ST: "If you were so sure that Vine wasn’t being paid, why didn’t you assert as much on 11th or 12th?"Dear oh dear. You didn't ask whether JV was being paid, but how much (twice). That is, you automatically assumed he WAS being paid, before you knew the facts.And as you are the poster who brought up the (bogus) issue of payment, it is YOU who should have to justify your comment, not others their lack of comment. On which latter point, although I guessed JV most likely wasn't being paid, I waited until AFTER the facts were clear before speaking up.Meanwhile, your unpleasant and baseless insinuation against JV shows you to be prejudiced, in the literal sense of the word i.e. prejudging.While your contining to bump the thread up even after being shown to have been plumb wrong, shows a distinct lack of humility.May I suggest that a quick "Sorry, got it wrong", would have served your cause rather better than continuing to draw further attention to it, while calling others who corrected your error "silly"?
Richard Cathcart ● 1619d