Forum Topic

If the Chiswick Conservative Councillors and The OC (are they distinct?) do not oppose all restrictions absolutely then they must be admitting that on some days of the week or at some times or in some places it is perfectly acceptable to discriminate against the elderly and less able, block ambulances, prevent tradesmen accessing businesses or residents, trap residents in their houses negatively impacting their mental health, displace traffic causing congestion and pollution, force people to take long detours burning petrol, and disproportionaly affect poorer residents and diverse communities living on the routes to which traffic is displaced.So far it seems that in the case of Devonshire Road some opponents of Streetspace now accept that all of these things are acceptable at weekends or just on Sundays and the traders have reached a consensus that they are acceptable after 5pm every day.Of course all of these things are totally acceptable every day and at all times if the traffic restriction in question was installed before 2020. Particularly if the Streetspace opponent personally benefits from the traffic restriction. Which in Chiswick, outside of the Riverside Ward, most do because there are so many of them.I think that we are seeing a gradual and unexpected shift in the Overton window. If it is OK to cause all of this damage to society after 5pm maybe one day it will be ok between noon and 2pm, for example. If on a Saturday and Sunday, maybe a bit more chaos on a Friday will be tolerable? Let's see .....

Paul Campbell ● 1952d

Ed Saper writes: "Politicians with an agenda don't do surveys because they want to know what people think.  They do them to justify the decisions they've already taken.  And yes - that works for both sides of course.  But a survey designed and hand delivered* by a politician is going to have a lot more in-built bias than one done by an independent third party to Market Research Society standards (which this one wasn't, despite the claim).  *Actually, I don't know if Biddolph hand delivered the survey, but I'm going to leave it in as it just sounds like the sort of thing she would have done :-)”For clarity, the Chiswick Shops Task Force did conduct the survey because we wanted to know what traders thought.  That was the point of the survey.  We had already had a great deal of feedback on the Devonshire Road Streetspace scheme which was a very useful starting point for compiling the questions.  Those comments were not in favour of the Streetspace status quo.  There was, however, a free-flowing section for traders to add their comments and many did.  Some traders added comments in emails when they returned their completed surveys.  They were free to say that they wanted the road to stay as it currently is.  All those free flowing comments - on paper and in emails - were included in the analysis.  A link to that is below. I sent the survey to traders by email but had numerous requests for it to be on paper so I hand delivered as requested.  I hand delivered others when on Devonshire Road checking traders had received the email who then asked for it on paper.  We received completed surveys by email and on paper.  I hand collected the surveys that were completed on paper.  Hand collecting was very useful as it resulted in a very high response rate - only two didn’t take part - which meant the responses were as representative as possible. The survey was compiled, with useful graphics and boxes to make choices clear, and analysed by a professional market researcher.  If there was any bias it was because the survey was solely for traders.  However, one of the most rewarding aspects of doing the survey was to have confirmed just how concerned traders are about the wider implications of any scheme on, for example, residents living above the shops, on Prince of Wales Terrace, in the Glebe Estate and further down Devonshire Road.  Community-mindedness is very strong here.  And that’s why we asked Hounslow to conduct a survey among residents on Devonshire Road, Prince of Wales Terrace, in the Glebe Estate and the southern section of Devonshire Road.  The Hounslow council consultants who conducted a survey after ours, and who I met, asked some residents for their views and, presumably, that informed their recommendations which presumably, in turn, informed Hounslow council’s announcement today.  I look forward to seeing that consultation and its analysis.  So far, we only have Hounslow's statement which, judging by my email inbox and phone calls today, has left many confused.  I have asked for clarity. Here are the results of the survey by the Chiswick Shops Task Force: http://turnhamgreen.yourcllr.com/2021/05/16/devonshire-road-first-survey-adhering-to-market-research-society-guidelines-reveals-that-while-over-half-want-the-road-restrictions-reversed-there-is-a-high-level-of-support-for-a-compromise/

Joanna Biddolph ● 1952d

Councillor Biddolph writes:"For clarity, the Chiswick Shops Task Force did conduct the survey because we wanted to know what traders thought.  That was the point of the survey."However, Councillor Biddolph already knew what traders thought:"Devonshire Road and Turnham Green Terrace closure: After a week or so of the new traffic and parking schemes it is already clear that the impact is devastating."So Councillor Biddolph undertook a survey to find out what people think about the Devonshire Road access restrictions and street dining, but because she already knew what they were going to say ("devastating"), she didn't ask them about that (although they were free to write in comments, which isn't quite the same!)Instead she asked them about a range of new pedestrianisation options - one of which was to close the road 24/7 365 days per year.  When the survey came back and (what looks like) a majority of traders (29?) wanted some form of road closure (not the current through traffic restriction), the announcement and coverage was a bit misleading:"Over half the businesses (21) said they would be happy to see Devonshire Road return to the arrangement before Hounslow Council restricted access with minimal support for the maintenance of the full closure with only 6 of the 37 businesses selecting this option.""maintenance of the full closure"?  The road has not been closed to traffic.  Customers of Capital Motors can still drive in and out.  Anyone can drive in for access.  Those 6 businesses actually wanted the permanent closure and pedestrianisation of the road!http://www.chiswickw4.com/default.asp?section=info&page=contaskforcereport002.htm

Ed Saper ● 1952d