Forum Topic

What function does the Staveley Road / Park Road Barrier fulfil now that access to Burlington (from the A316) has been closed and the restricted times on Staveley Road (East) greatly extended?During most of the the morning and evening rush hours, and during the working day, the only people who can access the area are those local residents who have registered on the council scheme plus a few exemptions. This is apparently less than 2,000 people and it is just plain daft to think that all of these will want to drive down Staveley Road on the same day.From past experience we know that the existence of the barrier has simply forced drivers on to Burlington Lane. Before the new restrictions were imposed this amounted to an additional 2,000 'traffic movements' a day over and above those travelling along this road pre-Covid.So it is highly like that now the new restrictions (Burlington Lane Lane closure and extended hours of Staveley Road East) are in place that most of those who can enter the area will choose to drive down Burlington Lane.So I have a simple question for those who believe that the barrier should (at huge cost) be made permanent. WHY SHOULD THE RESIDENTS OF STAVELEY ROAD NOT SHARE SOME OF THE MUCH REDUCED TRAFFIC BURDEN WITH BURLINGTON LANE RESIDENTS?.If you have not seen the design for the permanent barrier I suggest that you click  https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/info/20053/transport/2181/south_chiswick_liveable_neighbourhood/7  Hounslow Council have, in a stroke of pure genius, designed a scheme that is too narrow for one of their recycling vehicles and an Ocado delivery vehicle to pass travelling in opposite directions. Welcome back to medieval times when waste was collected by horse and cart and home supplies came in a horse powered wagon. Of course some of us are so old that we have wistful memories of the public floggings, witch burnings and the pelting of miscreants in the stocks. Happy days. A sweet young person asked me at the street meeting if anyone actually lives on Burlington Lane. I had to smile and remember that I was once young and callow. When I informed that her there were indeed nearly as many people living on Burlington Lane (and the Sutton Court Rd extension to Lawford Rd) as lived on Staveley Road. She countered with the strongly held "fact" that "but of course Burlington Lane is a much wider road". Fortunately a resident of Staveley Road put her right. I think that the young person might need to take a trip to Spec Savers.    Sadly I think that we have to face the fact that Hounslow Council and the Cycle Lobby are more concerned about losing face if they admit that building a permanent barrier is a fatuous waste of public money - rather than in agreeing with the vast majority of local residents that they have got this wrong.Incidentally, I recently asked a senior Hounslow Traffic Officer what the purpose of making the barrier permanent was. He had to think for a moment before he, in all seriousness, replied "without the barrier there will be traffic chaos after 7.00 pm". I laughed in his face (but in a caring and responsible way). He does not live in the borough and he has no experience of Staveley road pre-Covid, nor of course have either he or any of his colleagues done any traffic modelling to back up this assertion.    See you all at the public meeting on the 17th March (St Patrick's Day) at St Paul's Church Grove Park from 7.00 pm. Past the bed time of most of us oldies I know but perhaps just this once you can make an exception. Cllrs Steve Curran and Hanif Khan have been invited .... Financial journalist and radio presenter Paul Lewis will ensure fair play as an independent chair for the evening.    

Cllr Sam Hearn ● 1670d

Oh dear Sam you are really so out of touch that you are unaware of pre-school clubs, breakfast clubs and other support services offered to hard-working parents trying to make ends meet as cost of living soars. Never mind teachers and other people who are travelling to work in a healthy and sustainable way that causes no harm to anybody else. Grove Park Primary School is at the other end. You go over Sutton Court Road and take the first left. Get on your bike one morning and follow one of the increasing number of parents cycling cargo bikes westbound to understand how people are moving in the area now that one road is not hostile. Some are also using that route to then access the Grove Park Terrace school street, turning right via the Riverview LTN to use the Strand on the Green LTN to access SOTG primary and the adjacent nursery. We now have one road that provides safe passage for people who aren't in cars. Just one road. And it is attracting more and more people to use it. You are really advocating to take that away from people because you think it is unfair if traffic is not equally distributed across two roads? That's not the strong argument you think it is and the more you explain yourself the more clear it becomes why you find this all so bewildering. You see the world through a windscreen. There is no restriction on Burlington Lane for me to support. I am supporting the one that is in situ and that works so well for pedestrians and cyclists. In addition to the other two reasons I have previously provided to why this barrier is useful there is now a very obvious additional one - it protects pedestrians and cyclists from all the illegal drivers ignoring the road signs for the pedestrian and cycling zone on the A316 end of Staveley Road who continue to pour through at a rate of about £650 to £1000 in PCNs per minute during the evening and morning rush hours during the times of the restrictions.I do agree that speed cameras are also a great idea in addition to the current restrictions to further increase road safety and enforce the 20mph limit. I look forward to seeing the local Conservatives publicising their lobbying for the government to devolve the authority for speeding enforcement to local authorities so that speed cameras can be deployed by the Council using funds secured from illegal drivers and then for speed cameras on Burlington Lane and Sutton Court Road and Hartington Road. And no Jim I am not campaigning to remove any traffic restrictions. I am campaigning for more of them.

Paul Campbell ● 1668d