Forum Topic

Comparisons of figures on COVID deaths between countries need to be taken with a very large bucket of salt, for at least the following reasons:- Countries uses different methodologies for counting COVID deaths (with COVID, of COVID, mentioned on death certificate in any form; within X days of testing positive (regardless of cause);  date of death or date of registration etc., etc.)- Misdiagnosis of COVID as something else and vice versa- Not all countries' reporting systems are robust at the best of times. (The UN estimates that, in “normal” times, only two-thirds of countries register at least 90% of all deaths that occur, and some countries register less than 50% — or even under 10% — of deaths).  In the pandemic, these may have broken down further or been deliberately distorted.- Different countries have different age profiles.  We know that death rates amongst the old are higher than amongst the young - so given the same age group death rates in two different countries, the country with an older age profile will have a greater overall death rate.Given all that, arguably a better way of looking at comparative overall impacts of COVID in different countries is to look at excess death rates - i.e. the number of deaths recorded in a given period above the "expected" number of deaths in that period (usually the average of deaths recorded in the same period over the past 5 years).  And even this will be prone to some of the problems set out above (reporting systems, age profiles).  And this approach has its own issues (is the baseline of "expected" deaths measured over a rolling 5-year period, over a fixed 5-year period, using regression analysis etc.), all of which may give different results.In both cases, the time period that you are looking at will also affect the figures.  As a simple example, if you look at a two year period, if deaths are brought forward from year 2 to year 1, then looking at just year 1 will give a higher death rate than looking at year 1 and year 2 together.Given all of this, unless (or even if) you are an expert in epidemiological statistics, a league table of COVID deaths is not really terribly enlightening - I suspect that people will pick and choose the statistic that suits their prior convictions - I've seen a statistic which (if I've understood it correctly!) gives the UK one of the best excess death rates in the world.

Andrzej Kowalski ● 1547d

What a thoroughly wrong-headed analysis of the reasons why so many people think Johnson must go! For me, as a remainer, Brexit is not per se a reason for getting rid of him. It's just one, and by no means the worst, of what you so lightly dismiss as mere "peccadillos". The list of his transgressions is endless. It's not just the flagrant flouting of the Covid Regulations that his government introduced, or the lying to parliament about it - it's also the unlawful proroguing of parliament, the cronyism, the corruption, the attempted overhaul of the parliamentary standards regime to get Owen Patterson off the hook (just one of many challenges to independent regulation of MPs and Ministers). Then there's the unprecedented overriding of recommendations of the House of Lords Appointments Commission as regards the propriety of his nominees, the attempt to increase control over the independent Electoral Commission, and the threat to change unilaterally the NI Protocol, which would be a disgraceful breach of International Law. These are not peccadillos - they are the constant manifestation of a Prime Minsiter who has absolutely no morals. He can be forgiven for screwing us over Brexit, and for the lies he told in the process, but there can be no forgiveness for his dangerous autocratic tendencies and his utter lack of respect for the Rule of Law. He is both national threat and national disgrace.As for a Starmer-led alliance threatening the unity of the UK, what could be more designed to throw NI into the arms of the Republic than Johnson's pandering to the DUP, and his indifference to the possibility of a resumption of the troubles if a hard border is re-established between NI and the Republic? All this talk about protecting the Good Friday Agreement is insincere government cant. What they're doing is likely to have the opposite effect. And as for Starmer, I wonder if he'll be so keen to embrace the idea of Scottish independence, given that it would most likely deliver a regular Tory majority in England.

Robert Fish ● 1547d