Forum Topic

Well I think why people are objecting has been made pretty clear by now but you don't seem interested in what they have to say.The problem with your notion of a trial and empirical evidence is two fold. Firstly no real criteria for success or failure have been set out by the council and what data there is about traffic movements seems to largely be treated as a state secret. The council appear very reluctant to lay out what they think will happen when these changes are implemented particularly for residential roads which may experience increased traffic levels. No tolerance levels for congestion on these roads is specified.Secondly, there is a complete lack of trust of the Council. There is a rumour going around that the Staveley Road design is purposely displacing traffic down the road on which an opposition councillor lives on which, although suggesting the council planning department has a sense of humour, does not speak well for their overall concern for the well-being of the people of Chiswick.Unsubstantiated gossip aside, there is a widespread belief that once the ANPR cameras are kicking in revenue on other roads there will be an utter determination on the behalf of the council to hang onto this particular golden goose no matter what the impact is elsewhere.An evidence-based assessment would be terrific if it was done in a genuinely impartial way but any regular user of this forum will be aware how some proponents of traffic restrictions can selectively use evidence. Evidence has been provided to argue that the closure of Hammersmith Bridge is popular, great for local businesses and has reduced traffic and pollution. I'm sure some statistic will be dragged up to support this scheme even if by any rational assessment the results have been catastophic.The council could allay most of these fears by saying that any changes made during the trial would be made good should it be scrapped and that they will not proceed if there is a clear majority of residents living in affected roads are against the change.

Francis Rowe ● 2236d

"what data there is about traffic movements seems to largely be treated as a state secret"Hardly.  There was an extensive traffic survey done last year at over 50 locations in the area.  The results are summarised in a couple of documents on the South Chiswick Liveable Neighbourhood project page.  There is also an email address to request the source data.I did, and Hounslow provided a link to download the files - over 100M with over 1.3M vehicle measurements  so if you are interested in the data, you can spend weeks analysing it.  (The link has twin factor authentication so you'll need to request a link for yourself and you'll need to have some data science expertise as this volume of data is way beyond Excel.)If you have been around Chiswick you'll also have seen traffic measuring tubes that the council has recently installed.  Over the weekend while out and about I saw them on Wellesley Rd, Stile Hall Gardens, SOTG and a couple on Hartington Rd and undoubtedly they will be on other streets as well.Like the data from last year, you only need to ask the council for it, although they may not release it until they have analysed it themselves. A bit of research looking at the officer delegated decision documents for the project on the Hounslow website also shows that:'Lawford Rd A banned turn into this road from Park Road has been added at the request of ward councillors to reduce impact of any ongoing through traffic movements on Staveley Rd diverted by the diagonal closure proposed at its junction with Park."I understand the local councillors meet with officers regularly.This measure is being done as an Experimental Traffic Order and it is a legal requirement that the measures can be removed and the previous road layout restored if the decision is not to make the scheme permanent.Pre-fab traffic islands are available off-the-shelf and can be installed in minutes.

Michael Robinson ● 2236d

The Covid-19 pandemic has radically altered how we use our transport network.  Local trips, often made on foot or by bike, have noticeably increased.  Public transport use has fallen dramatically due to concerns about virus transmission and increased take up of remote working.  Trips to and from the airport, which have a big impact on the borough, have reduced in line with a radical drop in aviation activity.  These changes in how we have moved about over the last few months have had some positive impacts – some pollutants are down 20-30% against the 2019 average and there has been a notable reduction in transport related carbon emissions.  Walking and cycling (known as ‘active travel’ modes) are good forms of exercise and contribute to improved health and mental wellbeing. With fewer cars on the road, safety has also improved, though speeding traffic remains an issue of concern in places.Increasing active travel levels and reducing transport related emissions are key objectives of the council’s Transport Strategy, and Air Quality and Climate Emergency action plans, so it is key that we try to lock-in some of the positive changes experienced in the last few weeks wherever possible. In addition, in many locations it is now necessary to rethink how we allocate space on our highway and ensure that sufficient room is available for people to carry on moving around and accessing services on foot and by bike, whilst also observing social distancing.  In many cases the provision of more space for people is essential if businesses are going to be able to reopen safely under their new operating requirements.  Giving more people the option of making their journeys on foot or bike by improving comfort, safety and convenience for those using these forms of travel will also help keep the roads clear for those that have less choice in making their trips in a vehicle, limiting the cost of congestion as businesses start to reopen.To respond to these challenges and opportunities, and in line with new statutory guidance issued by the Government and the Mayor of London, we have developed the Hounslow Streetspace Programme. This programme has been developed in three phases:Phase 1 - Immediate emergency response measures that could be taken quickly to accommodate requirements for social distancing and deliver improvements for walking and cycling.Phase 2 - Further borough-wide measures to improve the safety of the network for those walking and cycling and create space for business to safely reopen in our town centres.  This phase has been informed largely by resident feedback provided through our Streetspace consultation and through engagement with key stakeholders such as schools.Phase 3 – A strategic review of the network using the latest data to identify other locations where Streetspace measures could be implemented in future, and determination of whether any of the trial measures introduced in phases 1 and 2 should be made permanent.The sort of measures that are being considered and implemented are set out in the government guidance and include:Installing ‘pop-up’ cycle facilities with a minimum level of physical separation from volume traffic; for example, mandatory cycle lanes, using light segregation features such as flexible plastic wands; or quickly converting traffic lanes into temporary cycle lanes (suspending parking bays where necessary); widening existing cycle lanes to enable cyclists to maintain distancing. Facilities should be segregated as far as possible, i.e. with physical measures separating cyclists and other traffic. Lanes indicated by road markings only are very unlikely to be sufficient to deliver the level of change needed, especially in the longer term.Using cones and barriers: to widen footways along lengths of road, particularly outside shops and transport hubs; to provide more space at bus stops to allow people to queue and socially distance; to widen pedestrian refuges and crossings (both formal and informal) to enable people to cross roads safely and at a distance.Encouraging walking and cycling to school, for example through the introduction of more ‘School Streets’. Pioneered in London, these are areas around schools where motor traffic is restricted at pick-up and drop-off times, during term-time. They can be effective in encouraging more walking and cycling, particularly where good facilities exist on routes to the school and where the parents, children and school are involved as part of the scheme development.Reducing speed limits: 20mph speed limits are being more widely adopted as an appropriate speed limit for residential roads, and many through streets in built-up areas. 20mph limits alone will not be sufficient to meet the needs of active travel, but in association with other measures, reducing the speed limit can provide a more attractive and safer environment for walking and cycling.  NB Most of Hounslow is already subject to 20mph restrictions.Introducing pedestrian and cycle zones: restricting access for motor vehicles at certain times (or at all times) to specific streets, or networks of streets, particularly town centres and high streets. This will enable active travel but also social distancing in places where people are likely to gather.Modal filters (also known as filtered permeability); closing roads to motor traffic, for example by using planters or large barriers. Often used in residential areas, this can create neighbourhoods that are low-traffic or traffic free, creating a more pleasant environment that encourages people to walk and cycle, and improving safety.  NB: In effect this is taken to mean the restriction of through traffic to major (generally classified as those with an A or B number) roads where possible.Providing additional cycle parking facilities at key locations, such as outside stations and in high streets, to accommodate an increase in cycling, for example by repurposing parking bays to accommodate cycle racks.Changes to junction design to accommodate more cyclists – for example, extending Advanced Stop Lines at traffic lights to the maximum permitted depth of 7.5 metres where possible.‘Whole-route’ approaches to create corridors for buses, cycles and access only on key routes into town and city centres.Identifying and bringing forward permanent schemes already planned, for example under Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans, and that can be constructed relatively quickly.Details of our Streetspace programme is provided on the following page. In addition, the council is also progressing a range of promotions (cycle training, bike loan schemes and maintenance sessions) to support those who are looking to start cycling again.  More information here: www.hounslow.gov.uk/CycleHounslow

Bernard Allen ● 2236d