Forum Topic

I asked the Labour Party and the Conservative Party identical questions over a week ago. Despite reminders, the Labour Party has not bothered to respond!!Hereunder extract extracts from the Conservative response."The current Labour administration, has been failing us, from year-on-year council tax rises being used to fund huge increases in councillor allowances, to making unilateral decisions on traffic schemes in our borough without properly consulting with residents. In contrast, when the council was run by the Conservatives between 2006 and 2010, we froze council tax every single year. We doubled recycling rates, invested millions into modernising our libraries and leisure centres and built safer communities by working with residents and the police to tackle crime across the borough.I note from your email below you are concerned about road closures and changes to road systems without proper consultation. We want to put residents at the heart of local decision making by increasing the number of public forums, this will ensure residents are actively involved in decision making and actively consulted. On the issue of cycle lanes, we will work with local residents and community groups to review current and proposed extensions to ensure we build safer cycling infrastructure that works for the community. On the two points below, we are happy to review and work with local residents and community if elected on May 5th. I note your concern and frustrations with the low traffic neighbourhood schemes (LTN), frustrations that are also shared by myself and my colleagues. We will review Hounslow Labour’s divisive and poorly implemented LTN schemes to ensure residents are properly consulted about the changes to roads in their area, with schemes reformed in areas in which they are not working.Similarly, we pledge to commission a boroughwide survey of the backlog in maintenance works – We will ensure residents have clear and up to date data on works being carried out by Hounslow Council and how long it takes for road repairs to be complete. On the issue of fly-tipping. There is no doubt there has been a significant increase in fly-tipping since the councils introduction of fortnightly waste collection. Fly-tipping is not only limited to large household items, but we are seeing greater instances of normal household waste being disposed in public areas. To address this, we will reinstate weekly rubbish collections in addition to the already weekly recycling collections, and work to improve our borough’s stagnant recycling rate by introducing recycling for residents of flats above shops. But to further tackle the issue, we will work with the police to encourage the recruitment of more local special constables to increase the number of police on the streets to tackle antisocial behaviour and crime, including stronger action against those that fly-tip."

Steve Taylor ● 1618d

Did you read the Chiswick Calendar article? Councillor Biddolph's comments have won her new critics: the accusation of "dog-whistle racism" was made by a resident of Hounslow; her incorrect characterisation of those in the west of the borough failing to engage in keeping their environment clean has been disputed by those who are leading efforts to do just that. Councillor Biddolph was factually incorrect to claim that residents in the west of the borough were less likely to report fly tipping or graffiti and "therefore live in very different circumstances". She has subsequently doubled down on emphasising what she regards as the divisions within the Borough: “If the Hounslow Labour Party genuinely believes that the issues affecting Chiswick are the same as the issues affecting residents in the west of Hounslow, then that is further proof that their councillors simply do not understand our borough."If the issues affecting Chiswick are so different, it must surprise Councillor Biddolph that not one of the Conservatives manifesto's ten key commitments makes any distinction between Chiswick and the rest of the Borough. Maybe the rest of her local party don't understand the Borough either. Or maybe they recognise that the most important issues, clean streets, an improved environment, a safer Borough, support for the local economy, are recognised across the Borough and even across the political divide. There is always more that unites us than separates us, but Councillor Biddolph has chosen to emphasise the latter.On the point where we both agree, there has also been no attempt by Councillor Biddolph to correct the record regarding her scaremongering comments over TGT.

Tom Pike ● 1614d

It pains me to say it Tom but whenever you make a claim based on data, if I have the time to check it, I often found you have carefully selected the numbers to support your argument rather than to give a true representation of the facts.I stand to be corrected if I had a chance to have a look at a full set of data from FixMyStreet but without that I can’t accept that the numbers you have given prove anything as their source seems to be a partisan one.There is on the other hand a significant body of academic research that confirms the concerns that Cllr Biddolph has raised. Online civic engagement platforms do a lot of good but it is generally recognised that they have an inherent socio-economic and ethnic bias that needs to be accounted for. Ironically, in raising this point Cllr Biddolph is representing the interest of people in the west of the borough and the people slandering her as a racist are working against the best interests of these residents. You need to read “FixMyStreet Brussels: Socio-Demographic Inequality in Crowdsourced Civic Participation by Burak Pak, Alvin Chua  and Andrew Vande Moere” which was published in the Journal of Urban Technology.https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1708/1708.02274.pdfThey conclude, “Our analysis, based on a case study situated in Brussels led to several statistically significant findings that suggest that web-based civic participation platforms tend to marginalize citizens of certain ethnicities as well as those with lower incomes.“Though our findings were specific to Brussels, much of what we found sheds light onto the subject of socio-demographic inequality on web-based civic participation platforms.”Lots of other research that reaches similar conclusions is referred to in the paper. For instance they say, “Results of another study conducted in the United Kingdom (Gibson et al., 2014) indicated that participants from various education levels were equally represented on the platform, though a majority of these participants were white. The number was drastically low when compared to official census data. Only 2 percent of the participants on FMS were determined to be ethnic minorities whereas the actual figure should have been 13 percent. Accordingly, comparison to other crowdsourcing platforms revealed that FMS is specifically prone to demographic bias.”I would be fairly confident in saying that these findings would be replicated by any serious analysis of data for the London Borough of Hounslow and confirm Cllr Biddolph’s view. The irony is that denying the truth of what she is saying means that there is a danger that council resources would be over allocated to the Chiswick area. She is actually arguing for fairness to other residents of the borough that she doesn’t represent. W4 residents recent conducted a very successful campaign to get redundant street furniture removed which has made a significant difference to the area – should areas where such campaigns are not initiated be left to deteriorate?Although you could argue that Cllr Biddolph partly deserves to be the victim of this baseless slur against her because she has recently done the same to her opponents with false claims about the redevelopment of Turnham Green Terrace, that is a very unproductive road to go down.She almost definitely won’t get re-elected on 5 May for reasons which have nothing to do with any of these issues but because a large number of people in Chiswick Gunnersbury will want to send a message that Boris Johnson should not be our Prime Minister.Given the diligence and hard work of Cllr Biddolph as well as Cllr Mushiso and Cllr Gill, a lot of people with all kinds of political views who haven't completely lost a sense of perspective, will recognise the unfairness of this outcome. The concern that I would have is that anyone considering becoming a councillor will look at these circumstances and see the slurs that Cllr Biddolph is being subjected to and decide it simply isn’t worth it. I hope the new councillors will not be subject to the same kind of malicious attacks but I very much doubt it – it will just be a different set of people doing it.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 1611d

I used and championed FMS for years before it was adopted by Hounslow.  I found it far easier to use than Council website reporting sites which had far too many clunky pages to negotiate and seemed far more interested in who you are than what the problem was.  I know that other parts of the borough have or have had community champions too.I actually wondered initially whether there was a deliberate attempt to make it more difficult to report problems.  Since Ealing stopped using it I don't think I have bothered once to report anything.  I didn't have a mobile phone and all this app business was a bridge too far.  I also suspect that the original FMS also showed where the repeated problems were -  the knowledge of which was not appreciated by everyone especially landlords.  It is true that mobile phone photos can more accurately show and describe flytipping and graffiti and broken paving and kerb stones etc to those needing to organise the fixing.  Being able to drop pins to show where something is when you don't know all the road names is very useful.However repeated education on how items should be disposed of is essential particularly now that we are working towards a more circular economy using our waste as resource.  People move home, items change in make-up and systems of disposal change.  Most of us now know that it isn't a good idea to just dump our waste in someone else's backyard polluting their environment as we all share so much of it.  It is imperative that flytipping is investigated so that change can happen. There are often CCTV cameras to help.Community pride in a better environment helps a lot.  It can be very satisfying joining in to do this in a litterpick and you meet likeminded people!  The only people  I've met outside sweeping their bit of street have been foreigners -  and you can include those working at The Roebuck in that number too!

Philippa Bond ● 1611d

Maybe you would like to give a concrete example of what you suppose is selection bias rather than just assert it.I'm surprised you didn't look directly at the number or reports on FixMyStreet before launching into a lengthy exposition. If you did you would have been able to directly confirm for yourself by selecting the borough and the report categories that your conclusions and Councillor Biddolph's assertions are both simply not correct:https://www.fixmystreet.com/around?lat=51.4675&lon=-0.36167&js=1&zoom=0&filter_category=Fly%20tipping,Fly%20tipping%20-%20Enforcement%20Request,Graffiti%20%2F%20Flyposting%20(non-offensive),Graffiti%20%2F%20Flyposting%20(offensive)&status=open&sort=created-descInstead you are exercising a logical fallacy by arguing from the general to the particular and hence claiming that this proves the slurs against her are false. It is logically no different to telling me that because most people don't have red hair, someone must be lying if they tell you they have red hair! It is quite clear that Councillor Biddolph incorrectly asserted that people in the west of the Borough are disengaged and live in very different circumstances to Chiswick, along rubbish-strewn and graffitied streets, because of their failure to routinely report everyday issues (fly tipping, graffiti, dumped or out of control waste).She further incorrectly asserted that the number of residents in the west of the Borough who can’t speak English helps explain this failure and their resultant degraded living circumstances.For some reason you feel it necessary to obfuscate the issue when most people are able to derive their own opinion based on a proper understanding of the facts.

Tom Pike ● 1611d

4/24/2022 11:36:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:  LTNs.  DON’T AGREE 4/24/2022 11:35:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:re LTNs - Don't agree 4/24/2022 11:33:00 AM Julie CarterRe:re LTNs - Don't agree 4/24/2022 11:32:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Anyone up for spoiling their local election ballots? 4/14/2022 4:22:00 PM Julie CarterRe:anyone up for spoiling their local election ballots? 4/14/2022 7:33:00 AM Julie CarterWhat is the most pressing issue of importance to Chiswick residents 3/1/2022 10:18:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Congratulations to Chiswick School! 5/22/2021 10:03:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Barclays Chiswick branch closing... 5/22/2021 9:59:00 PM Julie CarterRe:A Simple Cycleway Solution 5/1/2021 1:28:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Now pedestrians not welcome ! 5/1/2021 1:21:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Cyclists please be have some respect 5/1/2021 1:08:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Plant trees 4/25/2021 11:57:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Plant trees 4/25/2021 10:13:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/24/2021 11:23:00 AM Julie CarterPlant trees 4/24/2021 11:21:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/23/2021 6:46:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/23/2021 6:45:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/20/2021 8:42:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/20/2021 5:27:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/20/2021 2:43:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/20/2021 10:04:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/19/2021 1:02:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/18/2021 10:15:00 PM Julie CarterRecommendations for new windows and painting front of house 4/18/2021 1:46:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/18/2021 1:40:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/18/2021 9:04:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Today 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/15/2021 2:27:00 PM Julie CarterToday 11 am meet your London Assembly and Mayoral Candidate 4/15/2021 9:22:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Chiswick and Acton police station closures 4/14/2021 11:08:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Chiswick and Acton police station closures 4/14/2021 11:06:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Re:Re:Chiswick and Acton police station closures 4/14/2021 10:11:00 AM Julie CarterBest and cheapest watch repair - one week turn around - post in 4/14/2021 9:42:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Chiswick and Acton police station closures 4/14/2021 9:38:00 AM Julie CarterChiswick and Acton police station closures 4/14/2021 6:15:00 AM Julie CarterRe:Re:R.I.P. Prince Philipp 4/11/2021 7:23:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Voting on 6th 4/10/2021 11:11:00 AM Julie CarterRe:R.I.P. Prince Philipp 4/9/2021 2:04:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Chiswick resident on ballot for London Assembly 4/8/2021 4:08:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Re:Chiswick resident on ballot for London Assembly 4/8/2021 4:07:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Re:Chiswick resident on ballot for London Assembly 4/8/2021 4:05:00 PM Julie CarterChiswick resident on ballot for London Assembly 4/8/2021 12:56:00 PM Julie CarterRe:Door to Door Fish Salesmen - Strand on the Green warning 4/8/2021 11:54:00 AM Julie CarterRe:apology to Cllr  Biddolph 4/25/2022 7:06:00 AM David Lesniak

Maggie Dodge ● 1610d