Starmer he gets frustrated with. He was equally frustrated with the moronic utterances of Truss when they debated.

Steve Taylor ● 263d

Fruedian slip: When you say one thing and mean a mother.

Keith Iddon ● 263d

The American Psychological Association defines a Freudian slip as “an unconscious error or oversight in writing, speech, or action that is held to be caused by unacceptable impulses breaking through the ego's defenses and exposing the individual's true wishes or feelings”.

Alastair Banton ● 263d

‘On immigration especially, there is hope ahead with the arrival of Remain’

Alastair Banton ● 263d

There will be widows and widowers especially, who will suffer from Labour's dismissal of the state pension triple lock.Likewise, parents who choose to give their offspring private schooling will suffer from Labour's politics of envy by imposing 20% tax on them.Motormouth Wes Streeting's admirable plans to drastically reduce hospital waiting times is too ambitious to be true, and fools no one.Other than the points raised there is not a lot between the two main parties.Seeing what Liz Truss's attempt at unorthodoxy did to the economy, the Tories have played safe and like Labour, have morphed into a high tax, big state party. IOn immigration especially, there is hope ahead with the arrival of Remain. It is maybe too late in the day for them to gain enough momentum to get no more than two to three MPs elected.But with leader Farage's voice and presence heard loud and clear regularly in parliamentary sessions, change would come.Bring it on.

Denis Ian Fox ● 263d

You are playing chess with pigeons Robert. It's fun for a couple of moves and then the futility dawns.

Paul Campbell ● 264d

Are there no facts you will not distort or misrepresent in defence of your political fellow-travellers? It's amazing how the defenders of Tory honour are quick to cite the pandemic and the war in Ukraine as excuses for this governments' poor economic record, but conveniently ignore the banking crisis, and the fact that the substantial increase in national debt during the last three years of the Labour administration was the result of the operation to bail out the banks. The money was not 'squandered' - it was used to rescue the country from a grave financial crisis. The resulting increase in national debt was then the pretext for Osborne's disastrous austerity programme, supposedly intended to bring down debt as a percentage of GDP. And what was the level of debt in 2019, before the pandemic? Answer: 160.34% of GDP. And in 2009, the last full year of the Labour government? Answer: 123.64%. So all that pain, all that impoverishment over 10 years, and absolutely nothing to show for it in terms of reducing debt. The debt to GDP ratio was made worse, of course, by the reduction in growth caused by austerity - between 2010 and 2019 the average annual increase in GDP under Conservative administrations was 1.94%, compared with 2.85% under Labour in the ten years preceding the banking crisis.

Robert Fish ● 264d

Fair point, but Starmer is no Attlee and Labour is not as clear now in its principles or rhetoric as it was way back then.

Keith Iddon ● 264d

Attlee

David Burke ● 264d

Attlee

David Burke ● 264d

'Quiet decency' is all well and good and an honourable virtue,but who has heard of a successful,quiet politician?

Keith Iddon ● 264d

Mmmmm Starmers quiet decency or just total inability to answer questions or total inability to intelligently or forcibly / convincingly rebut? I think you may be confusing quite decency with lack of debating skills. With him and ALL in his shadow cabinet it’s all about criticism of the last 14 years but no effective or coherent plans for the future. It’s pathetic to blame Rishi for the last 14 years when he is trying to pick up the pieces from the Pandemic, the energy crisis, the Ukrainian war and of course the Truss destruction of the economy. But if you do indeed want to go back to 14 years blame game, let’s not forget what the Tories inherited from Labour when Liam Byrne left his famous note telling them not to look for any money!!!! It was all squandered!!! Nothing new, it’s what Labour do.

Steve Taylor ● 264d

Probably the best political interviewer there is.

David Burke ● 264d

“ Ironically, the only way now to bring the overall level of immigration down may be a return to some sort of freedom of movement with neighbouring countries.”Precisely. Agree 100%. And then we wouldn’t have to rely on immigration from third world countries and live with in hope that just some of the so called asylum seekers have some skills to contribute to our society rather than joining the social welfare system or slipping into the black economy or criminal underworld.

Steve Taylor ● 264d

I see Mishal Husain is due to moderate on Friday. Hopefully there'll be no more pigeon chess moves from Sunak.

Robert Fish ● 264d

Noticeable that no attempt has been made to address any of the questions raise but some lazy tropes have been recycled which don't really contribute much to our understanding.The problem here is that this is a complex issue that only charlatans and opportunists believe has easy solutions.Immigration can be at the same time be the cause and the answer to housing shortages, hospital waiting lists and an over-high tax burden. The main issue this country has at the moment is not too many people but too many people that are old and sick. The Tories solution has been to boost immigraton to record levels but they have done it in a panicked non-strategic way that may mean it is only a quick fix. Ironically, the only way now to bring the overall level of immigration down may be a return to some sort of freedom of movement with neighbouring countries. What is now apparent was that this meant previously that labour shortages were often met by people who came here to work but a large proportion of which would return to their native countries when opportunities presented themselves.

Mark Evans ● 264d

Debating skills - you must be joking! Sunak was a civilised debater in parliament when first he succeeded Truss. But over time his PMQ performances have become more and more like Johnson's. Never answer a tricky question, talk about something else, and preferably mount a personal attack on your opponent. Yesterday he barely gave a substantive reply to any question put to him. His overriding concern was to repeat ad nauseam the lie about a £2000 increase in every household's tax bill under Labour. I'll admit Starmer was a bit below par, and should have rebutted Sunak's charges more forcefully. But the contrast between Starmer's quiet decency and Sunak's unbridled bullying, mendacity and refusal to respect the rules of the debate or the moderator's authority (if that's the right word for someone so inadequate as Etchingham) meant that Sunak failed to clinch the victory he desperately needed to close the gulf between the parties. Taking a leaf out of the Trump copybook won't save him.

Robert Fish ● 264d

I am not saying Reform could do better.  I have no interest in Reform at all. Actually my only interest in reform is that I find Farage quite amusing and I admire his ability to put very stupid journalists down when they ask stupid questions. And most of them do ask embarrassingly stupid questions. I am merely saying that just about everything being discussed in the election campaign has an arterial link to Immigration so this whole election is in effect about immigration and that’s a subject where the Tories have a plan and Labour has absolutely NO plan and no targets. Yvette Cooper and Starmer have been dodging these questions for months.  The Tories have had clear plans for months which Labour keep on opposing / sabotaging!!

Steve Taylor ● 264d

So you think Reform could do any better, I'm not so sure.

Janice Evans ● 264d

Simply because he was moaning about other people not speaking English when so many 'foreigners' also speak English as well as one or more other languages.  There are some Brits who still think they just have to speak English LOUDER or m o r e    s l o w l y!!

Philippa Bond ● 264d

Although I'm British by blood, I wasn't born or brought up here - I wonder if that makes me an immigrant?

Davey Harris ● 264d

“ why vote on that alone.”Because all of those things are tied to increasing population which is due to immigration and don’t forget that many immigrants from 3rd world countries with patriarchal societies have no limits on the number of children they have, irrespective of whether they can afford to have them or not. The women have no say in deciding on how many children to have. Sad but true.

Steve Taylor ● 264d

'If I'd been Starmer I'd have been furious at her appealing to both "gentlemen", when only one was refusing to play by the rules.'Me too, she would start with Sunak asking for a response to a question, then ask Starmer to respond then go back to Sunak for another bite of the cherry, she did that so many times. When she should have alternated between them.

Vanessa Smith ● 264d

“  he was content to let Sunak hang himself.”Nonsense. He had no idea what would come out this morning and he simply couldn’t answer Rishi  because he had no defence at all. If he thought Rishi was wrong he should have manned up a bit and stated his case instead of squirming and looking like a frightened deer caught in the headlights. Rishi’s  Winchester College education  ensured that his debating skills were just too much for Stammer.  I also thought it was absolutely appalling that Starmer wouldn’t allow any family member to have private medical treatment for something serious. He puts his politics above the well-being of his family.

Steve Taylor ● 264d

Steve, you have to remember every Government have let us down onimmigration, none of them prepared for the amount of people arriving hereit wasn't fair on us or the immigrants.

Janice Evans ● 264d

Steve, yes it needs attention but as none of them seem able to deliver whyvote on that alone.

Janice Evans ● 264d

Or even 'utterly inadequate moderator"! Just noticed the slip. If I'd been Starmer I'd have been furious at her appealing to both "gentlemen", when only one was refusing to play by the rules.

Robert Fish ● 264d

I agree Etchingham was terrible - what they perhaps ought to consider is having a lectern with three lights - green you can speak, amber - you need to wind up - red - you get the microphone cut off, and give enough time for a reasonable answer. Sunak was just plain rude and arrogant, usual entitled Tory.

Vanessa Smith ● 264d

There were no winners in that dreadful debate last night. But the greatest losers were Sunak and Julie Etchingham. Sunak's answer to everything was the £2000 Labour tax-rise lie, and his behaviour was rude and overbearing, whilst Etchingham was an utterly inadequate mediator. She was quite incapable of stopping Sunak from hogging most of the debate time by his constant and prolonged shouting down of his opponent. As Starmer said, he couldn't get a word in edgeways. He was too polite to respond in kind to Sunak's newly-found and unconvincingly aggressive persona. Or perhaps, knowing what we all now know this morning, he was content to let Sunak hang himself.

Robert Fish ● 264d

“Not everyone votes on immigration problems.“Mmmm. But aren’t the problems interlinked? Growing population, NHS staffing, not enough schools, black economy not enough tax revenue, crime, sewage crisis - water companies can’t cope with increased sewage so it’s dumped in rivers and sea, not enough doctors etc etc etc. It’s all about the number of people who need to be catered for and tax receipts. The black economy and crime are now a massive problem in this country and public services can’t cope.

Steve Taylor ● 264d

If you don't think Labour would increase taxes, you haven't studied the party's history in government. Quite apart from their spiteful VAT attack on private schools, they don't seem to understand that abolishing the non-dom status will result in many currently enjoying it leaving the UK for more generous tax regimes, and in so doing, remove their contributions to the UK exchequer.

Richard Greenhough ● 264d

Well run along and do that then, if he deserves it.

Russell Pearson ● 264d

Starmer being the top lawyer that he is let Sunak hang himself by keep repeating the lie that Labour will increase taxes by £2000.This has been blown out of the water this morning by the Treasury office.

David Burke ● 264d

No Russell, Francis asked perfectly sensible questions that deserve to be answered thoughtfully.

Alastair Banton ● 264d

You’re not half wrong Frankie, but then you’re not half right either.

Russell Pearson ● 264d

not everyone votes on immigration problems.

Janice Evans ● 264d

Okay, let's just say we wake up on 5 July and Nigel Farage is Prime Minister. Can you explain to me how you will stop the boats? One policy you haven't mentioned that Reform are committed to is leaving the ECHR. This means that it will be impossible for us to have reciprocal returns agreements with any other country so for instance the very successful deal with Albania is torn up. That means that a small boat across the channel becomes a one way trip no matter where you come from. Of course you could resurrect or even expand the Rwanda scheme but that will only deal with hundreds of people whilst tens of thousands are coming over.As far as I can see, a Reform government would actually result in record levels of illegal immigration for the above reasons. Tell me why I am wrong.On capping legal immigration can you give more details of how this would work. Most of legal immigration comes from four sectors, the NHS, Social Care, construction and students.As the first three are driven by demand for labour and skill shortages how would you meet these needs if there was a cap? You can't say that they would be filled by people already here as that has already been shown to be a fallacy after Brexit when were told it was the solution.Can you explain how you would manage the NHS and the undoubtedly larger waiting lists that would result due to staff shortages? Can you explain how making worse the already critical shortages of people working in social care would not lead to a further decline in provision? Can you explain what percentage drop in construction sector activity would be acceptable as a result of there not being enough people with skills to complete projects?As far as I can see it a cap on immigration will lead to much longer hospital waiting lists, a significant decline in already inadequate social care standards and a sharp drop in construction starts hampering economic growth and housing starts making homes even more expensive. Tell me why I am wrong.

Francis Rowe ● 264d

You call it rude. I call it politics. Nobody wants a weak and wet leader like Stammer who sat on the fence over the Abbot saga. The man simply cannot make decisions.

Steve Taylor ● 264d

Rishi was incredibly rude during the first half with his near constant interruptions. They may both have been guilty to some extent but Rishi definitely 'won' on that score.

Anne England ● 264d

Philippa, yes most are but it's natural to want to protect your children anddon't know why they should be mentioned in any conversation.

Janice Evans ● 264d

Poor old Stammer. Rishi ran rings around him in the debate. Stammer just couldn’t get rid of his frightened deer in headlights look every time Rishi challenged him.  He was was out of his depth. No plans and no strategy.

Steve Taylor ● 264d

““ "Farage hangs around like a bad smell."So do Abbot and Truss

Steve Taylor ● 264d

Nigel is the least well disguised giant lizard of them all - it's all over his face!

Anne England ● 264d

Who is bank rolling him this time round?I thought it odd that when questioned on Radio 4 he didn't want to admit that his half-German children spoke ...German as well as English!  Lots of people are multilingual!

Philippa Bond ● 265d

Think Torys knew this was coming and could it possibly be the reason forearly election thinking Farage would not be prepared/ready which I don'tthink he was.

Janice Evans ● 265d

Surely everyone accepts that legal and managed immigration is good thing.It's the other sort that's the problem,and as it's covertly operated the problem it presents is growing in reality and in people's minds.

Keith Iddon ● 265d

Vote Tory.you know it makes sense.

James Dow ● 265d

Agreed - and if the various political pieces on the T.V. are anything to go by then immigration is about fourth on the list of things most people think are important and relevant to them. It certainly isn't in this house I can tell you, looking at a lot of programmes it seems to me we'd be right up sh*t creek without people who have immigrated here. What did surprise me is that housing is not further up the agenda.

Vanessa Smith ● 265d

Whatever ones feelings the man is popular with a large section of the country. Not enough to be in power but i think they are looking to do damage and look too 5 years time Look what hapened to reform in Canada and the Progressive Conservative Party in which they lost 167 seats of its 169. Thats why reform are looking and builing to the future. The way we are at the moment,itsdown to starmer and his crew because if the cock up big time reform uk could well be in power in the future. Only thing they have got to do is get talking about other policies and not just immigration.

Julian Pavey ● 265d

"Farage hangs around like a bad smell."So do Corbyn and Sturgeon. Isn't democracy wonderful !

Richard Greenhough ● 265d

I was in a TV series a few years back acting as a double for Rutger Hauer (RIP). He had dialogue asking if Farage had survived his plane crash? On hearing that he had his next line was, "What the hell was God thinking about".It got a laugh then but  I wonder what my/your reaction would be today.

Adrian Irving ● 265d

Farage hangs around like a bad smell.

David Burke ● 265d

He's baaaaack!

Chris Blackwell ● 265d

Sod off, and go to the US and help the lunatic Trump. My country hasn't gone anywhere as far as I can see, and all Farage is interested in is HIM.

Vanessa Smith ● 265d