Forum Topic

Your solution of physically intimidating a child you suspect might be about to rob you isn't really practical as an overall solution to this issue.Although Covid distorts things, the figures suggest that crime was declining until falling police numbers inevitably led to it rising again. However, new recruitment should help start the amount of crime fall again. Personally I feel very safe on local streets at night and more so than I did ten to fifteen years ago.One thing that is less clear is the trend in child on child crime. As I understand it this isn't properly captured in the statistics published by the Met. The chances are that this is driven by how expensive and insecure devices carried by children are at any given time. It used to be the case that juvenile robbers in west London used to descend on King Street on the first day of school after Christmas to take phones given as presents from pupils at Latymer School. I'd assume that since the advent of Find My Phone and greater security on mobile devices, the prevalence of this crime will have fallen but I have a limit grasp of what can be done with a stolen phone these days.On operational matters, aren't these best left to the professionals? It strikes me that a flaw in the armchair coppers' idea of 'more visible policing' is that if criminals can see where the police are they will just go and offend where they aren't. Whenever I have seen a gang of young scumbags getting collared there has been an unmarked car involved in making the arrest. Invisible policing seems to be much more effective.

Francis Rowe ● 1164d