Forum Topic

I haven't had a chance to ride on it yet but I did cycle along Kew Bridge Road and was very impressed with the quality of its construction.It throws into relief the design for cyclist to cross Kew Bridge where very little attempt has been made to accommodate them which is really frustrating because generally at this point people would want to head south rather than west.My attempts to persuade less willing family members to cycle to the Watermans rather than get the bus will be strengthened by this new cycleway. That said it was always the junction at Kew Bridge that less confident cyclists found intimidating and that remains as it was, the straight section along Kew Bridge Road was easily manageable.What I couldn't work out when I visited last week is whether the eastbound bus lane has gone to accommodate the cycleway has gone. If this is the case the journey times on buses needs to be monitored carefully. There are always queues at the Kew Bridge junction but the bus lane allowed the 237 and 267 to leapfrog them.Longer term it may be that the retention of this cycleway is dependent on western section of cycleway 9 being completed. At the moment it is a bit of a road to nowhere and I can't see it delivering a big boost to ridership. Cycling in the area is set to increase significantly because of huge population growth and many of the new developments being 'car free' but these new residents will also need reliable bus services so if this short section doesn't link up with cycleways in both directions it may be sacrificed.

Mark Evans ● 1073d

Anne England Although I’m not allowed on on cycle ways, I find the cycle road crossings at Kew Bridge and by the leisure centre a very helpful way to cross a busy road.TFL have change the way pedestrians cross at traffic lights by installing islands in the middle of the road, which you enter at one end, walk along the island and exit at the other end. I have one of the larger type class 3 scooters that cannot make the turn onto the pedestrian island. So crossing at traffic lights has been made very difficult if nearly impossible.So the newly install cycle crossing have made travelling around the area a lot safer for me and others similar to me.But I am breaking the Law by using these cycle  crossings or cycle lane, although I do try to avoid using cycle lanes, in fact I’m travelling a lot slower than a cyclist who overtake me with  grin on their faces than I am trading at 4 mph.I am waiting to be nicked as my scooter is fitted with number plates I am easy to trace through camera recognition and police patrol.What the Government says about Mobility ScootersDriving on footpaths and parkingAll mobility scooters and powered wheelchairs can legally travel at a maximum of 4mph on footpaths or in pedestrian areas.You cannot drive any type of mobility scooter or powered wheelchair on cycle paths marked ‘cycle only’.ParkingAll normal parking restrictions apply to mobility scooters and powered wheelchairs.Your vehicle should not be left on a footpath or pedestrian area on its own if it gets in the way of other pedestrians, including wheelchair users and people with prams or pushchairs.

Bernard Allen ● 1072d

Micheal, I really disagree with what you wrote there. I've lived in Antwerp - which I will admit it being in the Flanders, but that's almost Netherlands - and if I take my own commute the only bit of bi-directional bike lane was a bit on Beatrijslaan but that's because... there were two lanes on either side of the boulevard.I started off on Van Eyk - with two lanes on either side of the road - then turned right on Frankrijklei - again, two lanes on either side of the boulevard. Then left on Leysstraat, which is pedestrianised and hence a free-for-all, though somehow people survived. Under the Scheld on the bike-and-pedestrians only tunnel, then on towards Kruibeke where my office was. Even on widely suburban roads like the one below, the lanes were on both sides.https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.2035396,4.317748,3a,75y,191h,84.09t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sh1PCz1rA6MbyEfBbfvPlRA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3Dh1PCz1rA6MbyEfBbfvPlRA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D74.78645%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttuI can give you my commute in Copenhagen: same thing. Or my ride track from Dunkerque to Oudenaarde in Belgium: as above. I'm not one of the velophobes you read on this forum; I love cycling, I love doing it, and I want to do it safely. I don't claim I could've done a better job than the designers who have worked on this, I'm not an expert... But I can't help but feeling the way I do, and I hope future iterations of projects in London can be made better.

Francis Sheehan ● 1067d

Anti-cycling playbook neatly displayed on this thread:There isn't enough space for cycling.A cycle lane will take space from the carriageway and pavement so it shouldn't be allowed.Private car drivers who haven't been on a bus for decades are certain that the cycle lane is a travesty of justice for bus users.Cyclists are a minority so they shouldn't get any safe space.Nobody will cycle in the winter or the rain so we shouldn't build cycle lanes.This new cycle lane stops somewhere so it is clearly pointless and we should stop building it. People who support cycle lanes are dangerous zealots out to destroy normal people's lives.What about the elderly and disabled?The authorities know that cycle lanes are subversive so they are trying to hide the evidence despite running a public consultation on this cycle lane extension from Kew Bridge to Brentford.There are at least a thousand causes more deserving of investment than cycling.Cyclists are getting everything and all the money and all the space and everything and it is sooooooo unfair on motorists.Cyclists drive so they shouldn't want cycle lanes and they certainly shouldn't get them.Something about Europe and bidirectional ...... something something.Cyclists will still use roads when there are cycle lanes so there shouldn't be cycle lanes.Cyclists are the most danegerous people on the roads if not the planet so there shouldn't be cycle lanes.I cycled for 150 years on the roads and only ever had friendly exchanges with polite motorists who went out of their way to bid me good day so anybody asking for cycle lanes is a coward. SHARE THE ROADS.

Paul Campbell ● 1066d

This was briefly mentioned in the thread by someone saying that the road wasn't wide enough and Michael Robinson said prove it.That got me thinking about how wide a road would need to be for a bidirectional cycle lane to be accommodated safely.The road has buses going both ways.  A London double decker bus is 8'4" wide (or 100" thereby combining both imperial measures and a metric base 10!) but it is unclear from what I can find whether that includes or excludes wing mirrors.If the dimensions do not include wing mirrors then the bus from wing mirror to wing mirror will be c.10' wide.In very simplistic terms a road can have a bidirectional cycle lane if the width of the cycle lane + 2 bus widths (and a little bit to allow for them to pass safely) + the width of a pedestrian island is less than the width of the road - of course that does not leave room for bus stops but we will deal with that later.Taking the design of C9 as our best example of a bidirectional cycle lane that would be anything from 7' to 9' wide depending on how much space you have for the separation between cycle lane and the rest of the road.A pedestrian island is c.3' wideSimple maths gives us a minimum road width of 28-30' if the bus dimensions include wing mirrors and 18-24" wider if they do not.Because even a floating bus stop will be 1-2' wider than a pedestrian island for safety reasons, if the stretch of road needs a bus stop then it would be sensible to add another couple of feet to the minimum road width.So in very simplistic terms a road which is under 30' wide cannot accommodate a bidirectional cycle lane safely and the minimum might even be closer to 35' wide if bus wing mirrors are not included in bus width dimensions and the safety buffer that needs to be built in to any design is larger than I have guessed.As a quick guide I did a simple measurement by pacing of CHR and it is between 35' and 40' wide at the place I measured.

Justin Stephenson ● 1065d