Forum Topic

"Why can't cyclists accept this won't work? Seemingly intelligent people can't get their heads around the chaos and the disruption"I do not believe that all or even most cyclists agree with every detail of all the traffic measures being implemented. For example, pre-covid research in London showed that around one in seven existing cyclists would never use what were then called Cycle Superhighways because they regarded them as too dangerous." Maggie - the self-righteousness of the activist cycle lobby is I agree quite baffling. The best explanation that I can offer is that these are people that believe that they are saving the planet and the lives of children as yet unborn. They believe that right is on their side and that they must not listen to siren voices distracting them from their one true aim.These are self-appointed unelected tribunes of the people who love 'peoplekind' but do not actually like people with all their complexities and idiosyncracies. For them democracy and proper public consultation is a waste of time - we know the answer so lets cut the c**p and just get on with it. "The end justifies the means"is the underlying message as Lenin I believe said whilst pushing through the collectivisation of agriculture with the consequent deaths from starvation of untold legions of Ukrainian and Russian farmers.It would surely be sensible for everyone to listen to Sir David Attenborough and act accordingly."We have to treat the people we share our community with, with respect. Disturbing their lives to such an extent that innocent people can't get about their own business is a serious thing to do and could disenchant an awful lot of people from the action we are talking about." Forcing through of these traffic measures has left a sour taste in many people's mouths and a bitter legacy. No one will ever again believe (if they ever did) that Hounslow is really interested in what they personally want and need, and that their opinions will be listened to with respect. As we move with increasing urgency to tackle the problems arising from climate change some tough decisions are having to be made. The low hanging fruit has long been picked or fallen off the tree. How much better if we can all be involved in that process and feel that we are being heard and listened to?

Thomas Samuel hearn ● 2154d

While the loss of Ken and Will's trade will probably not be the final straw for many Turhham Green Terrace businesses they do face a tough time ahead. Everything seems to be going against them at the moment.While traffic queues were taking place on the Terrace even when the restrictions were operating it is likely that they will be consistently bad over Christmas. This leaves traders with a double whammy - the road itself will often be like a car park but it won't be possible for shoppers to park.The situation is likely to remain bad for the time-being because Fisher's Lane enforcement is about to start and something seems to have been done to the traffic light phasings to try and mitigate the queues on Chiswick High Road delaying motorists going south off Turnham Green Terrace.I was initially sceptical but I now think that a lot of what is happening boils down to traffic light phasing that some people have raised as a issue on this forum. The extra delay caused by a phase for cyclists at the Turnham Green Terrace junction must have modelled badly. Restrictions on Turnham Green Terrace provided no real net benefit to anyone but may be essential to the operation of the Cycleway because long queues would be a constant with the short phasings needed. That means the restrictions will have to be restored in the New Year when the Cycleway is operational.In the meantime hopefully there are enough Chiswick residents embued with the Christmas spirit to recognise that the churlist boycott of the Turnham Green Terrace shops by a few scrooge-like cycling zealots is a big extra incentive  to make an extra effort to shop with our local independents at this difficult time for them.

Paul Corcoran ● 2153d

"Have you requested any extra cycle parking near yours?"Actually, Philippa, years ago I requested a Santander bike rack but was told there was no demand to extend the network to Chiswick. Actually I've always thought it odd that extending the vast Santander network isn't Item #1 on any cycle infrastructure initiative. I know campaigners go on about it being a budget issue but let's be honest, that's the biggest load of bullshit if ever there was one. TfL is spending rampantly as is the central government now and yet the existing system doesn't grow. People quote £100,000 for a Santander rack. Surely, surely with the CS9 budget set at £70 million a mere £100,000 is a drop in the bucket. How are you at percentages? Do that math.Add to that, the cycle racks that do exist are never at capacity. Side note: a Santander rack would maximize cycle parking much more so than any LBH option plus - wait for it - it would connect with the entire city network that already exists! Amazeballs, no?Add to that foot fall is based upon capture. Capture is based upon odds. The largest group is pedestrians followed by those who drive so best to maximize on those amenities to increase those odds before we give over yet more space to an itty bitty minority. Then there's that whole social distancing thing. Remember that?Add to that the pavement out front is one of the few areas that could be given over to an improved pedestrian amenity. Like Ken says, it would attract people who could linger, sit, eat, mingle and enjoy a garden.Have you requested any information on how a business functions?Have you any idea how the variety of business offers receive their wares/ingredients/stock?

David Lesniak ● 2152d