Forum Topic

Music is often used in TV and film to dictate to the viewer how a particular scene should make us feel. We are being told subliminally that something is unsettling or funny and how we ought to be reacting. It’s a very useful and powerful tool in controlling our emotions but try using the wrong music and our perception changes. Imagine the shower scene from Psycho but with the Benny Hill theme music and you get the idea.I see Michael as somebody who is using the wrong music. In constantly seeking out the dark side he doesn't seem to care how ridiculous he appears even though to any sane person his ideas are remarkably childish. It's the monster under the bed, the ghost at the bottom of the stairway, the unseen person that you can feel rather than see behind you. The Bogey Man is everywhere in Michael’s world. His automatic default in assuming that everybody and everything is out to get him (aliens, Baphomet, Covid is a hoax / it isn't a hoax, the vaccine is a population control, all tragedies are Psy Ops etc) must be absolutely exhausting for him but his views are validated by the YouTube channels he watches and believes. Elevating himself above us by claiming that he has ‘Intel’ into World events gives him the right to call us ‘Fools’ apparently, though why a carpenter from West London would have Intel into the US elections is beyond me.We can find evil in absolutely everything if we look hard enough but you really have to want to find it (or invent it) to fit your agenda. To somehow conclude that Covid was man made in order to force everybody in the World to have a vaccine in order to control humanity is in my view a step too far, even for Michael. To seriously present to us AS FACT the notion that there is a satanic ruling elite who have somehow managed to cross all religious, language and cultural boundaries in order to concoct a plan to control the World population via a vaccine when as nations combined we can’t even cure the common cold is not only absurd, it is laughable. And yet we are the fools?

Chris Blackwell ● 1795d

Let’s examine the consequences of adhering to the M Brown approach to dealing with the pandemic. His recommendations are simple: no vaccines; let the people who are ‘healthy’ simply catch the virus and hopefully be fine; shield everyone else (I think that is what "hide away" meant). First, the ‘shield everyone else’. That presumably means the over 80’s of which there are 3.2 million people, plus the clinically extremely vulnerable of which there are 2.2 million, plus also a further 1.5 million the NHS recommends being shielded. It seems likely there is an overlap between vulnerable and over 80 – so the total is likely to be less than the 6.9 million from these three groups – say 5 million.That is 5 million people forced the isolate and remain imprisoned in isolation for an undetermined length of time. Not 10 days isolation but 2 years or more of effectively imprisonment. No visitors from friends and relatives. Simply inhuman confinement and no freedom of movement or direct interaction with others. This is beyond cruelty for them and those close to them. It is long term suffering for the 5 million plus the many more millions who are close to them. It is a disgusting notion and one that anyone suggesting it should be damned for it.Then there is the remaining 60 million of ‘healthy’ people. The survival rate of this group appears to be age dependent – so 96% for over 70’s (5 million people) but 99.95% for the under 20’s (17 million). Roughly 99.5% for the rest (38 million). So that would result in 400,000 deaths. So my guess is that M Brown is looking at this number and thinking ‘that’s ok’ (ignoring that its 250% higher than the current mortality level from Covid and this does not include deaths from the 5 million who are locked in isolation but some will still get Covid and most of those will die). Nice.Death is one (tragic) thing. Hospitalisation is another. Last November the UK total number in hospital peaked at 40,000 with 4,500 in ICU. With the M Brown ‘let the infections continue unchecked this number would be much, much higher. There are 100,000 hospital beds in the UK (more if you count in day treatment, maternity, etc) and 6,000 ICU beds. Plus other treatments do need to continue – the backlog is horrendous now. The M Brown approach of letting the ‘healthy get ill’ will quickly overwhelm our health service. People will literally be dying at home, in hospital corridors, in temporary but largely unstaffed field hospitals. People who are injured or ill with other conditions will be turned away. Nurses and doctors will contract Covid in huge numbers, preventing them from working. It will be scenes of chaos, tragedy and suffering. So a great plan.Then there is the problem of long Covid. This seems to affect half of those who get Covid. The issues are fatigue, pains, difficulty with mobility, damage to organs, skin conditions, and digestive problems. We do not yet know the longer term effects of Covid on these ‘survivors’. We do not yet know the increase in vulnerability should these ‘survivors’ contract a new Covid variant. With the M Brown plan half the population will suffer long Covid – 30 million people. Nice of him.So Mr Brown, your plan is very, very bad. Callous and certain to cause great suffering. Its fortunate that no-one takes you or your views seriously.

Alan Clark ● 1759d

Andrew, let’s assume that the information we’re being given is correct, and that more unvaccinated people are dying of covid than vaccinated – you still have to consider harms caused by the vaccines, which includes death, but this information is completely ignored by the mainstream media, the government and their scientists. We have to look for such information ourselves, and the figures appear to be high. Also, if covid patient levels are low in comparison to patients in hospital for other reasons, which I believe they are, I don’t see that it’s such a big deal.I have a friend who was healthy before he had his two jabs, but now he’s under the hospital for chronic fatigue, swollen lymph glands and an eyeball that’s developed a mind of its own. Another friend (friend of a friend who I sometimes see) saw his arm swell up soon after vaccination, and it turned out that his arm was full of blood clots. My sister’s work involves interaction with the police, and she was talking to a policeman recently and the subject of covid arose. He told her that his wife, upon taking her second jab, collapsed and had to be resuscitated. Then, this week, my sister told me that one of her daughter’s friends was rushed to A&E after having the vaccine, although I don’t know what the issue was. My contacts list isn’t high, but these examples appear to be typical of what is occurring worldwide. If governments cared about people’s health, this would be of great concern, but they are not at all interested. Only covid serves the agenda so only covid counts.If you test positive for covid and die in a car crash within 28 days, you’ll be a covid death and get a mention on the headline news. Die within hours of a covid vaccine and it didn’t happen. It’s being reported that A&E departments around the country are struggling to deal with the high volumes of casualties arriving by ambulance. I don’t think that covid hospital admissions or deaths are particularly high at present, so I suspect that the increases in A&E numbers, which have been particularly high since the vaccine booster programme commenced, is due to the vaccine injured. However, it’s difficult to fully understand the situation and have a proper debate on the pros and cons of vaccination in such biased circumstances. In fact, rather than be open and look at all relevant information to establish what may be in people’s best interests, which would undoubtedly vary from person to person, the government has indicated that they’d rather force-vax the nation.

Michael Brown ● 1742d