Forum Topic

That’s as maybe but then isn’t it always the case that the wealthiest consume most? Flying, driving, etc, etc.But there is a lot of wealth in rural areas, such as the Cotswolds where many have second homes with just a Range Rover or Ferrari parked in the garage. Maybe that mileage was then travelling from Town to the country estate regularly.The problem with you, or anybody, trying to decide what constitutes an essential journey is that everyone’s concept is different. Society isn’t homogeneous enough to neatly fit us all into one category. It’s why trying to ‘re-educate’ people with the constant mantra of cars are bad is simply not workable. The genie is out of the bottle with personal transport. It will eventually be electric, apparently, which reduces pollution massively so that strand of your argument disappears (and please don’t start all that particulate nonsense).Active travel is a misnomer. There’s just travel by whatever means is most appropriate. Sure, there are times when not taking the car would be better, but then there are times when not having a Macdonalds delivered to your door would also be better. Or getting that all important Amazon delivery. You get the drift. Humans tend to be inherently lazy, the so-called principle of least effort. Very difficult, if not impossible, to change that.I’d add that economic factors play a big part in human behaviour. Perhaps car use will diminish as the cost of living escalates, although in leafy Chiswick it may not be such a blow.

Simon Hayes ● 1438d

The cyclists go very quiet when proven wrong. Non response is the next stage after deflection in the LCC playbook (and it really does exist. They were foolish enough to leave the webpage up long enough for many of us to see it).Guy Lambert is, of course, a hypocrite. He’s in the LCC and supports the closure of roads in Brentford because that’s what his mates want, even if the majority of residents don’t. He cycles about but likes to pootle around in an ancient and polluting car too. And given his girth he’s not really selling ‘active travel’ as an answer to anything.The unlovely car park in Brentford is a curious thing. Built without planning permission on the main drag through the town in ugly concrete, which as everyone knows by now has a huge carbon footprint. It was erected because Ballymore, who now run Brentford, wanted it to ensure they could attract sufficient buyers for its ludicrously expensive flats by the river. Hard to sell to those millionaires if they can’t park the Ferrari somewhere.Of course Lambert and co could have demanded it be pulled down since it a big old car park doesn’t fit with Hounslow council’s vigorous green agenda. But no, retrospective planning permission was granted. No sanction, no reprimand, just quietly let it slip past. But they did see it painted with piss poor artwork just so everybody could spot their folly.But of course, the ordinary residents who own cars get punished, since their council tax and permit payments aren’t as valuable as the cash from good old Ballymore. I do wonder how much of that goes into little brown envelopes around there....?!

Simon Hayes ● 1437d

Tom, this is where you start to struggle. I keep trying to find some common cause. Then you say 'retail and parking are becoming increasingly decoupled'. What does that mean? Sure there some fewer spaces in Hammersmith but there are still a lot, was it ever full before and is it now? There is a new multistorey in Brentford. And lets not forget the massive car parks that sit around Westfield and are used by commuters as well as shoppers. The public transport to Hammersmith is excellent, with step free access to its two stations, whereas Chiswick has none. Maybe you can join the campaing to address that? I would like less cars, pollution and congestion, But how do we get there whilst accomodating those that legimately need a vehicle plus trade and other journeys. We dont really know how many people travel to Chiswick flower market by car, there are still plenty of options for parking and Sunday parking (which personally think is a bad idea and dangerous) means parking in central W4 goes up. I agree getting more there by public transport or indeed 'active travel' would be good, so maybe we can stop losing key stretches of bus lane?Bland generalisastions dont mean anything. You dont seem to want to oppose the giant multistorey in Brentford nor that Chiwick business park encourage hundreds of vehicles into W4 every matchday. Why? Personally I think Brentford should be supporting car free travel, given the mass of local transport options, perhaps with shuttle services to parking further out. A 'park and ride' if you like. Can you support that?

Bill George ● 1437d

Oxford is hardly a siginifier for Chiswick and the latter's traffic problems.Basically it is a small(ish) medieval city, which is experiencing severe growth problems from tourism, University expansion, commerce and industry etc. Which in turn has contributed to it having one of the fastest growing populations in the UK, now the 5th most densely populated Local Authority in the South East of England. Naturally this has pushed house prices well above the national average.Yet it cannot expand outwards as most such cities would normally do, since it is completey surrounded by Green Belt - or the "Green Noose", as locals have dubbed it.Which means traffic in the city itself is ever more congested, while with so many of the working population forced to live outside the city and beyond the Green Belt, it suffers extremely high levels of commuter traffic in and out.This latter is so extensive, that they have been forced to introduce several Park-and-Rise schemes in mitigation, for drivers to park up well outsiode the city and continue their journey by traoin, coach or bus.Of course, although Oxford's particular circumstances are rather different from Chiswick's, when it comes to mindsets, there is one similarity. Namely, the severe congestion and pollution in the city itself is leading to increased conflict between local residents who are demanding LTN's, and car drivers who are opposing them.Which last point is possibly the only similarity between Chiswick and Oxford.

Richard Cathcart ● 1429d