Forum Topic

The 'No Entry Motor Vehicles Except for Access' restriction is between the junction of SOTG/S Circular and near the junction of Grove Park Rd and Grove Park Terrace.The signage is a red circle with a car and motorbike on it with "Except for buses, taxis & for access" below.It is ok to enter the area by either direction, stop to access a location within the area then leave by either direction.SOTG CPZ is operational 10am-noon and 6pm-8pm weekdays and 2pm-4pm weekends.  The evening and weekend times are intended to prevent parking from people visiting the new Brentford stadium.The one hour restriction applies to pay & display and shared use parking bays.  There was already a one hour restriction for some of these locations (you can see the 1 hour sign in the parking bays near Strand Cafe and the Steam Packet on Google street view from 2018)The Hounslow website says the following regarding blue badge parking:"Residents who have disabled blue badges are eligible to park in on-street pay & display / pay by phone, shared use and permit holder bays (except where controlled signs state otherwise) without displaying a residents’ parking permit.Disabled (Blue) badge holders are exempt for up to 3 hours on yellow lines, except where loading restrictions are in place and provided their vehicle does not cause road safety or congestion / hazardous problems."This isn't explicit about the one hour restriction and blue badge however the one hour restriction has been in place in some locations for around 4 years anyway, so if you've parked in these locations without problem, I don't see what has changed...

Michael Robinson ● 1687d

Michael you really do not get it do you. Most residents when asked have rejected the schemes now being implemented as permanent measures by Hounslow Council. This is not democratic and it has broken any remaining trust that residents might have had in Hounslow Council. The mask has dropped and everyone can see them for the self-absorbed control freaks that they are.The Conservative Candidates running in Chiswick Riverside Ward (Giles, Thompson and Wallace) and indeed all those across Chiswick and the Borough have a shared vision: No new LTNs or cycle routes unless blinding public consultation shows that they are approved by residents. All existing LTNs and cycle routes to be independently reviewed and then subject to binding public consultations that could lead to the schemes being modified or removed. ANPR camera based schemes would be one of the options considered - we now have the money to pay for them thanks to the PCN fines on Hartington Road.Hounslow is now preaching the gospel of 'social engagement'. Who in their right mind can believe them? Tackling climate change at a local level requires close collaboration between residents, residents's groups, schools, businesses and charities. What a wasted opportunity the current schemes have been. What a waste of officers's time. What a waste of public money. The evidence that the schemes have been a success is slim to say the least. The Overview and Scrutiny Call In Panel saw right through all the bluster and bovine excrement offered up as evidence by the Hounslow Cabinet Members. Who can demonstrate a quantifiable improvement in air quality on any street that is not matched by a deterioration in air quality on another street? Who can demonstrate that there has been a sustainable modal shift - residents now cycling, using public transport or walking when in the past they would have driven?  The new experimental measures introduced this month have solved some problems but created others and added greatly to the complexity that residents, businesses, tradesmen and visitors are faced with daily.By the way, I saw a mobile van parked up on Strand-on-the-Green a few months ago. Perhaps you would like to tell me what exactly it was doing there - officers have been very sheepish when I have asked. The truth is that for the scheme to be implemented properly you would need two linked ANPR cameras that could detect vehicles entering and leaving the restricted area. One mobile camera car cannot do that even if it sat there all day - which of course it did not. It went where is could earn some money fining people.

Cllr Sam Hearn ● 1687d

There have been quite a few amendments to the schemes that have gone in as ETOs locally: TGT restrictions removed; Devonshire Road restrictions amended; SOTG/Hartington & Staveley Rd restrictions changed; Burlington Lane scheme put in; Cycleway 9 amended.It is quite demonstrably false to say that there was never any intention other than to make temporary schemes permanent when that is not what has happened. It may be true that there are some Chiswick people who would only be satisfied if everything went back to how it was before but that is a different argument. We've been around the houses so many times on the difference  between a consultation and a referendum but I'm dying to hear what Councillor Hearn, in full electioneering mode, considers to be a "blinding public consultation". Assuming he means "binding" is he trying to turn consultation on how we do things differently to improve the environment into votes? Haven't we had enough of Tories using referenda to persuade the public to vote for things that are not actually in their interest? And so should we have a vote on every change to a road layout or only the ones that motorists don't like? Should we vote on how long the green man is allowed to stay on for on every ped crossing? After all that slows down motorists, creates congestion and idling engines pumping particulates into our lungs. Why shouldn't Chiswick's motorists get to participate in a binding vote to remove every pedestrian crossing in our area? Anything less is a democratic deficit right?

Paul Campbell ● 1687d