Forum Topic

The name Old Market Place is a nod to the area's history and a bit of positive rebranding which can only help attract more people to the area. The alternative name of 'the car park in front of the shut police station' doesn't quite have the same ring to it.On the issue of parking, it doesn't seem to me like the Flower Market deliberately set out to reduce the amount of spaces (apart of course from on the days that they operate). The original proposals saw a reduction  but only because more recent regulations required spaces to be wider.What isn't clear is why there has been such a big reduction in the second design. A lot of weight seems to have been given to the majority of people surveyed apparently being against parking provision at the site but as responses were collected during the markets while people who would normally drive to shop wouldn't be there, we can't conclude this was representative.The proposed drop in spaces is much more material particularly when you take into account those set aside for EV charging. In addition, the situation still isn't clear about what is happening going forward with Sainsbury's. Combined these two measures would result in a massive reduction in available parking in Chiswick. Some people will argue that this is a positive but, if that is the direction we are going it might be wise to do some analysis first on what the impact is likely to be. Generally people seemed happy that Steer did a good job with its analysis of the council's Covid traffic measures, so the firm could be asked to produce a report before any irrevocable changes are made.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 1081d

I was given some background information on the history of markets in Chiswick which, I understand, was based on information from the Chiswick Times and Chiswick library. This is a very potted summary. There was a market in what is now the car park for around six or seven years between the wars. It was set up in August 1919 in response to the price of food. By late February 1920 it had become problematical and, while there were arguments in favour of it, the local chamber of commerce wanted it to be enclosed. It was a key issue in a by-election in 1922 which was won by the candidate who championed the open market. In 1923 there was a public meeting which favoured the market. In 1924 Chiswick District Council was concerned that the cost of cleaning up after market holders was almost the same as the council's income from the stall holders. There were differences of opinion between the council, which favoured the market, and an owner occupier who described it as a motley shambles; it was said that rich local inhabitants were moving out due to "the tumult and crowded condition of the High Road" and that "we should be jealous of the character and tone of our parish and more especially of the High Road". There were concerns about its impact on local property values. A local poll in the same year resulted in a big majority in favour and it was decided that Chiswick would have a permanent market and that the rents should be high enough so as not to undercut shopkeepers. It was moved indoors (to where the closed police station is) and ultimately failed.

Joanna Biddolph ● 1080d

"Before plans are made to radically change the parking situation surely it would be a good idea to have some research into who is parking, why they are parking there and for how long?"I agree.  Which is why, one Saturday in February this year, I spent two hours asking drivers as they were leaving the car park how much they had spent, and on what, while they were parked in the car park. Several said they had parked elsewhere first and wanted to tell me their total spend here but I only wanted to know what they had bought while parked in the car park. The weather was mild. It was half term when many Chiswick residents go away; Ireland was playing against France at rugby with many watching indoors, so Chiswick was much less busy than usual. Parking enforcement officers were on strike and several drivers parked for longer than the maximum two hours, assuming they wouldn’t be fined. The result was a lower turnover of spaces and, therefore, a lower spend per hour. It was more interesting than I was expecting, revealing not just how much was spent but also who was parking there and where they had come from.  It was an impromptu snapshot, not a formal survey that followed Market Research Society guidelines. After publishing it, several people said that the average of £268 per car was wrong and that I should disregard the highest and lowest spends (£6,500 on kitchen equipment and £1,000 on an antique desk - and £1.50 on a small present for a sick child in hospital and £3 on a greetings card).  Whether the hourly calculation is right or wrong, knowing what drivers had bought was a fascinating reminder of the variety we have (and there was no mention of other possible purchases such as a diamond ring or painting which could have been at the top end of the spend) and the total reported to me during those two hours was £12,329. Two points were especially worth noting.  Of the 46 drivers I interviewed (10 refused to speak to me), only eight were from within Chiswick. The others came from Acton, Ashford, Brook Green, Buckinghamshire, Camberley, Colindale, Dorking, Ealing, East Acton, East Sheen, Epsom, Greenford, Hammersmith, Heathrow, Henley, Hillingdon, Isleworth, Kew, Marylebone, Osterley, Queen's Park, Ravenscourt Park, Sandhurst, Shepherd's Bush, Twickenham, Wembley. Chiswick is undoubtedly a retail and hospitality destination. The full survey is here: https://www.chiswickgunnersburyconservatives.org.uk/news/survey-shows-economic-value-chiswicks-central-car-park-and-where-customers-come

Joanna Biddolph ● 1080d

You told me that it was impossible to reduce parking spaces because so few exist so it isn't unreasonable to assume that is one of the reasons you have been 'forced to go elsewhere'.The reality is that there has been very little change overall in the number of parking spaces over the last few years and, for anyone with local knowledge it has actually become easier to park.The two car parks - the one at Old Market Place and the Sainsbury's one are not as full as they used to be because they have become less accessible as has been highlighted in this thread. If Anita is right about the barriers at Sainsbury's what has changed over the last few years is that Chiswick now has unlimited free parking at its centre.As for closing roads, this has simply not happened in the centre of Chiswick other than at Fishers Lane which does appear to be problematic but, as I understand it, doesn't directly affect you. The only other change has been the removal of the right turn out of Duke Road which most people seem to agree was a sensible measure to reduce risk at the Fishers Lane junction.'The ridiculously inappropriate, hellishly expensive cycle lane' was initiated by Boris Johnson and pushed through by his nominee Andrew Gilligan. The local 'cycle lobby' might have cheered this on but their influence in making it happen was probably zero.Do I think the changes have improved Chiswick overall? No, seems to be far more queueing traffic around the centre of Chiswick than there ever used to be. However, the notion that this doesn't make it a pleasant place to visit and shop is a nonsense.

Francis Rowe ● 1077d