Nigel, as you didn’t actually look at the link to check if it confirmed your prejudices, here is the abstract of the paper:Evaluation of low traffic neighbourhood (LTN) impacts on NO2 and trafficXiuleng Yang a, Emma McCoy a,b, Katherine Hough c, Audrey de Nazelle c,d,a Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdomb Department of Statistics, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom c Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdomd MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomTraffic restriction measures may create safer and healthier places for community members but may also displace traffic and air pollution to surrounding streets. Effective urban planning depends on understanding the magnitude of changes resulting from policy measures, both within and surrounding intervention areas; these are largely unstudied in the case of Low traffic Neighbourhoods (LTN). We evaluated impacts of three LTNs in the London Borough of Islington, UK, on air pollution and traffic flows in and around intervention areas, based on monthly Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) and traffic volume data provided by the local authority. We identified pre- and post-intervention monitoring periods and intervention, boundary and control sites. We then adapted the generalised difference in differences approach to evaluate the effects within LTNs and at their boundary. We found that LTNs have the potential to substantially reduce air pollution and traffic in target areas, without increasing air pollution or traffic volumes in surrounding streets. These results provide sound arguments in favour of LTNs to promote health and wellbeing in urban communities.
Tom Pike ● 1212d