Forum Topic

James Roy quoted Steve Taylor thus"People need laws to tell them how to behave."And then went onOrwell, would that you were alive now!butNever Argue With a Fool, Onlookers May Not Be Able To Tell the Difference...While as George Orwell himself explainedquote:“Here one comes upon an all-important English trait: the respect for constituitionalism and legality, the belief in 'the law' as something above the state and above the individual, something which is cruel and stupid, of course, but at any rate incorruptible.It is not that anyone imagines the law to be just. Everyone knows that there is one law for the rich and another for the poor. But no one accepts the implications of this, everyone takes for granted that the law, such as it is, will be respected, and feels a sense of outrage when it is not. Remarks like 'They can't run me in; I haven't done anything wrong', or 'They can't do that; it's against the law', are part of the atmosphere of England."unquote:Why I Write (1946)Rather more nuanced in other words.So that ..." everyone takes for granted that the law, such as it is, will be respected, and feels a sense of outrage when it is not."Possibly comes closest to the position Steve Taylor finds himself in in demanding more stringent rules be applied to what is clearly anti social behaviour. The fact that this is totally impractical is entirely another matter.While the supposition that George Orwell was in any way opposed to the rule of law in all circumstances is so laughable as to be unworthy of further comment. michael adams...

Michael Adams ● 1734d

Jayne,Can I ask you again ... how do you know it was the omicron variant of the virus that your friends who experienced mild colds and tested positive on a PCR test, had?I agree that it's likely that most of them had the omicron variant given that it is now the most prevalent strain in the UK, and it is generally acknowledged that most  omicron infections result in nothing worse than a mild cold, but you still can't know, unless the virus that infected each of your friends had been sequenced, and there simply isn't the capacity to do that with the high number of viral infections we are experiencing.I have a friend who came down with COVID before Christmas, and he was pretty ill for over two weeks, felt like he couldn't get out of bed except to go to the loo. I'm reasonably confident that it wasn't the omicron variant that he had, but I don't know that for certain, I just think it's highly likely. There's a chance (small I grant you) that he had the omicron variant, but only sequencing would rule out that small chance.With your friends, I think there's a much larger chance that at least one or two of them had a variant that wasn't omicron. Do you not agree?BTW The vaccine in the UK has been a huge success, the UK got off to a flying start compared with most other countries, I don't think we're significantly different from a lot of other countries now in terms of how we've made the vaccine available to people, it's more down now to who wants to still get vaccinated.I was really surprised there wasn't a circuit breaker after Christmas, and perhaps we'll see whether that was a good thing or not in the next few weeks. If staff absences increase more and more, then perhaps a circuit breaker would have been a good thing, but we can all speculate and there's plenty of data out there that can point one way and plenty that can point the other.On that note, Happy New Year.

Andrew Jones ● 1726d

NHS doctors and nurses follow the NHS directive on ppe. Many doctors and nurses only wear them only when seeing patients. I have seen this first hand as my wife is a nurse. Social distancing is non-existent and often impossible and colleagues mostly remove masks and ppe away from patients as they have been wearing them for hours. The others that you see religiously wear the masks, like you, truly believe on the pseudoscience that they will stop transmission.You have missed my point about masks completely. A virus particle can easily travel in and out of your face mask regardless of which type, how tight or how many you pile on your face, that is a fact. A droplet from a sick person who is sneezing or coughing can obviously be stopped by a face covering, hence why we used to stress to people ‘cover your mouth’ when coughing in public before the covid era, but if someone is sick and has symptoms they should be resting at home. A mask does nothing for the healthy person. Certainly no benefit outdoors in the open air. There are negative effects in fact which you can easily research.Just to give you one example. My wife and consultants she works with force patients to remove their masks and gloves as soon as they enter the clinic as the masks and gloves are re-used and harbouring bacteria. Patients touch the mask door handles and equipment in a sterile clinics spreading bacteria. I urge you to research and stay open minded do not just do what you see others do. I myself work on different IT equipment in shops, hospitality, banks and healthcare. A pattern I see everyday is staff putting their masks on just before opening up to the public and remove them at the back on breaks or at closing time.

Aaron Araein ● 1725d

“ There were 139 deaths involving the coronavirus (COVID-19) in teaching and educational professionals aged 20 to 64 years registered between 9 March and 28 December 2020 in England and Wales. For both sexes, rates of death involving COVID-19 for this group were statistically significantly lower than the rate of death involving COVID-19 among those of the same age and sex, with 18.4 deaths per 100,000 males (66 deaths) and 9.8 deaths per 100,000 females (73 deaths), compared with 31.4 and 16.8 deaths per 100,000 in the population among males and females respectively.Of the individual occupations, it was only possible to calculate a reliable rate for secondary education teaching professionals, who accounted for 37.4% of the total number of deaths among all teaching and educational professionals (52 deaths). With 39.2 deaths per 100,000 males (29 deaths) and 21.2 deaths per 100,000 females (23 deaths), rates of death involving COVID-19 in secondary education teaching professionals were not statistically significantly different than those of the same age and sex in the wider population.We also compared the teaching occupations with all other professional occupations, allowing us to see how the deaths compare with professions with similar broad economic and educational backgrounds. We found that rates of death involving COVID-19 in all teaching and educational professionals were not statistically significantly different to the rates seen in professional occupations (17.6 deaths per 100,000 males; 12.8 deaths per 100,000 females) as a whole, true for both sexes. Of the specific teaching and education professions, the rate of death involving COVID-19 in male secondary education teaching professionals was statistically significantly higher than the rate of death involving COVID-19 in professional occupations in men of the same age.”

Steve Taylor ● 1722d

"And thus the credibility of social media takesyet another hit."Nothing to do with social media and nothing to do with the 'Mail'. However, I would be pleased to receive the  Purely factual based on personal experience and no, I will not reveal the school or the Borough for obvious reasons. Suffice to say it isn't Hounslow. I reiterate - teachers have been expressly forbidden to use Sshhh in the school. However, interesting news today that the Nanny State of absurdity is now extending to higher places of learning inasmuch as Jane Ayre now comes with a warning that some of her work may be distressing to some readers. How sick is that.    "Read Jane Eyre if you dare: University students are given 'trigger warnings' for classic literature - as Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre and Charles Dickens's Great Expectations are marked 'distressing'They have been celebrated as classics of English literature for more than 150 years, enjoyed by generations of children as young as eight.But university students have now been given a 'trigger warning' that Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre and Charles Dickens's Great Expectations both contain passages they might find 'distressing'.Critics last night described the cautions given to students at Salford University as 'absurd'. Tory MP Andrew Bridgen said it was ridiculous that adults 'have to be protected from the stories that generations of children have been able to cope with without being damaged'.And actor Simon Callow, who has appeared in several Dickens adaptations, joked: 'I don't think the university authorities have gone far enough.'A more helpful alert would be: 'Warning – this book may make you think. In extreme cases, it may even make you feel. If you seem to be thinking or feeling, call our helpline, 24-hour service. Do not delay, thinking and feeling can rapidly become consensus-threatening.' 'Published in 1861, Great Expectations describes orphan Pip's adventures with characters including the fugitive Abel Magwitch, the eccentric Miss Havisham and the beautiful but cruel Estella – and includes vivid imagery of poverty, prison ships and fights to the death.Meanwhile Jane Eyre, written in 1847, charts the romance between Bronte's titular heroine and the troubled Mr Rochester, but also describes her unhappy childhood as an abandoned orphan.Mr Bridgen added: 'Victorian readers could cope with tales of workhouses and children being groomed into criminal gangs. But we are in danger of creating a dystopian future far darker than any Victorian novel.'The warnings accompany a reading list given to students on Salford's BA English literature course, and have been revealed in response to a Freedom of Information request.The university warns undergraduates: 'There are scenes and discussions of violence and sexual violence in several of the primary texts studied on this module. Some students may find the content of the following texts distressing.' "

Steve Taylor ● 1718d

Alan I don’t care to drag this on as it is clear it would be pointless to discuss this with you, you have been living in a bubble.You judge me but in fact everything you say is consistent with what we have been hearing for almost two years on the telly. I will this last time list some things below that they didn’t show you on tv or print in the papers.Again Alan these are not my views and ideas, and I am not qualified to propose a pandemic strategy but if you would like to do some research you will find several other world famous experts, (epidemiologists, microbiologist etc.) who have expressed their alternative views on the pandemic. To clarify regarding masks, it is not just a droplet a virus travels in, you can breath it in and out. Please take some time to research what type of mask is worn in labs when handling a virus, (spoiler alert, it isn’t one you would have seen anybody wear). https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/COVID-19-total-announced-deaths-30-December-2021-weekly-file.xlsx(Once you click ‘view’, choose sixth tap along labelled ‘tab3 death by condition’)The column under ‘No’ will show total deaths OF covid from the start of this pandemic to 30/12/2021. To give you some perspective about 400-500 people die daily with cancer. Other big causes of death include heart disease, dementia, etc. We have had no diet or lifestyle restrictions to reduce these numbers.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00258-1/fulltext?s=08#%20https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v2.full.pdfThe above two links paint a different reality to what you have been told. First link by Lancet has been clear in recent government weekly surveillance reports and second a major Denmark study with shocking results displayed in the table on the last page.Do with them what you like, but if you are not open to other possibilities and views because you think what you believe is absolute than you are following a religion.

Aaron Araein ● 1718d