Forum Topic

There can be no doubt Johnson has had a good war. From what I hear he did have to exert pressure to get the current level of military support to Ukraine in the face of some resistance from within government.That said it was only a war that could have saved him and it is hard to imagine he couldn't believe his luck when the conflict broke out. He is old enough the remember the deep unpopularity of Mrs Thatcher before Falklands War.Looking back on what he has said over the past decade, it is difficult to conclude that he is either a Russian asset or some sort of Nostradamus about Ukraine.It seems to me reasonable to assume that the Russians cross-subsidised his columns in the Telegraph because they wanted to give him a platform. They are sophisticated enough to know that if they told him to weekly tell readers how marvellous his friend Vladimir was his credibility would be blown but they would have been quite content with his regular EU bashing as it served their purposes.While he was never a Putin cheer leader, Johnson seemed reluctant to criticise him and would often pick up on Kremlin talking points. Following the first invasion of Ukraine, Johnson blamed EU foreign policy for what he describes pointedly as Russian action in 'The Ukraine'. He also praised Putin for his 'ruthless clarity' in acting against ISIS in Palmyra in concert with Assad's forces - this being a regime that had launched a chemical attack on its own citizens.However, Johnson's attitude to Putin does seem to change when he is in government. Remember that he is not allowed to get the £250,000 per annum that get from the Telegraph when he is a minister. It seems a lifetime ago but Wallpapergate was basically down to Johnson not being able to afford to decorate his own flat himself.As it seems unlikely that the Russians will ever have the inclination or resources to try and exert soft power again, Johnson can quite happily burn his boats with them and pose as the most hawkish of western leaders. It is up to each of us to decide if he does this in his personal self interest or a commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine.

Jeremy Parkinson ● 1639d