Forum Topic

LTN Parliamentary debate

For anyone who still cares.https://ukparliament.shorthandstories.com/pet-ltns-survey/index.html?utm_source=petitioners&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=%5Bpet-ltns-survey%5D#I fear I've posted this too late , but no doubt "highlights" will become available.

Bruce Hammal ● 280d22 Comments

Oh really? That is actually funnier. Good luck proving that LTNs have made Wavendon Avenue a rat run. I'm full of anticipation for the logic on that one.

Paul Campbell ● 270d

She wanted to prove to the Council how LTNs have made her road into a rat run and should be removed but of course the Council as usual keeps its fingers firmly stuffed in ears.

Claire Moran ● 270d

Yeah probably just interested in getting some traffic data for her street for the fun of it. Pets > people.

Paul Campbell ● 271d

It doesn't unless you've gaslighting narcissist tendencies.

Mark Talbot ● 271d

Where does it say she is lobbying for an LTN?

Claire Moran ● 271d

And now one of the most vocal opponents of the cycle lane and LTNs is lobbying for a LTN on her road and announcing it on the OneChiswick FB page of all places. I am very happy to lend my support for a LTN between Dukes Avenue, Sutton Court Road and the A4.

Paul Campbell ● 271d

Interesting to see how the Overton window shifts so quickly and so far away from car saturated streets 

Paul Campbell ● 274d

Ruth Cadbury must really be regretting supporting LTNs and traffic chaos now that the General Election has been called. She seems out of touch with the reality of the situation and the traffic chaos caused for the overwhelming majority of her constituents.

Steve Taylor ● 275d

Show me the money.

Bruce Hammal ● 280d

Depends on your point of view and is (largely) irrelevant I think.Actions speak louder than words.In one year’s time, will any of the existing LTNs have been removed (spoiler some probably will) and will there be more LTNs then there are now?

Andrew Jones ● 280d

Theresa Villiers is 100% correct.

Steve Taylor ● 280d

v. quick scan because that is too boring even for me - I stand by my comment about right wingers and add that they are so far gone they will only ever give the oppo a thrown-in at the corner flag. Also looks like Chiswickians who want to suport the Labour view on this will support replacing the numerous old bollarded LTN schemes with ANPR to ensure access for disabled people. Supporters of the Beverely Road, Chiswick Common Road and Thornton Avenue LTN scheme (to name just a a few) are apparently anti-disabled and also anti-motorist because of all the fines that will inevitable be issued to innatentive drivers.

Paul Campbell ● 280d

Well, broadly they were anti, albeit unlike here the debate wasn't entirely polarised. Help yourself. I'd ignore Jacob Reese-Mogg's contribution though which was exactly the tripe you'd expect.https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2024-05-20/debates/676B0381-AC1E-4852-B5F3-C76F72CB1CFC/LowTrafficNeighbourhoods

Bruce Hammal ● 280d

what did they say?

Paul Campbell ● 280d

I'm not sure where that leaves Marsha de Cordova and Anneliese Dodds but I'm sure there'll  be an explanation.

Bruce Hammal ● 280d

Pull the other one. Viliers is there taking on the role of the apocalypse herald and channeling every ignorant Onesie in London"LTNs are an experiment which has failed. They are harming our economy, they are harming our capital city, they are punishing people just for trying to get around in a bus, or a car, or a taxi. I think it's time to halt the introduction of new LTNs. It's time for the government - and the minister - to intervene to start removing existing LTNs. This madness has to stop."There is plenty more where that came from. There is a point where you are so right wing you can't see round corners any more.

Paul Campbell ● 280d

Well, not quite, but never mind. The debating chamber was a bit of an LTN itself.

Bruce Hammal ● 280d

I imagine it was just like every LTN debate: opponents make up lots of imaginary reasons why they signal the apocalypse and are not popular with the the public and supporters explain with facts why they don't and are.

Paul Campbell ● 280d

It has been a good feisty debate Paul, with Chiswick taking a leading role and civility all round. You would have enjoyed it!

Bruce Hammal ● 280d

“More pressing subjects”Surely there must be some mistake as LTNs are well known to be the primary cause of climate change, pollution, businesses failing, loss of livelihoods, delays to A&E admissions and social injustice in the UK. Also they make some people’s private car journeys a bit more inconvenient.

Paul Campbell ● 280d

It's not in the main chamber, but is now showing on Youtube!

Bruce Hammal ● 280d

It's rather looking as if this debate has been bumped owing to rather more pressing subjects occupying the House today.

Bruce Hammal ● 280d