Forum Topic

The problem he has is that the Ministerial Code for which he wrote the foreword states, "ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the prime minister."He has now beyond any argument lied in parliament in his many statements about the partygate issue. Even Johnson can't claim that the code doesn't apply to him because he can't offer his resignation to himself. The code simply assumes we would never elect a Prime Minister who is a liar.Although, as far as I am aware, Rishi Sunak never lied in parliament about his involvement in partygate, it now seems almost certain he will resign.This brings us back to who was behind the leaks about Sunak's wife's tax status. We know now it can't have been Johnson because he would have known Sunak would get an FPN and therefore wouldn't be able to challenge for the leadership.It has to be assumed than the Cabinet and therefore all the other leadership challengers knew. One theory put to me by a colleague is that they leaked the information about Sunak hoping he would blame Johnson and therefore be more likely to resign. If Sunak resigns, having offended much less than Johnson the pressure on Johnson will grow significantly to do the decent thing.The only thing that could save him now is if his challengers collectively decide to hold off until after the elections so the result can be blamed on him. They can do this safe in the knowledge that Johnson is so tarnished that, even if the Tories perform better than expected, he still won't survive a vote of no confidence.

Felicity Caborn ● 1625d

Comparison to the Republicans in the U.S. made in yesterday's 'i'. They too protected Trump by lying to protect him, even the two who were a bit critical and realised what damage was being done to the Republican party then swallowed their criticism, and one even flew to Mar-a-Lago 'to pay homage' to the orange one, pathetic. "In reality, the Republican party surrendered its principles to Trumpism long before that final shocking moment, averting its gaze from first small and then larger outrages - because he was winning and because they feared his base. The huge crisis did not come out of the blue. It was the culmination of many events that normalised a culture of rule-breaking."" The U.K. Prime Monster has not fomented insurrection or attempted to rig an election, though he did unlawfully  suspend Parliament over Brexit. His misdeed are mostly offences of self- gratification. But there is a warning to the Conservative Party in the path trodden by their political soulmates across the Atlantic. Once you surrender your commitment to core values, it is hard to hold on to your party.So, as Tories prevaricate over how to respond to The Prime Minster's fine for attending a Downing Street party in a pandemic lockdown - the question they must ask is how many blind eyes they can turn before their party, too, is lost?"The final paragraph is the killer. "Johnson's contempt for the rules is dragging down his party and more important, faith in the system. Only opposition weakness keeps the Tories afloat. His Chancellor and his staff are already tainted. Eventually his party will be too. There may be a cost for bringing Johnson down, but ultimately there will be a higher one for failing to do so."

Vanessa Smith ● 1621d