Forum Topic

I hope they’re not using an excel spreadsheet!“ Hi Mark I wonder if you can help me please. I’ve been following the plans for the ‘South Chiswick’ traffic project with some interest. I note in the FAQ that is states: “…a ‘whitelist’ is maintained for vehicles owned by residents who live within the zone, who are permitted access during the times the road is closed to other traffic. Whilst this arrangement preserves vehicular access for certain residents, it requires a significant amount of back office administration alongside the cost of the cameras.”I have a number of questions on this, if I may. What database software you are using for the CPZs?The Hartington Road exemption list only includes 2 local CPZ and users are having to apply separately from their CPZ one – does this mean you are running a separate database install for them, in addition to the CPZ one?If so, does this mean that there’s a manual operation to set up each new database exemption list?Are there limitations with the existing CPZ database that prevent a field being added with an exemption value?Are there limitations with the existing CPZ database that prevent you from using APIs to synch up with DVLA’s database, so as for example, to include cars at a registered address?Are more ANPR based systems planned for when LTNs are rolled out across the borough? Thanks in advance, looking forward to learning more about how the database has been built, and how the back office side works.”

Russell Pearson ● 2192d

"Given that the perceived problem is non-local traffic using these roads as a rat-run, like many people I just can't see why residents in the whole of Grove Park (or South Chiswick if they must) shouldn't be allowed to use all the roads in their neighbourhood."In principle your are correct but there are five stumbling blocks.1. Administering a whitelist of such a size has never been done anywhere else. LBH are not geared up to do this.2. Using the CPZ list of names and addresses would only give a partial solution. There are for example many car owners/users who have off street parking or live on the private estates off Hartington Road who are permitted to join the CPZ but choose not to.3. LBH are currently piloting the use of ANPR technology with a maximum of two cameras. There are nine potential exits/entrances to Chiswick Riverside ward - the large number of potential routes that a rat-runner could follow would make the setting up of the system complex. But not impossible.4. Cllr Hanif Khan has on several occasions expressed the view that a scheme that allowed all local residents to travel freely within the ward would some how create an exclusive or privileged neighbourhood. He fails to understand that is exactly what he has done for Hartington Road and SOG/Thames Road residents.  5. Finally there is the almost religious belief amongst members of the cycle lobby, Cllr Khan included, that motorists must be made to suffer because this will make them reduce the number of unnecessary short journeys that they undertake. There is however no good evidence that this is a serious problem in our area. Moreover under the new schemes many of us will still be able to make short journeys into ANPR controlled streets without any penalty so long as we enter and leave by the same route. I hope that I have not confused anyone even further. Happy to answer queries emailed to me at my council email address.

Cllr Sam Hearn ● 2191d

Sam,Regarding point 3. and timed journey times between cameras, is it correct that no other local authority has yet used this method, even with 2 cameras?  I can't see you are in a position to make claims about the viability of a more complex solution.There are lots of things that are 'not impossible' but are so complicated or expensive have no change of happening in reality.  If it does turn out to be possible, I can't see that they will implement it on the boundary roads with little traffic.  So that would mean closing the following roads in both directions: Harvard Hill, Milnthorpe, Eastbourne, Park and possibly Burlington.Regarding point 4, you are fully aware that local residents can access all locations in the ward. Local residents can't park freely in the ward anyway and you don't seem to have a problem with this.Your last point seems to have been taken from the Donald Trump playbook of creating an 'outgroup' that your supporters can direct their anger and hate towards.Increasing the proportion of trips made by sustainable means is a policy objective at both mayoral and council level.  The government is providing money for "a lasting transformative change in how we make short journeys in our towns and cities".That means making walking and cycling the easiest choice.It is really you who are on the wrong side of history here, trying to oppose agreed policy of government, mayor and borough.  I don't believe you made any comments on the borough policy which was agreed 2 years ago so you seem to have been 'asleep at the wheel' on this.

Michael Robinson ● 2191d

"my understanding is that you can turn off the A316 at Burlington Lane or, if outside the two hours that the School Street scheme is in operation, at Staveley road, drive over Grove Park Bridge to visit the pharmacy and then drive back over the bridge in order to return home without fear of incurring any penalty. You would only receive a fine for driving past the camera on Hartington Rd which you would not be doing on the journey you have described if I have understood you correctly."Paul, you have indeed understood my question correctly. Thank you. I hope your comment is correct.However, I would further make the comment that, for whatever reason, there does not appear to be any clear explanation on the documentation provided by the council describing the changes they have made as to what is and what is not allowed in all circumstances. (Others have, I believe, also made similar comments).Of course, it may be that such clarification does exist but I couldn't find it. I wonder if the traffic department is going to publish any such clarification for all future restrictions. (Actually, I don't wonder as I am fairly certain that the traffic department won't do any such thing. If they do, I will, of course, apologise).On a different not, I turned into Hartington Road yesterday from the A316 (thought I would have one last fling whilst I could). I noticed some new(?) signs at the beginning of Hartington Road. I couldn't, however, read them as 1) they were hidden behind a tree, 2) they appeared to have a lot of information on them and 3) they were too close to the A316 and I was more interested in controlling my car and worrying about those vehicles behind me to consider stopping to read them before I proceeded.I can foresee some dangerous situations arising.....

John Hickman ● 2190d