Forum Topic

CS9 - Changes, they are a comin'

As a stakeholder this is the second time we've had to hear about CS9 via word of mouth:Dear Stakeholder, I’m writing to provide an update on the temporary version of Cycleway 9 on Chiswick High Road. Background to the temporary changes   Hounslow Council and Transport for London (TfL) want more people to walk, cycle and use public transport. There are huge benefits for the local community and the economy – fewer road casualties, improved air quality, less congestion and healthier residents. TfL and Hounslow ran public consultations in 2017 and 2019 into proposals for Cycleway 9 including Chiswick High Road, and there was clear support for the vision. In December 2019 we started construction of a range of measures at Kew Bridge, including protected cycle lanes and access restrictions to Wellesley Road / Stile Hall Gardens.    Due to the pandemic and constraints on our funding however, it was necessary for us and Hounslow to develop a new temporary layout, as part of a trial. In December 2020, we and Hounslow introduced these trial changes along Chiswick High Road, including protected cycle lanes. These changes sought to enable more cycling as an emergency response to the coronavirus and to help avoid a car-based recovery.     Cycling & road safety Our data shows that cycling is one of the only modes of transport to have increased during the pandemic, with current cycling levels around 40% up compared to the baseline. Our data shows particularly significant increases at weekends, of more than 200% in certain locations. Data for Chiswick High Road shows that up to 2,700 people are now cycling at weekends, including families and children. The number of people cycling is growing and there were 72% more cyclists on weekdays in April 2021 than in February 2021. Cycling is now an important transport mode allowing people to safely get around and in April 2021 daily counts showed that people cycling made up 20% of all ‘vehicles’ on Chiswick High Road.    Another reason for introducing temporary protected cycle lanes along Chiswick High Road was to address the high number of cycling casualties that unfortunately occurred each year. Making streets safer for the most vulnerable road users is a key priority for us. It’s therefore really encouraging that the latest provisional data from the Metropolitan Police suggests it is now much safer to cycle along Chiswick High Road than before the cycle lanes were introduced.  In the 12 months before we introduced the new temporary cycle lanes to Chiswick High Road, there were eight collisions. In the six months since we introduced the temporary scheme, there have been only two collisions.    Traffic flow and people’s views locally While cycling has increased significantly, Tube and bus use remains lower than before the pandemic and car use is now back to pre-pandemic levels. The recent increase in car use in west London is at certain times in some locations leading to longer traffic queues and slightly slower bus journey times (in May 2021, bus journey times were up to 1.3 minutes per km slower than the average in 2019).    Some people have rightly raised concerns about this. Residents have suggested that we should reinstate a traffic lane at the Chiswick Lane/Chiswick High Road junction along with other changes. People have also highlighted concerns that the trial changes were introduced without advance consultation. The public aren’t normally consulted before changes are trialled, and there was an urgent need to introduce the scheme quickly as an emergency response to the coronavirus. Even so, we understand and accept that residents have a voice and want to be heard.     Other residents have told us they support the cycle lanes and want them to stay, which is reflected in the increase in people cycling. We commissioned independent representative research to get a balanced view from residents in the area. This research shows that there is support from residents for the protected cycle lanes in Chiswick High Road, with 47% in support of the scheme.     Listening We have looked at the traffic data closely and listened to the issues raised by residents and businesses. We believe the right way forward is to make some changes to Chiswick High Road, and then hold a new consultation with local people and other stakeholders.  We will make the changes as part of an experiment, and we will closely monitor their effects. The consultation would support our monitoring by allowing local people to tell us about their experiences of the effects of the scheme. We will also use the outcomes of the consultation to help us decide what the longer-term future of the scheme should be. The changes we plan to make to the scheme are:   • Reinstate the left-turn lane at the Chiswick Lane junction to improve traffic flow and bus journey times   • Introduce an eastbound bus lane between Holmfield Road and Netheravon Road, and a westbound bus lane between Airedale Avenue and Netheravon Road to improve bus journey times. • Make a series of other changes between Chiswick Lane and Heathfield Terrace, including new bus shelters at bus stops and more places for taxis and other vehicles to pick up and drop off passengers. These changes will be better for bus passengers and make it easier for the elderly and disabled to use taxis and other vehicles.  In July 2021, Hounslow Council will decide whether it agrees to these changes, but we wanted to set out what changes could be made and what they would mean as soon as possible. We will publish more of the data we have collected over the last six months in future updates. Between 15 and 26 February 2021, as part of our continuous engagement about the temporary changes to Chiswick High Road, we arranged for members of the public with an interest in the Cycleway 9 Streetspace scheme to speak to a member of our Local Communities and Partnerships team, one-on-one, via Microsoft Teams. You can view a full copy of our ‘Community Conversations’ Engagement Report here.  We continue to encourage comments and suggestions by emailing haveyoursay@tfl.gov.uk. I hope this information is helpful.Yours sincerely, Elinor Elinor Thomas | Engagement OfficerTransport for London | City Planning | Local Communities & Partnerships Email: elinorthomas@TfL.gov.uk

David Lesniak ● 1934d18 Comments

Note to Ed: green spaces, especially urban ones, are made up of softscaping (plants) and hardscaping (pavement, benches, etc.)Another note to Ed: I did not advocate for pavement removal on DR. No one is. The pavement, you may note, stays the same and indeed that might be part of the problem/solution. I did, however, advocate for the community and particularly residents to be able to use DR as the access it is to a large swath of homes. You somehow think it appropriate for residents in this patch to be treated in a different manner to those in other LTNs where permits and white lists exist to allow access to one's home and limit through traffic (side note to anyone opting to cite Homefields - it is not a through route any longer, hasn't been for twenty odd years, plus Jeremy Vine would never let it be reinstated as such so take the win).  They, too, have multiple access points yet never once has anyone wanted to limit residents to these areas coming and going from all directions.Community access is for the purpose of trade regardless of business sector. It is meant to bolster all struggling businesses. You seem to only care about hospitality businesses on DR and only those who have access to the additional pavement = the three I mentioned. Not all need it. Not all can access it - Rokkon on the east side comes to mind. You, on the other hand, are happy to drive nails into the coffins of other struggling businesses evidenced by your email to me re Top Hat. Oddly, you don't mention the other dry cleaner. So we have Urban Pantry being used to bolster your position - they don't and can't access pavement space because theirs comes with the premises and doesn't require a permit and we have the other dry cleaners that somehow flies under your radar. Let's not even get into access to the clinics both of which treat those with chronic pain and somehow people are not able to freely access them by car. Not everyone has or needs a blue badge. Some just need to park nearby to get themselves or others to an appointment. Not rocket science.What's so funny to me is you attempt to prohibit Mrs. Smith from driving to the dry cleaner and Mr. Jones from driving to his appointment and Person X from driving home to Reckitt Road via DR. But you air-freight goods globally. Surely your carbon footprint is worse than any of these people whose lives you want to impact and worse, limit.

David Lesniak ● 1932d

Wow, Ed. Thanks so much for the odd mix of vitriol and obsession.Few things: as previously mentioned but obviously forgotten (no doubt deliberately) our application to the Labour council to mitigate existing conditions for improving access was denied. The way I see it, if they can't sort out a tube stop, does one measly cafe matter that much to you? Maybe aim higher. We do, however, hop to immediately if anyone for any reason should need help with access. Guess that's not good enough for you. Oh well.  I know detail isn't your strong suit. The ruddy bit is brick. Concrete pavers of various quality and color are mixed in to create a pattern.The paint shop has a loading bay immediately outside its doors, a rear access customers often use to drive up to within inches to collect and they do local deliveries for which the driver is personally responsible for any PCNs. The recently imposed LTNs have been a nightmare for him. In terms of parking in front, we know it's been an issue for some over the years. When we migrated from the Dukes Meadow market we thought customers might follow but were told by many they didn't because there was no place to park. So loyal customers gone. Bookings are often delayed because parking isn't easily found. That can have a domino effect on service and subsequent  bookings. And some folks have just given up altogether. The hair salon says the same. They have clients who go to their Ealing location simply because they know they can park. Good for the salon, but bad for neighbouring businesses. We've never had the benefit of 30-minute free parking as TGT and DR has/had. Hounslow said something inane about the intersection being too close to CHR. How intersections with the same thing can be closer or further away remains a mystery. Some businesses have the support of the council in the form of infrastructure and amenity provided and others do not. This despite their obligation to represent all of us.

David Lesniak ● 1932d