Forum Topic

The facts are that LTNs in general reduce total car journeys and pollution, make the streets safer for walking and cycling and vastly improve the lives of everybody living inside them and most living near them. PAUL - THIS IS SIMPLY NOT TRUE AND YOU KNOW THAT IT IS NOT TRUE. LTNSs SIMPLY MOVES THE AIR POLLUTION AROUND FROM ONE STREET TO A NEIGHBOURING STREET. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT WHERE LTNs HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED THAT THESE STREETS WERE NOT ALREADY SAFE TO WALK AND CYCLE. THERE WAS NO RISK ANALYSIS DONE.  BY DIVERTING TRAFFIC ON TO OTHER STREETS YOU HAVE BY YOUR ARGUMENT MADE THEM LESS SAFE. BRILLIANT - PURE GENIUS!Grove Park is a shining example of this. The Staveley Rd barrier has created a street that is just great for walking and cycling.you see it every day. What legacy have you left Chiswick after all your years as a Councillor.PAUL ANOTHER OUTRAGEOUS UNSUPPORTED CLAIM. STAVELEY ROAD WITH ITS WIDE VERGES AND PAVEMENTS WAS ALREADY A STREET THAT WAS GREAT FOR WALKING AND CYCLING. THERE HAS BEEN NO INCREASE IN CYCLING TO CHISWICK SCHOOL (ACCORDING TO THE SCHOOL).YOU ASK WHAT MY LEGACY AS A COUNCILLOR IS. I WOULD BE HAPPTY TO DISCUSS THIS WITH YOU OVER A PINT. WHAT READERS OF THIS BLOG WILL SEE IS THAT YOU HAVE LOST THE ARGUMENT AND HAVE DECIDED TO "ATTACK THE MAN AND NOT THE BALL". THIS IS A TECHNIQUE THAT YOU HAVE RESORTED TO ON MANY OCCASIONS AND I AM CALLING YOU OUT. I’m glad you acknowledge that no car is prevented from entering the Grove Park area.WHAT COLOUR ARE THE CLOUDS ON YOUR PLANET? I DID NOT SAY THAT. WHAT I DID SAY IS THE STAVELEY ROAD BARRIER (IT IS JUST NEWSPEAK TO CALL IT A FILTER) PERFORMS NO USEFUL FUNCTION IN KEEPING VEHICLES OUT OF THE AREA.Ludicrously short car journeys like Esmond Rd to the High Road do serve to highlight how unsympathetic the objectors to schemes long made permanent are.YOU REALLY DO NOT GET IT PAUL. IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT SHORT CAR JOURNEYS AND THAT MAKES YOU FEEL WARM AND COMFORTABLE THEN FINE. I AM TALKING ABOUT THE NORMAL DAY TO DAY CAR JOURNEYS THAT PEOPLE MAKE THAT HAVE BECOME MORE INCONVENIENT AND LONGER BECAUSE OF THE MEASURES THAT YOU SUPPORT. What makes you think the wheels are coming off the bandwagon? Our LTNs are permanent. The cycle lane is a great success and being extended through Brentford. More LTNs are being introduced and made permanent across London as their benefits become more apparent with time. Ealing is coming to the party again soon. The Hounslow Conservatives have proposed a motion to the Council asking them to use taxpayer money to subsidise cargo bikes for businesses, to reallocate car parking spaces to cargo bike parking and to plan for future cycle lanes to accommodate them. There are people who don’t get it but they are those like you clinging to an outdated notion of the unchallenged supremacy of the car in London. And they will suffer many more defeats before they wake up.NOTHING IN LIFE IS PERMANENT PAUL. I HAVE NOT CLUNG TO THE OUTDATED NOTION OF THE UNCHALLENGED SUPREMACY OF THE CAR. MY RECORD ON THIS AS AN ELECTED REPRSENTATIVE IS QUITE CLEAR. WHAT I AM IS A DEMOCRAT WHICH YOU QUITE CLEARLY ARE NOT. WHEN THE VASTE MAJORITY OF THOSE RESPONDING TO COUNCIL CONSULTATIONS ON THE CYCLEWAY/LTN SCHEMES REJECT THEM YOU STILL PLOUGH ON REGARDLESS. IF YOU ARE ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY THEN WE ARE IN FOR A GRIM TIME AS THE WISHES OF THE MAJORITY ARE IGNORED AND INDEED TRAMPLED UPON.

Sam Hearn ● 543d

Opposition to local transport initiatives from residents is nothing new.Trams never ran across Kew Bridge - the second (stone) bridge, built in the 1780s, was far too narrow, and very steep on the approach from Brentford - which meant that there was an isolated length of single track of 1.53 miles, with passing loops, from the south side of the bridge, across Kew Green, then south along the Kew Road to the Orange Tree public house 51°27′51″N 0°18′06″W / 51.464228°N 0.301534°W in Richmond. LUT made repeated attempts to cross Kew Bridge after it was rebuilt in 1903 but these continued to be resisted by the Richmond Corporation Tramways Committee. Kew Road residents opposed two attempts in 1897 & 1898 to install a second track - which would have necessitated road widening - and any subsequent electrification using unsightly overhead wires seemed out of the question, locals favouring the underground conduit system. Kew Observatory had concerns about the introduction of electric trams. So whilst the rest of London went electric, this little branch continued to use horse-drawn cars until well into the twentieth century - the interiors had red velvet seat cushions and were described as "comfortable, if not luxurious", and ran every quarter hour (the full "end to end" journey costing 2d) - until 20 April 1912 after which it was replaced by part of a London General (LGOC) motor-bus route. Richmond's tram-shed still exists as the former Shaftesbury Centre in Kew Road just north of the A316.

Andrew Jones ● 544d