Forum Topic

Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

Some readers may have read the very sad and alarming news that the bowling green at Gunnersbury Park is to be "repurposed" as a putting green (also known as a crazy golf course).Much has changed since the incorporation of the Community Interest Company (CIC) in 2015. In that year, as part of a leisure strategy for the Park, it was stated that "the location of the bowls club and its green is seen as a positive to the scheme in terms of development of the club, membership and participation. For example use of the sports hall for indoor short matt bowls and general increase in footfall to the site. The councils have met with the bowls club committee and will continue to work together in developing these proposals."There is no question that the CIC faces formidable financial challenges, greatly exacerbated by the Covid crisis and by the fire at the cafe. However other significant problems, including the one year delay in the completion of the Sports Hub, appear to be due to poor project management rather than to bad luck.The CIC is a not-for-profit community interest company set up to manage Gunnersbury Park and Museum. The CIC is managed by a board of 6 people, supported by an executive arm comprising the CEO and other salaried staff. Amongst other things a CIC is statutorily responsible for ensuring that the company is run in a way that satisfies the community interest test. In practice, this means that it may be required to give more weight to the interests of the community than to financial returns although, like any other company, it is required to remain solvent.A matter of very significant public concern is the "democratic deficit" which characterises the CIC's activities. This is manifested in a lack of transparency, accountabilty, and reluctance to engage with the community. For example, the CIC publishes no lists of meeting dates, agendas, minutes, or agreed action points.This latest announcement by the CIC presages the wanton destruction of a precious community facility which was founded in 1931 and which could still be reinstated. It is clear that the CIC is bent on the cynical engineering of a situation whereby they hope that a planning permission for a cafe/restaurant at the bowling club pavilion will be be granted in due course.Descriptions of events over recent years have been characterised by misunderstandings, blatant misinformation and, like any other sports club, some internal dissension. At the end of its life the Bowling Club had 25 members, of which 22 were active. The Club was fully aware of the need to grow its membership, of all ages. To this end, the CIC were approached and a strategy was presented to them. A 2-year plan, allowing for completion of the new Sports Hub building, then 1 year exposure to all the visitors to the Hub, and then 1 year of open days and free training and associated publicity. It was felt that as a result the membership could easily be raised to 60 or more particularly as there were positive signs of a revival in the sport.The CIC rejected the plan out of hand.The club was given notice to quit the site by 9 January 2020. The CIC had reneged on an agreed extension of the Licence to Occupy and thereby forced the departure of the bowls club.All of those involved in the CIC's decision should hang their heads in shame. Brentford Voice wishes to do all in its very limited power to rescue the situation. To that end we would welcome any comments, suggestions, and expressions of support.Please post your replies on this Forum or send an email to info@brentfordvoice.co.uk

Jim Storrar ● 2273d11 Comments

I absolutely agree, Jim. The behaviour towards the bowls club flies in the face of one of the three aims of the CIC:"To operate, provide or assist in the provision of community facilities to be available to all sections of the community without distinction, including use of meetings, lectures and classes and/or forms of recreation and leisure time occupation with the object of improving the conditions of life for all those who use the facilities on the Gunnersbury Estate."As we all know, mostly at the moment bowls is a game (sport?) played mostly by the older generation, ie, not kids. By removing the club they are actively pushing out a section of society. What other sport or game is there in the park for the older generation who might not want (or are able) to go to the gym?I don't have anything against Putt in the Park, I live in Acton and the one in Acton Park is very good. My issue is with the way that CIC have treated the bowls club. It's sneaky and underhand, but that seems to be CIC's way. The "we have no money because of the fire at the cafe" argument doesn't wash with me. Anybody who has used Gunnersbury in recent years could have told them that the park is unsafe at night and prone to fires. There have been numerous fires over the years with buildings burnt down, why did they think it wouldn't continue to happen once the park was improved? Since the people living in the flats moved out of the park it's a free-for-all. At least when the people lived there they would call the police to report people messing about at night. Now there's nobody there to report vandalism. How stupid are you to spend millions on something in London and then leave it unattended and accessible at night?Now on to the car park parking scam. They released a consultation stating that they were looking at a fee and I quote from their website: "We are considering a parking charge in the region of £1 per hour." So, everybody answered the consultation with that in mind - I know I did, I don't mind paying and I don't mind around a pound per hour. They then announce that the consultation said most people didn't mind paying so the fees would be £2 per hour, double what they stated in the consultation. Apparently the increase was due to covid, like we believe that. To double the proposed fee on which a consultation is based on, is what a conman would do. Give you an estimate and charge you double. They then have the cheek to ask the same people that they've screwed over for the bowls club; ignored about the issue of holding massive festivals and conned over the car park charges to then give them money to help them out? The arrogance is staggering.All that said, I don't think I have any immediate suggestions, but you have my wholehearted support.

Tania Bapuji ● 2273d